Welcome to FinHeaven Fans Forums! We're glad to have you here. Please feel free to browse the forum. We'd like to invite you to join our community; doing so will enable you to view additional forums and post with our other members.



VIP Members don't see these ads.Join VIP Now
Page 2 of 8 FirstFirst 1234567 ... LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 71

Thread: Do we address our WR needs with the first round draft pick?

  1. -11
    Waterlogged

    Status:
    Offline
    WPA:
    Join date:
    Jul 2010
    Posts:
    3,176
    vCash:
    501
    Thanks / No Thanks

    To view links or images in this forum your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
    Originally Posted by Fin_Frenzy_84
    To view links or images in this forum your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
    Nope! We can double up in the second with WR and this draft is full of them in the first 3 rounds! Draft a pass rusher or someone to help our secondary.
    Pass rusher? dude we have one of the strong D- lines, the hell would we want to waste more picks on the d-line for? we need a damn secondary and some weapons for tannehill.

  2. -12
    Gonzo's Avatar
    Administrator

    Status:
    Online
    WPA:
    Join date:
    Mar 2004
    Posts:
    17,333
    vCash:
    9600
    Loc:
    Brooklyn
    Thanks / No Thanks

    To view links or images in this forum your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
    Originally Posted by MarshallFin1
    To view links or images in this forum your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
    Pass rusher? dude we have one of the strong D- lines, the hell would we want to waste more picks on the d-line for? we need a damn secondary and some weapons for tannehill.
    The best way to combat the pass game in a pass-friendly league is through constant pressure. A good QB can tear up any secondary if given enough time. Wake is great, but outside of him, we have limited pass rush (Odrick has been mediocre at best). Our line is great against the run and good inside, be we need another outside rusher badly. Further, pass-rushing talent in the upper end of the draft is higher than DB and WR talent, so it also becomes a BPA thing. Pass rusher is absolutely one of our top 3 needs.

    To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.






  3. -13
    Spesh's Avatar
    Fat Kid

    Status:
    Offline
    WPA:
    Join date:
    Apr 2007
    Posts:
    5,158
    vCash:
    1100
    Thanks / No Thanks

    To view links or images in this forum your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
    Originally Posted by MarshallFin1
    To view links or images in this forum your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
    Pass rusher? dude we have one of the strong D- lines, the hell would we want to waste more picks on the d-line for? we need a damn secondary and some weapons for tannehill.
    Draft for talent, not need.

    Worst case scenario? We have multiple pass rushers to hit the quarterback. Not the worst thing in the world. As well, Wake isnt getting any younger.

    To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
    Originally Posted by RT2DT4TD
    To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
    I will remember you TeddSlimmJr and Spesh, after we win it all, I'll just sit back and laugh with fond memories of my superior football IQ.

    To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

  4. -14
    Gonzo's Avatar
    Administrator

    Status:
    Online
    WPA:
    Join date:
    Mar 2004
    Posts:
    17,333
    vCash:
    9600
    Loc:
    Brooklyn
    Thanks / No Thanks

    To view links or images in this forum your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
    Originally Posted by tony0021
    To view links or images in this forum your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
    NO WR FROM THE DRAFT!! pick up an elite veteran like dwayne bowe or someone thats elite. look at justin blackmon for example. he just had 1 good game but overall he's a bust
    While I agree that I would rather grab a veteran than draft a WR in the first round (and I've been one of the biggest bashers of the lack of WR talent on this team all year), it's far too early to call Blackmon a bust. Few WRs break out in their first year. I think it has to do with the learning curve for the position from college to the pros. Their roles are often far more complex than they were in college, more so than other positions like RB. Add in the fact that he has two godawful QBs throwing to him and it's a recipe for a slow development. Despite this, he's still played decently and has showed flashes. He also has more TDs than both of our starting WRs combined (not that that is saying much).

  5. -15
    Waterlogged

    Status:
    Offline
    WPA:
    Join date:
    Jul 2010
    Posts:
    3,176
    vCash:
    501
    Thanks / No Thanks

    To view links or images in this forum your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
    Originally Posted by Gonzo
    To view links or images in this forum your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
    The best way to combat the pass game in a pass-friendly league is through constant pressure. A good QB can tear up any secondary if given enough time. Wake is great, but outside of him, we have limited pass rush (Odrick has been mediocre at best). Our line is great against the run and good inside, be we need another outside rusher badly. Further, pass-rushing talent in the upper end of the draft is higher than DB and WR talent, so it also becomes a BPA thing. Pass rusher is absolutely one of our top 3 needs.
    right, so lets just keep drafting d-lineman and not add any playmakers to our secondary. This is why everyone here is always complaining about lack of turnovers, all everybody wants is pass rushers when we already have a decent pass rush, guess what we got more sacks than san fran yesterday , a superbowl caliber D-line in san fran, its the best unit on the team LEAVE IT ALONE. WE HAVE NO PLAYMAKERS IN OUR SECONDARY. So even if u get good pressure, you have no playmkers!!! reshad jones is an emerging one but at CB we have none, carroll is solid but sean smith needs to go. We need a true #1 CB, vontae was good but we gave him up on too early cause our gm is a moron. It has to be balanced dude, you cannot keep adding pass rushers without having any talent at CB, its pointless to get pressure when you dont have any cbs looking to get INTs. All sean smith wants to do is play zone, he is not aggressive and looks flat out lazy out there at times. His tackling is also an embarassment. CB is my #1 pick for this team, and WR is 2nd. NO more pass rushers or lineman. Get us some damn playmakers already that can make an impact.

  6. -16
    sirvmac's Avatar
    Starter

    Status:
    Offline
    WPA:
    Join date:
    Mar 2006
    Posts:
    384
    vCash:
    500
    Loc:
    Chicago
    Thanks / No Thanks

    To view links or images in this forum your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
    Originally Posted by MyNameIsFlipper
    To view links or images in this forum your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
    I'm looking at 4 mock drafts and only one of them has us taking a WR(from CAL) while the others have us taking a OT to replace Jake Long. Your thoughts?
    I'm thinking no. Can we get 2 of Patterson/Rodgers/Swope,etc with our 2nd/3rd round picks?
    I hope so, that would be my plan.

  7. -17
    rent this space's Avatar
    Starter

    Status:
    Online
    WPA:
    Join date:
    Apr 2007
    Posts:
    2,997
    vCash:
    500
    Thanks / No Thanks
    I would be happy with either CB or pass-rusher in the first, we need both. good WR's can always be found in the 2nd, especially this year

  8. -18
    Starter

    Status:
    Offline
    WPA:
    Join date:
    Jan 2006
    Posts:
    300
    vCash:
    500
    Loc:
    South Carolina
    Thanks / No Thanks
    Dolphins biggest need is offense. someone to score some points. I would go WR and TE with 2 of the first 3 picks.

  9. -19
    MRojas4's Avatar
    The Cheese Connoisseur

    Status:
    Offline
    WPA:
    Join date:
    Dec 2010
    Posts:
    1,389
    vCash:
    600
    Loc:
    Miami, Fl
    Thanks / No Thanks
    Double up on WR's in the second. Plenty of talent at the WR position, although the drop off after the top 10 WR's is huge.

    I'd be looking at either top DE, CB, or S.

    If we are going the OT/G route I'd hope we can trade back to a late first and pick up a extra 3rd.

    To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

    To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

    To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

  10. -20
    Spesh's Avatar
    Fat Kid

    Status:
    Offline
    WPA:
    Join date:
    Apr 2007
    Posts:
    5,158
    vCash:
    1100
    Thanks / No Thanks
    Anyone draft just for need is always going to be a year behind. Its this sort of retroactive thinking that has directly lead to us losing.

    -We have to spend high draft picks on glaring holes.

    Many feel that our draft picks are justified because we have a glaring hole on the roster. This has been the “logic” used when selecting centers and right tackles in the top two rounds. Like many emotional reactions to devastating news, this notion has flaws.

    When Martin Mayhew drafted Ryan Broyles in the second round, many reporters and fans questioned the pick. After all, they had a glaring hole at cornerback and they had talented receivers. His response was merely pointing out that the team was strong at the wideout position today but it won’t be in the future. Nate Burleson is 31 years old and will surely start slowing down soon. In later interviews he and Jim Shwartz pointed out that talent rules their board and they grab what falls regardless of the position. One such interview is linked below. Bottom line is: The Lions successfully filled a hole before it was created.


    To view links or images in this forum your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.


    If another example is needed look no further than the 2011 draft. Going into the draft the Dallas Cowboys desperately needed offensive lineman. They were bleeding at that position and made it clear to everyone they would be addressing it. So, with the 9th overall pick, they selected Tyron Smith. Two picks later the Houston Texans drafted the most talented player on their board: J.J. Watt. Smith has become a pretty good tackle. Watt has become one of the best players in the league. And a year later the Cowboys are now noticing they need defensive ends.

    To view links or images in this forum your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
    =

    Draft for talent. A overall talented roster can overcome short term needs. I wont even get into how much more often great corners and wideouts hit free agency compared to great pass rushers.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •