Welcome to FinHeaven Fans Forums! We're glad to have you here. Please feel free to browse the forum. We'd like to invite you to join our community; doing so will enable you to view additional forums and post with our other members.



VIP Members don't see these ads.Join VIP Now
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 15

Thread: If Tannehill had this Receiving Core what would our record be??

  1. -1
    Starter

    Status:
    Online
    WPA:
    Join date:
    Jun 2004
    Posts:
    758
    vCash:
    500
    Loc:
    Miami Florida
    Thanks / No Thanks

    If Tannehill had this Receiving Core what would our record be??

    Same exact team but replace Bess, Hartline and Fasano with the Falcons group of Julio Jones, Roddy White and Tony Gonzalez?

    I think we would have won these games
    Jets - L 20-23 would had one this game if carpenter makes the FG so I'd say we would score more than 20 points and would have won this one

    Cardinals - L 21-24 almost won this one too but lost because of missed FG. I'd say we would win this one easily with these players

    Colts - Lost 23-20, think we beat them with these players

    Buffalo - lost 14-19 think we score more than 14 points against the bills and win

    Patriots - lost 23-16, think we score more than 23 points - think we're better than the patriots with these added players and we win assuming the D holds the pats to 23 points

    I think we would have won the games that we did win so that puts us at what 10-3? I think we lose to the texans, the Titans was just an overall bad game which happens so i'm assuming we have a bad day that day so i count it as a loss, and I think the niners could win the SB so I kept that loss. Point, give Tannehill 3 TRUE PLAYMAKERS on offense we're a contender.

    To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

    To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

  2. -2
    Birdmond's Avatar
    Starter

    Status:
    Offline
    WPA:
    Join date:
    Nov 2012
    Posts:
    403
    vCash:
    500
    Thanks / No Thanks
    Hard to argue with that although imagine what Russell Wilson, Luck or RGIII could do with those weapons.
    To view links or images in this forum your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

  3. -3
    Seasoned Veteran

    Status:
    Offline
    WPA:
    Join date:
    Aug 2009
    Posts:
    926
    vCash:
    500
    Thanks / No Thanks
    You can have Tannehill and your choice of any all-pro receivers you like

    I'll take either Manning or Brady or Rodgers and your choice of any receivers you think suck (ours if you like)

    Mine will beat yours every time

    BTW I'm not against Tannehill, it's just where he stands currently. He could still become very good in time

  4. -4
    Starter

    Status:
    Online
    WPA:
    Join date:
    Jun 2004
    Posts:
    758
    vCash:
    500
    Loc:
    Miami Florida
    Thanks / No Thanks

    To view links or images in this forum your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
    Originally Posted by Doctor Phibes
    To view links or images in this forum your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
    You can have Tannehill and your choice of any all-pro receivers you like

    I'll take either Manning or Brady or Rodgers and your choice of any receivers you think suck (ours if you like)

    Mine will beat yours every time

    BTW I'm not against Tannehill, it's just where he stands currently. He could still become very good in time
    So you're saying with Brady on this team same offense same players we're 10-3? Brady's great but I don't see that happening

  5. -5
    MRojas4's Avatar
    The Cheese Connoisseur

    Status:
    Offline
    WPA:
    Join date:
    Dec 2010
    Posts:
    1,392
    vCash:
    600
    Loc:
    Miami, Fl
    Thanks / No Thanks

    To view links or images in this forum your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
    Originally Posted by jjizzim
    To view links or images in this forum your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
    Same exact team but replace Bess, Hartline and Fasano with the Falcons group of Julio Jones, Roddy White and Tony Gonzalez?

    I think we would have won these games
    Jets - L 20-23 would had one this game if carpenter makes the FG so I'd say we would score more than 20 points and would have won this one

    Cardinals - L 21-24 almost won this one too but lost because of missed FG. I'd say we would win this one easily with these players

    Colts - Lost 23-20, think we beat them with these players

    Buffalo - lost 14-19 think we score more than 14 points against the bills and win

    Patriots - lost 23-16, think we score more than 23 points - think we're better than the patriots with these added players and we win assuming the D holds the pats to 23 points

    I think we would have won the games that we did win so that puts us at what 10-3? I think we lose to the texans, the Titans was just an overall bad game which happens so i'm assuming we have a bad day that day so i count it as a loss, and I think the niners could win the SB so I kept that loss. Point, give Tannehill 3 TRUE PLAYMAKERS on offense we're a contender.
    Wow now. Don't bring this up, the THill bashers will get upset.

    Don't you know pointing out the lack of talent around a rookie QB does not excuse his poor play. Never mind that basically every other rookie QB has a above average to elite offense surrounding them (minus Weeden).

    You are....just making too much sense.
    To view links or images in this forum your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

    To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

    To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

    To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

  6. -6
    Starter

    Status:
    Online
    WPA:
    Join date:
    Jun 2004
    Posts:
    758
    vCash:
    500
    Loc:
    Miami Florida
    Thanks / No Thanks

    To view links or images in this forum your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
    Originally Posted by Birdmond
    To view links or images in this forum your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
    Hard to argue with that although imagine what Russell Wilson, Luck or RGIII could do with those
    weapons.
    To view links or images in this forum your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
    Luck has Wayne, HOFmer Avery and Fleener Wayne is right there with white and jones and I'd take Fleener over a 35 year old Gonzalez so what is lucks record with his group 9-4? They'd be about the same with Atlanta's group

  7. -7
    flynryan15's Avatar
    FinHeaven VIP

    Status:
    Offline
    WPA:
    Join date:
    Jan 2009
    Posts:
    10,111
    vCash:
    500
    Thanks / No Thanks
    If if if? He doesn't and do you know why? Because our GM doesn't value the wr position he likes to bring in development QBs and give them no weapons!

    To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

  8. -8
    MRojas4's Avatar
    The Cheese Connoisseur

    Status:
    Offline
    WPA:
    Join date:
    Dec 2010
    Posts:
    1,392
    vCash:
    600
    Loc:
    Miami, Fl
    Thanks / No Thanks

    To view links or images in this forum your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
    Originally Posted by jjizzim
    To view links or images in this forum your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
    Luck has Wayne, HOFmer Avery and Fleener Wayne is right there with white and jones and I'd take Fleener over a 35 year old Gonzalez so what is lucks record with his group 9-4? They'd be about the same with Atlanta's group

    Or Wilson with the Seahawks.

    M. Lynch, Golden Tate, Sidney Rice, Doug Baldwin, Zach Miller

  9. -9
    Starter

    Status:
    Online
    WPA:
    Join date:
    Jun 2004
    Posts:
    758
    vCash:
    500
    Loc:
    Miami Florida
    Thanks / No Thanks

    To view links or images in this forum your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
    Originally Posted by flynryan15
    To view links or images in this forum your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
    If if if? He doesn't and do you know why? Because our GM doesn't value the wr position he likes to bring in development QBs and give them no weapons!

    You're absolutely correct, he doesn't and as far as our GM. I'm right there with you, but I'm really anxious to see how he handles this next draft. Last years draft was his first At the top of the thrown and mission #1 was to find a QB, assuming T-hill is that, he's doing great. Now the objective "Should be" to find talent to put around the QB, in free agency and the Draft, we'll see how he handles that. If he screws it up, then i'll say get rid of him. Right now the jury is still out. This past draft wasn't that bad. Again assuming T-hill is a franchise QB, we got vernon that has contributed this year Martin thats started from day 1 and Miller that has shown flashes of being a playmaker. Looks like he missed on Egnew but can't label him bust just yet. My bigger concern is his Free Agent aquisitions, those have been horrible, even the moves he made this year. Getting rid of Mashall with no replacement plan for this year = fail, Legadu NeNe ........... FAIL, so this FA is my biggest concern.

  10. -10
    Birdmond's Avatar
    Starter

    Status:
    Offline
    WPA:
    Join date:
    Nov 2012
    Posts:
    403
    vCash:
    500
    Thanks / No Thanks

    To view links or images in this forum your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
    Originally Posted by MRojas4
    To view links or images in this forum your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
    Or Wilson with the Seahawks.

    M. Lynch, Golden Tate, Sidney Rice, Doug Baldwin, Zach Miller
    Up until this season Tate and Rice have been huge disappointments. I wonder why they have improved. Could it be that their QB is a playmaker unlike ours?

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •