Welcome to FinHeaven Fans Forums! We're glad to have you here. Please feel free to browse the forum. We'd like to invite you to join our community; doing so will enable you to view additional forums and post with our other members.



VIP Members don't see these ads.Join VIP Now
Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 11 to 15 of 15

Thread: The rich will pay more taxes, Boehner says

  1. -11
    Statler Waldorf's Avatar
    Bench Warmer

    Status:
    Online
    WPA:
    Join date:
    Jun 2005
    Posts:
    1,208
    vCash:
    500
    Loc:
    Oregon
    Thanks / No Thanks

    To view links or images in this forum your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
    Originally Posted by Locke
    To view links or images in this forum your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
    Would you like some salsa for that chip on your shoulder? Or you can just keep crying about how being an ******* towards everyone but white males wasn't a good strategy to win the Presidency. I guess it's really your choice...


    I’d rather speak the truth and lose elections than have to lie and buy people’s votes with other people’s money. You can’t win on the issues and you know it.


    To view links or images in this forum your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
    Originally Posted by GoFins!
    To view links or images in this forum your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
    It would change a lot of people's voting tendencies if they were required to pay the higher rate they were trying to push on others.

    To view links or images in this forum your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
    Originally Posted by GoFins!
    To view links or images in this forum your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

    Imagine how different our government might look if it were a "a la carte" in which each voter only paid for the programs he supported. How many would suddenly become advocates of smaller government?
    Exactly, if a person didn’t contribute to the pie how is it fair they get to determine how it is sliced?

    I wish we could just check off which programs we wanted our tax dollars to go to on our tax sheets. If I want all of my money to go to defense it should all go to defense, that way politicians would have to lobby for our money and how they want to spend it, if a program wasn’t properly funded then it is obvious the people don’t value it enough to fund it and it must be eliminated.
    Total Depravity
    Unconditional Election
    Limited Atonement
    Irresistible Grace
    Perseverance of the Saints

  2. -12
    TheWalrus's Avatar
    L'armée des ombres

    Status:
    Online
    WPA:
    Join date:
    Dec 2011
    Posts:
    2,999
    vCash:
    502
    Thanks / No Thanks

    To view links or images in this forum your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
    Originally Posted by Statler Waldorf
    To view links or images in this forum your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
    I’d rather speak the truth and lose elections than have to lie and buy people’s votes with other people’s money. You can’t win on the issues and you know it.
    Is that what you think Romney was doing?
    To view links or images in this forum your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.


    Exactly, if a person didn’t contribute to the pie how is it fair they get to determine how it is sliced?
    How about a system where only those who serve in the military get to vote, like Starship Troopers?

    I wish we could just check off which programs we wanted our tax dollars to go to on our tax sheets. If I want all of my money to go to defense it should all go to defense, that way politicians would have to lobby for our money and how they want to spend it, if a program wasn’t properly funded then it is obvious the people don’t value it enough to fund it and it must be eliminated.
    So the problem in one thread is that people vote freebies for themselves and now you want a thousand page budget on the ballot? Yeesh.

  3. -13
    tylerdolphin's Avatar
    More Smug than Birthday Dog

    Status:
    Offline
    WPA:
    Join date:
    Sep 2005
    Posts:
    11,619
    vCash:
    332080
    Thanks / No Thanks
    Yeah, someone should totally have the option to contribute all their tax dollar to defense and nothing to the roads they drive on, police officers, teachers, parks, or anything else. I cant see the problem there TBH.

    To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.





    To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

  4. -14
    Dolphins9954's Avatar
    Pro Bowler

    Status:
    Offline
    WPA:
    Join date:
    Apr 2005
    Posts:
    9,124
    vCash:
    500
    Thanks / No Thanks
    OK we raise taxes....great. So what happens when Obama calls for more spending in the next 4 years?? Because anyone who thinks he's not planning on more spending is insane. There will be more for sure. Especially on the war front and government spending/power gimmicks to come. Government never stops expanding. It's like the Blob. Not using new tax revenue to balance the budget and pay off debt would be totally irresponsible. Just as bad as tax cuts and increasing spending.
    Last edited by Dolphins9954; 12-06-2012 at 11:49 PM.


    To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.




    "Politics is the Art of Looking for Trouble, Finding it Everywhere, Diagnosing it Incorrectly, and Applying the Wrong Remedies"

  5. -15
    Waterlogged

    Status:
    Offline
    WPA:
    Join date:
    Jul 2010
    Posts:
    3,176
    vCash:
    501
    Thanks / No Thanks
    The rich defending the rich in here? lol

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •