Tannehill is a FREAKING ROOKIE

[JCane]

Oh that's cool.

Andrew Luck is a rookie, too!

Maybe they can be bunk buddies at summer camp.

[MrEd]

I cant wait to have a receiver with Mike Wallace speed, with a guy like that he will be burning db's all day. I dont think people realize how bad our receiving group is

...so that Tannehill can overthrow him wide open. let me stop. lol smh

[flynryan15]

Kid gets no help a freaking FINGERNAIL takes Hartline down, Bess doesn't layout, Mathews drops the long ball yeah he got the first in a illegal contact, but all the other rookies have guys making plays for them!

[Fin_Frenzy_84]

If your bashing tannehill after this game go jump off a ****in cliff. He played a top notch defense with no team around him and still didn't turn the ball over. I swear some of you fans are ****ing stupid as ****

[OyeDale305]

Weeden is garbage

[phinfan13]

Oh that's cool.

Andrew Luck is a rookie, too!

Maybe they can be bunk buddies at summer camp.

Yeah, maybe Luck could teach him a thing or two. Like how to come back in games when you're down by more than one score.

[Fin_Frenzy_84]

So is luck,Wilson, rg3, and even weeden and foles.

I also believe all those QBs have more experience than Tannehill did as a QB... Go be a jets fan

[TheWarriorFins]

Oh that's cool.

Andrew Luck is a rookie, too!

Maybe they can be bunk buddies at summer camp.

Let's not compare luck to tannehill who was a reach at 8.

Huh? Aside from that pass to Hartline that the defender made a great play on... his deep accuracy was garbage. It's an extremely low standard to call that performance good.

The pass to moore deep was perfect and dropped and you couldn't have thrown the ball to hartline any better the defender made a great play.

[DMAS]

Go back the last three years and insert Henne's name and you could see this exact same thread on this board countless times. Always the same stuff, o-line, receivers, coaching are always the problem. What people don't understand is that each unit does not exist in a vacuum. A good QB helps out everybody else also. Tanny may become a decent qb eventually but from what I have seen so far, I have serious doubts that he will ever be top shelf. In any event, it does not much matter what I or anybody else on this board thinks...we shall see.

[volk]

Tannehill has no weapons argument is getting old. This team needs receivers but Bess is a great slot guy, Hartline is decent and Fasano isn't as bad as we make him out to be. Plus, how many teams wish they had a Reggie Bush talent on offense? Yes, we have serious holes but there is far more to the Tannehill issue than just a lack of great receivers.

Tannehill needs receivers, OL help, better play calling and a team that doesn't make every conceivable mistake in the book putting him in impossible situations all the time. He also has plenty to work to do on accuracy and situational football.

Fans casting all the blame on a lack of talent on offense or just on Tannehill's struggles are really missing the greater picture on this team.


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk HD