Welcome to FinHeaven Fans Forums! We're glad to have you here. Please feel free to browse the forum. We'd like to invite you to join our community; doing so will enable you to view additional forums and post with our other members.



VIP Members don't see these ads.Join VIP Now
Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 26

Thread: Buffalo wants a QB in April

  1. -11
    Birdmond's Avatar
    Starter

    Status:
    Offline
    WPA:
    Join date:
    Nov 2012
    Posts:
    403
    vCash:
    500
    Thanks / No Thanks
    Every QB in this draft is a scrub and at best will be a career back up.

  2. -12
    WaxOn WaxOff's Avatar
    Starter

    Status:
    Offline
    WPA:
    Join date:
    Apr 2005
    Posts:
    996
    vCash:
    500
    Thanks / No Thanks
    The best QB in this draft is from NC State. Guy is tall, cannon arm, looks ideal for the pro level. Much better deep ball than Tannyhill. I would sit tight if Buffalo and take the kid in Round 1. I wouldn't take a chance he lasts to Rd 2.

  3. -13
    Mudder1310's Avatar
    FinHeaven VIP

    Status:
    Offline
    WPA:
    Join date:
    Jan 2012
    Posts:
    588
    vCash:
    500
    Loc:
    St Helens, Or
    Thanks / No Thanks

    To view links or images in this forum your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
    Originally Posted by WaxOn WaxOff
    To view links or images in this forum your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
    The best QB in this draft is from NC State. Guy is tall, cannon arm, looks ideal for the pro level. Much better deep ball than Tannyhill. I would sit tight if Buffalo and take the kid in Round 1. I wouldn't take a chance he lasts to Rd 2.
    Mike Glennon? His stock has been rising. He should be at the senior bowl. Latest rumor has the Chiefs interested.

  4. -14
    Gonzo's Avatar
    Administrator

    Status:
    Online
    WPA:
    Join date:
    Mar 2004
    Posts:
    17,338
    vCash:
    9600
    Loc:
    Brooklyn
    Thanks / No Thanks
    Personally, I think they should ignore QB, draft an LT, and continue to ****ing suck under Chan Gailey.

    To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.






  5. -15
    MadDog 88's Avatar
    Sopwith Camel Pilot

    Status:
    Offline
    WPA:
    Join date:
    Jul 2008
    Posts:
    10,537
    vCash:
    900
    Loc:
    Aviano, Italy
    Thanks / No Thanks
    Not a good year if you are in need of a QB. I doubt any trading up for a QB is completed because there just isn't anyone that would be worth sacrificing numerous picks on. The Bills may trade down in an attempt to gain the addidtional pick then draft Barkley as I think he is still the best prospect on the board.

  6. -16
    allsilverdreams's Avatar
    Starter

    Status:
    Offline
    WPA:
    Join date:
    Apr 2007
    Posts:
    1,976
    vCash:
    500
    Thanks / No Thanks
    like i said in another post that the jets will mortage there future and move up high enough to snag 1 of the best QB'S on the table.i dont see buffalo with the balls to do this so they will prob draft a QB in the second.unless gailey is gone than maybe just maybe they grow a pair and try to move up like the skins did and the jets will do this year

  7. -17
    Bumpus's Avatar
    Are you gonna drink that?

    Status:
    Offline
    WPA:
    Join date:
    Jun 2003
    Posts:
    17,184
    vCash:
    371380
    Loc:
    West-by-god-Virginny
    Thanks / No Thanks
    Anyone who trades up to get Geno Smith in the first round WILL be looking for employment within two years.


    ... Said the rabid WVU fan.

    To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
    2013 Goals:
    To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

    1) Win the next game.
    2) See goal #1



    To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.



    "The problem with internet quotes is verifying their authenticity."
    -Abraham Lincoln

    Countdown to Lord Stanley's fabled Cup

    To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

    1 2 3 4 - 5 6 7 8 - 9 10 11 12 - 13 14 15 16

  8. -18
    datruth55's Avatar
    Starter

    Status:
    Offline
    WPA:
    Join date:
    Aug 2004
    Posts:
    8,517
    vCash:
    500
    Loc:
    Lexington, NC
    Thanks / No Thanks

    To view links or images in this forum your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
    Originally Posted by Birdmond
    To view links or images in this forum your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
    Every QB in this draft is a scrub and at best will be a career back up.
    I like Tyler Wilson...I think he has the most potential in this class but I'm glad we have our QB already.

  9. -19
    Nublar7's Avatar
    FinHeaven Administrator

    Status:
    Offline
    WPA:
    Join date:
    Aug 2003
    Posts:
    31,439
    vCash:
    2469400
    Loc:
    Pennsylvania
    Thanks / No Thanks
    Kind of odd that Nix is showing his draft hand in December. Makes him look desperate and now teams know he will do anything to trade up for a quarterback. GMs picking ahead of the Bills will be smiling on draft day as they likely will get the Bills to overpay or get another team in the bidding with Buffalo. Dangerous situation that Nix has put the team in.

    Also, as said already in this thread, this draft is lacking at quarterback near the top. Smith and Barkley are the obvious top two, but Smith will probably go to KC and I wouldn't be surprised if the Eagles target a quarterback despite taking Foles last year. The Eagles were reportedly thinking about trading up for Tannehill in this past draft, so I wouldn't be surprised if the new regime wants a new quarterback. Speaking of Tannehill, he would probably be the top rated quarterback in this year's draft. Smith would definitely give him a run for his money as the #1 quarterback, but I don't see anyone else that you can honsetly say is a better long term prospect then Tannehill.

    To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.


    To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

  10. -20
    FinHeaven VIP

    Status:
    Offline
    WPA:
    Join date:
    Apr 2011
    Posts:
    2,563
    vCash:
    9000
    Thanks / No Thanks

    To view links or images in this forum your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
    Originally Posted by Nublar7
    To view links or images in this forum your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
    Kind of odd that Nix is showing his draft hand in December. Makes him look desperate and now teams know he will do anything to trade up for a quarterback. GMs picking ahead of the Bills will be smiling on draft day as they likely will get the Bills to overpay or get another team in the bidding with Buffalo. Dangerous situation that Nix has put the team in.

    Also, as said already in this thread, this draft is lacking at quarterback near the top. Smith and Barkley are the obvious top two, but Smith will probably go to KC and I wouldn't be surprised if the Eagles target a quarterback despite taking Foles last year. The Eagles were reportedly thinking about trading up for Tannehill in this past draft, so I wouldn't be surprised if the new regime wants a new quarterback. Speaking of Tannehill, he would probably be the top rated quarterback in this year's draft. Smith would definitely give him a run for his money as the #1 quarterback, but I don't see anyone else that you can honsetly say is a better long term prospect then Tannehill.
    I think the Jags and Raiders could also be looking for a QB early along with the Chiefs, Eagles, Bills and Cards.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •