South Carolina House of Representatives Start Bill to Arm School Employees

[KTOWNFINFAN]

To view links or images in this forum your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.



Finally a group that "gets it". More guns = less crime, ALWAYS!!!!!

---------- Post added at 11:44 AM ---------- Previous post was at 11:43 AM ----------


To view links or images in this forum your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

[phins_4_ever]

Funny how convenient it suddenly is to have government involved. Who is going to pay for all the guns to arm school employees and who is going to pay for their practices and gun licenses? Government?

Here is a gun legislation: tax the living crap out of guns. If you have more than a simple revolver for self defense I throw in a $1000/year (per weapon) gun license fee.
That solves several problems: you contribute to the federal budget (increased revenue), you pay for luxury and unnecessary items, you still have the 2nd amendment protected, and you probably have less of those "oh look at the cool semi-automatic assault rifle I have. I may have a small d**** but I got a big a**weapon".

EDIT: FH - check the profanity filter. I edited my post. It let a couple words through.

[Bumpus]

Funny how convenient it suddenly is to have government involved. Who is going to pay for all the guns to arm school employees and who is going to pay for their practices and gun licenses? Government?

Here is a gun legislation: tax the living crap out of guns. If you have more than a simple revolver for self defense I throw in a $1000/year (per weapon) gun license fee.
That solves several problems: you contribute to the federal budget (increased revenue), you pay for luxury and unnecessary items, you still have the 2nd amendment protected, and you probably have less of those "oh look at the cool semi-automatic assault rifle I have. I may have a small d**** but I got a big a**weapon".

EDIT: FH - check the profanity filter. I edited my post. It let a couple words through.

That's not what the article said.

COLUMBIA, S.C. -- A new bill introduced Tuesday in the South Carolina House of Representatives aims to arm public school employees on campuses throughout the state.

Republican Rep. Phillip D. Lowe (District 60) wants to amend the code by adding a section "to provide a public school employee who has a concealed weapons permit may possess a firearm on the premises of his employer."

So, essentially, you'd already have to have a concealed carry permit. Not sure how it works in S. Carolina, but here in WV it means you have to have taken training in firearms safety before being issued the permit.

For the record - I'd carry.

Not kidding.

[jared81]

Funny how convenient it suddenly is to have government involved. Who is going to pay for all the guns to arm school employees and who is going to pay for their practices and gun licenses? Government?

Here is a gun legislation: tax the living crap out of guns. If you have more than a simple revolver for self defense I throw in a $1000/year (per weapon) gun license fee.
That solves several problems: you contribute to the federal budget (increased revenue), you pay for luxury and unnecessary items, you still have the 2nd amendment protected, and you probably have less of those "oh look at the cool semi-automatic assault rifle I have. I may have a small d**** but I got a big a**weapon".

EDIT: FH - check the profanity filter. I edited my post. It let a couple words through.

except for the fact that the shooters family was well off. living in a big house and giving money away to people. taxing people isnt the solution. ban assualt weapons and dealing with people with mental health (im not smart enough to know what to do here), would be a start.

[phins_4_ever]

except for the fact that the shooters family was well off. living in a big house and giving money away to people. taxing people isnt the solution. ban assualt weapons and dealing with people with mental health (im not smart enough to know what to do here), would be a start.

Uhummmm.
It was a joke.

That was my point. My ridiculous idea is as ridiculous as forcing school employees to carry guns. What if the entire staff of a school is against it? Government going to force guns on school property? Are we making a salary difference between gun carrying teachers and non-gun carrying teachers like in the security industry?
And what guarantee do we have that a teacher is actually pulling the trigger? And what is a teacher or school employee going to do if he or she faces the gun toting person from behind? Shoot him/her in the back?

Besides the cost of such legislation there are many more intangible involved then a gun restricting legislature without touching the 2nd amendment.

[KTOWNFINFAN]

Funny how convenient it suddenly is to have government involved. Who is going to pay for all the guns to arm school employees and who is going to pay for their practices and gun licenses? Government?

Here is a gun legislation: tax the living crap out of guns. If you have more than a simple revolver for self defense I throw in a $1000/year (per weapon) gun license fee.
That solves several problems: you contribute to the federal budget (increased revenue), you pay for luxury and unnecessary items, you still have the 2nd amendment protected, and you probably have less of those "oh look at the cool semi-automatic assault rifle I have. I may have a small d**** but I got a big a**weapon".

EDIT: FH - check the profanity filter. I edited my post. It let a couple words through.

I got a better idea, take the taxes that are going to these human slaughter houses, called abortion clinics, and use that money to arm people at our schools to protect our children, rather than slaughtering them.

[phins_4_ever]

I got a better idea, take the taxes that are going to these human slaughter houses, called abortion clinics, and use that money to arm people at our schools to protect our children, rather than slaughtering them.

We could also eliminate the non profit status of churches and religious organizations who feed you such BS.

[jared81]

We could also eliminate the non profit status of churches and religious organizations who feed you such BS.

Dont need a church to tell me right from wrong. Abortion is constitutional, therefore it should be legal. However, if you have an abortion, you are a terribe person, except for the rare case ofrape.

[MoFinz]

They cant even agree on a tax for millionaires in this country.

Talk about a pipe dream. And who's going to pay for the people that collect and manage the tax revenues?

[phins_4_ever]

They cant even agree on a tax for millionaires in this country.

Talk about a pipe dream. And who's going to pay for the people that collect and manage the tax revenues?

That was my point. My ridiculous idea is as ridiculous as forcing school employees to carry guns. What if the entire staff of a school is against it? Government going to force guns on school property? Are we making a salary difference between gun carrying teachers and non-gun carrying teachers like in the security industry?
And what guarantee do we have that a teacher is actually pulling the trigger? And what is a teacher or school employee going to do if he or she faces the gun toting person from behind? Shoot him/her in the back?

Besides the cost of such legislation there are many more intangible involved then a gun restricting legislature without touching the 2nd amendment.