Welcome to FinHeaven Fans Forums! We're glad to have you here. Please feel free to browse the forum. We'd like to invite you to join our community; doing so will enable you to view additional forums and post with our other members.



VIP Members don't see these ads.Join VIP Now
Page 5 of 6 FirstFirst 123456 LastLast
Results 41 to 50 of 53

Thread: Sotomayor refuses to block morning-after pill rule

  1. -41
    phins_4_ever's Avatar
    FinHeaven VIP

    Status:
    Offline
    WPA:
    Join date:
    Oct 2008
    Posts:
    2,088
    vCash:
    1700
    Thanks / No Thanks

    To view links or images in this forum your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
    Originally Posted by MoFinz
    To view links or images in this forum your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
    Psssst......

    Viagra and Cialis were both originally designed to treat hypertension. Erections were the marketable side effects after they failed the hypertension tests.


    To view links or images in this forum your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
    Got a link?
    I doubt that the 'side effect' was solving erectile disfunction.


    To view links or images in this forum your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
    ___________________________________________________________________________________________________________

  2. -42
    spydertl79's Avatar
    Hall Of Famer

    Status:
    Offline
    WPA:
    Join date:
    Jul 2004
    Posts:
    8,807
    vCash:
    500
    Loc:
    Ft. Lauderdale
    Thanks / No Thanks

    To view links or images in this forum your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.


    muffinz winswins
    "As scarce as truth is, the supply has always been in excess of the demand."
    Henry Wheeler Shaw

  3. -43
    Abhenne7's Avatar
    Dolphins4lyfe

    Status:
    Offline
    WPA:
    Join date:
    Jan 2010
    Posts:
    793
    vCash:
    500
    Loc:
    Miami, FL
    Thanks / No Thanks
    Another justice who doesnt give a damn about human life. Not surprised

  4. -44
    spydertl79's Avatar
    Hall Of Famer

    Status:
    Offline
    WPA:
    Join date:
    Jul 2004
    Posts:
    8,807
    vCash:
    500
    Loc:
    Ft. Lauderdale
    Thanks / No Thanks

    To view links or images in this forum your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
    Originally Posted by Abhenne7
    To view links or images in this forum your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
    Another justice who doesnt give a damn about human life. Not surprised
    Another poster who doesn't read other people's posts before interjecting

  5. -45
    Statler Waldorf's Avatar
    Bench Warmer

    Status:
    Offline
    WPA:
    Join date:
    Jun 2005
    Posts:
    1,209
    vCash:
    500
    Loc:
    Oregon
    Thanks / No Thanks


    To view links or images in this forum your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
    Originally Posted by Locke
    To view links or images in this forum your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
    Companies aren't churches, smart guy. The supreme court just said so. A person can individually be opposed to it, but they can't force their views on their employees. That's freedom of religion. Or does that only apply when Christians are told they can't do something? It must be nice to play the game of life by two different sets of rules eh? ****ing hypocrite...
    Well you missed my point “smart guy”. You were objecting to someone trying to force their personal beliefs on others but you are trying to force your personal beliefs on people who own companies.


    To view links or images in this forum your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
    Originally Posted by GoFins!
    To view links or images in this forum your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
    If one side is able to argue from an idealistic point of view that guns can magically be uninvented (or criminals can magically be made to become law-abiding citizens) then why is the other side not allowed argue from the realistic point of view that doing things in a certain order (education then marriage then baby) generally makes for a better life for both the mother and child?
    Bingo! If everyone waited until marriage to have sex, and if everyone only had sex with one person in their lives we’d have no AIDS epidemic, no STDs, and the number of abortions would reduce greatly. You know as well as I do that the Left would have a cow if we tried passing a “Premarital sex and divorce ban” in congress even though they try to use the same arguments to justify forms of gun legislation. They have no problems with banning other people’s rights but when it comes to their own…hands off!
    Total Depravity
    Unconditional Election
    Limited Atonement
    Irresistible Grace
    Perseverance of the Saints

  6. -46
    phins_4_ever's Avatar
    FinHeaven VIP

    Status:
    Offline
    WPA:
    Join date:
    Oct 2008
    Posts:
    2,088
    vCash:
    1700
    Thanks / No Thanks

    To view links or images in this forum your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
    Originally Posted by spydertl79
    To view links or images in this forum your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

    To view links or images in this forum your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.


    muffinz winswins
    He does? Because a radio host says so?

  7. -47
    MoFinz's Avatar
    Uwe Von Schamann's Bastard Son

    Status:
    Offline
    WPA:
    Join date:
    May 2002
    Posts:
    3,054
    vCash:
    7000
    Thanks / No Thanks

    To view links or images in this forum your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
    Originally Posted by phins_4_ever
    To view links or images in this forum your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
    Got a link?
    I doubt that the 'side effect' was solving erectile disfunction.


    To view links or images in this forum your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
    Doubt all you want....as usual, you are wrong again
    To view links or images in this forum your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

    •Viagra originally developed to treat angina sufferers was later discovered to help the cause of erectile dysfunction. Uprima is a fairly new revolutionary drug used to treat Erectile Dysfunction also.

    To view links or images in this forum your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

    To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.


    Fat, drunk and stupid is no way to go through life

  8. -48
    Starter

    Status:
    Offline
    WPA:
    Join date:
    Aug 2010
    Posts:
    225
    vCash:
    500
    Thanks / No Thanks
    The morning after pill suppresses ovulation. Only rarely does it affect implementation. People who call it an abortion pill are just misinformed. If you're against the morning after pill then you'd have to be against standard birth control.

  9. -49
    Statler Waldorf's Avatar
    Bench Warmer

    Status:
    Offline
    WPA:
    Join date:
    Jun 2005
    Posts:
    1,209
    vCash:
    500
    Loc:
    Oregon
    Thanks / No Thanks

    To view links or images in this forum your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
    Originally Posted by JackFinfan
    To view links or images in this forum your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
    The morning after pill suppresses ovulation. Only rarely does it affect implementation. People who call it an abortion pill are just misinformed. If you're against the morning after pill then you'd have to be against standard birth control.

    Hey Jack I haven’t seen you around for a while, how have you been? I do not believe you are correct here though, suppressing ovulation takes far too long in order to work as an effective emergency contraceptive, rather a high dose of birth control is given in order to prevent implantation of a fertilized egg (I realize many people like to challenge this idea but this is still how the drug works according to the FDA). The only reason this is no longer considered to be an abortion is because a few years ago “pregnancy” was redefined in order to help the drug companies market their product.

  10. -50
    Starter

    Status:
    Offline
    WPA:
    Join date:
    Aug 2010
    Posts:
    225
    vCash:
    500
    Thanks / No Thanks

    To view links or images in this forum your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
    Originally Posted by Statler Waldorf
    To view links or images in this forum your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
    Hey Jack I haven’t seen you around for a while, how have you been? I do not believe you are correct here though, suppressing ovulation takes far too long in order to work as an effective emergency contraceptive, rather a high dose of birth control is given in order to prevent implantation of a fertilized egg (I realize many people like to challenge this idea but this is still how the drug works according to the FDA). The only reason this is no longer considered to be an abortion is because a few years ago “pregnancy” was redefined in order to help the drug companies market their product.
    I'm still here reading everything, just not posting as much (busy studying for my CPA tests). I remember reading that the morning after pill prevented implantation as much as standard birth control. In fact, many anti-inflammatory medications prevented implantation just as much as the morning after pill.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •