Tannehill is a FREAKING ROOKIE

[Dolfan4life]

Tannehill should never have an incompletion. He should never throw an interception. He should never fumble. He should never get sacked. The WRs should never drop a pass. The oline should never get pancaked by Aldon Smith and allow a sack. The running back should pick up a first down every play. Wake should get a sack every play. Sean smith should... Well I've gone to far there

Sad that everything I just said is HUMANLY IMPOSSIBLE BEACUASE THEY ARE HUMAN AND HUMAN BEINGS ARE NOT INFALLABLE LIKE MANY HERE BELIEVE

Was it an over throw to Bess? YES. Is Bess short and slow? YES. Was it an overthrow to M. Moore? HELL NO! How about your receivers making a play every now and again

Where's this amazing stud Rishard Matthews been. He looks pretty in uniform but that's it. These guys are not great WRs. Period.

[DDTDON]

If he was missing these throws early in the game id agree with you. The fact that he threw 6 straight incompletions and missed bess wide open for a TD late, with the game on the line, tells me its something else

Are you serious, Bess is a Slot WR at best. No way he had a shot at that ball. We need a true number 1 WR.

[DDTDON]

You can't miss 6 straight completions with the game on the line. That's just pathetic.

No what's pathetic, is expecting a rookie QB, who was considered raw to play like Luck and RG3, with no help at the WR position. He played well today and kept us in the game. I think some of you so called fans, should just go find another team to root for.

[WestPhish]

I think people around here have the Dan Marino syndrome. We've been spoiled for so many years having Danny under center that we expect every QB that takes the field to play like Dan. Well there was only one Dan Marino, few if any will hold a candle to him. GET USED TO IT!. Now getting back to Tannehill, the kid has no weapons and he is a rookie. Our receiving core sucks. Receivers can't get open, and they don't have the speed to outrun their defenders. Our O line is piss poor too, they don't open enough holes for good running plays and they don't give Tannehill enough time to throw. I hope that Ireland (wishing it was someone else) addresses our offensive needs this offseason, and gives our QB something to work with. Until then, I will give Tannehill the benefit of the doubt.

[Czonka39]

	C/ATT	YDS	AVG	TD	INT	SACKS	QBR	RTG
To view links or images in this forum your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.	16/34	196	5.8	1	2	4-25	18.4	50.6

[slickrickpuppy]

tannehill can't win in the 4th ..just like in college..he shows no energy is scared s##@less of throwing a interception so he can't hit no one..his wr's are average but still you have to will your team to a win..move around in the pocket give your wr's or rb's ti
To view links or images in this forum your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

[scodoublet]

This circus is hard to watch...

[dimitri416]

Plain and simple guys. We **** the bed on Tannehill! First of all, you need a top 10 QB to be a playoff contender every year. Now you can say give Tannehill a few years to learn and develop but in reality he has way too many deficiencies at the QB position to fix for him to become a top 10 starter. Heck fine I'll accept a top 15 starter. You need to work with a QB who was alot of facets of the position down packed, yes even as a rookie, where there's a few things you can concentrate on and develop. Tannehill has way too many holes to fix. Pocket presence is bad, he may look poise but, doesn't know when to step up in the pocket, sometimes he is too close to the line and he attempts to throw. He's innacurate, on medium to deep passes he continues to miss. Tannehill stares down his recievers. When there's no blitz he's indecisive and struggle find a target. I know you supposed to get rid of the ball early but when there's time in the pocket be alert let some plays develop, he doesn't. He's too predictable. His strengths are throwing on the run but he has tunnel vision when rolling out, loses sight of the field. His passer rating on rollouts is atrocious. Overall his decision making is very concerning. His decision making alone against New England cost us that game. Way too many to fix and develop, this guy is not going to panout. Yeah I can see him being a top 15-20 range but I'd rather look elsewhere. If your QB is in that range you will be mediocre. You need to be seeking a QB he is or develops into a top 10 QB to win in this league and when I mean win, I mean mean significant wins! Andrew Luck, RG3,Wilson.Foles,Cousins are all rookies too. It's not that Tannehill comes right in line after these guys, He is bar far the worst of all these guys. RG3 doesn't have a #1 WR,Wilson doesn't, Foles doesn't. A really good QB (top10) makes the WR's.

[Dick Pepperwood]

### Tannehill has only seven touchdown passes (8 Now) (on pace for 9.3), and for some historical perspective on how bad that is, consider: Elias tells us that since the NFL went to a 16-game schedule in 1978, only two quarterbacks have started all 16 games and thrown fewer than 10 touchdowns: Trent Dilfer (four in 1995) and David Carr (nine in 2002).

Read more here:
To view links or images in this forum your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

[Miamibyrd]

He is just a rookie, but at tge same time we as a team don't fold. He has something ro work o, but damn it wont happen over night.