Welcome to FinHeaven Fans Forums! We're glad to have you here. Please feel free to browse the forum. We'd like to invite you to join our community; doing so will enable you to view additional forums and post with our other members.



VIP Members don't see these ads.Join VIP Now
Page 3 of 5 FirstFirst 12345 LastLast
Results 21 to 30 of 49

Thread: WR Comparison: Jennings/Bowe/Wallace

  1. -21
    TheWalrus's Avatar
    L'armée des ombres

    Status:
    Offline
    WPA:
    Join date:
    Dec 2011
    Posts:
    3,036
    vCash:
    502
    Thanks / No Thanks

    To view links or images in this forum your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
    Originally Posted by SQuinn17
    To view links or images in this forum your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
    I think Bower and Jennings are the most realistic options. I think someone is going to drastically overpay for Wallace and I don't think it'll be us. Remember last year that this guy wanted as much money as Larry Firzgerald? That's outrageous.
    Fitzgerald is the highest paid wide receiver in the league and that's how every receiver wants to get paid. You really think Wallace isn't signing on the dotted line until someone offers $50 million guaranteed and ~$13 million per year? I don't.

    Here's a link to the highest paid wide receivers in the league this year. Note a few of these are "franchise tag" deals.


    To view links or images in this forum your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.


    Vincent Jackson, you'll see, did get Larry Fitzgerald money. And he played well this year, too. Averaging more than 19 yards per reception for 1,300 yards, despite missing a game.

    Wallace is worth a deal more in the $8-10 million range, probably closer to $10 million. If you want a player of his caliber, that's what they cost. He's every bit the player Santonio Holmes is, in my view. Pittsburgh used him sort of one dimensionally but he has a ton of versatility. Jennings for his part would cost less but not as much less as people think. Probably in the $6 to $7 million range annually.

  2. -22
    3rdandinches's Avatar
    Seasoned Veteran

    Status:
    Offline
    WPA:
    Join date:
    Mar 2006
    Posts:
    6,271
    vCash:
    500
    Loc:
    Lah, lah land
    Thanks / No Thanks
    I don't know why people think we have an inside chance to land Jennings. Just because Philbin is here doesn't mean Jennings would prefer to be here. He could very well want to play with Luck/Manning/Brady or whomever.

    I'd love to sign the guy but I don't think we have any advantage over any other team in this league, well except the Jest because they suck.

  3. -23
    LikeUntoGod's Avatar
    The Oracle

    Status:
    Offline
    WPA:
    Join date:
    Jul 2006
    Posts:
    3,264
    vCash:
    500
    Loc:
    Gainesville Florida
    Thanks / No Thanks
    Jennings is the only one I'd take. Bowe and Wallace are problems children, they want WAY to much money and Wallace has not played well in what should have been his best season (if for no other reason to get a new, huge contract). C Gates could have been our long ball threat for a 1/20th of what Wallace is demanding.

    TE Jermichael Finley is a slacker, he is a player that someone will think they can turn around but I would not touch him.

    If we want to bring someone in, bring in a winner and a good locker room guy. With the new CBA, rookies are so much cheaper (Jake Long anyone) then player's drafted 3 years ago or more. Just because we finally have a lot of cap money does not mean we waste it. I'd rather overpay a great Free Agent corner then any WR.

    We need speed at WR but we also need speed on defense.

    To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

    To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

  4. -24
    LikeUntoGod's Avatar
    The Oracle

    Status:
    Offline
    WPA:
    Join date:
    Jul 2006
    Posts:
    3,264
    vCash:
    500
    Loc:
    Gainesville Florida
    Thanks / No Thanks
    Jennings is the only one I'd take. Bowe and Wallace are problems children, they want WAY to much money and Wallace has not played well in what should have been his best season (if for no other reason to get a new, huge contract). C Gates could have been our long ball threat for a 1/20th of what Wallace is demanding.

    TE Jermichael Finley is a slacker, he is a player that someone will think they can turn around but I would not touch him.


    Good list of targets 3 inches

    FA Signings
    WR G.Jennings 9mil
    TE J.Cook 4mil
    DE M.Johnson 7mil
    CB Q.Jammer 5mil
    CB D.Cox 7mil


    If we want to bring someone in, bring in a winner and a good locker room guy. With the new CBA, rookies are so much cheaper (Jake Long anyone) then player's drafted 3 years ago or more. Just because we finally have a lot of cap money does not mean we waste it. I'd rather overpay a great Free Agent corner then any WR.

    We need speed at WR but we also need speed on defense.

  5. -25
    unknown quantity

    Status:
    Offline
    WPA:
    Join date:
    Aug 2008
    Posts:
    914
    vCash:
    500
    Thanks / No Thanks
    this years free agent market is going to be a buyers market. the big money deals will be hard to come by for 2013 free agents. we can sign anyone we want. this is from the man in charge.....

  6. -26
    Starter

    Status:
    Offline
    WPA:
    Join date:
    Sep 2004
    Posts:
    1,713
    vCash:
    500
    Thanks / No Thanks
    Wallace = overrated and not worth the money.

    Bowe = sucks and a bad seed. nothing more than a stats guy on a bad team.

    Jennings = I'd take him at a reasonable contract that takes into account his age and injury plagued season. Risk.

  7. -27
    da1nonlydre16's Avatar
    Scout Team

    Status:
    Offline
    WPA:
    Join date:
    Apr 2010
    Posts:
    63
    vCash:
    500
    Loc:
    Broward
    Thanks / No Thanks
    I'd pass on all three and send a third to Philly for Jeremy Maclin and draft a receiver in the first two rounds.

  8. -28
    3rdandinches's Avatar
    Seasoned Veteran

    Status:
    Offline
    WPA:
    Join date:
    Mar 2006
    Posts:
    6,271
    vCash:
    500
    Loc:
    Lah, lah land
    Thanks / No Thanks
    I would think with J.Philbin getting rid of B.Marshall that would let everyone know that D.Bowe is not coming here.

    Where my 1st choice is to bring in Jennings I could certainly see us going draft only with new offensive weapons.

  9. -29
    FinHeaven VIP

    Status:
    Offline
    WPA:
    Join date:
    May 2009
    Posts:
    4,235
    vCash:
    500
    Thanks / No Thanks
    I'm happy with any of the three but, favor Bowe. IMO, he fills our biggest WR need in the red zone. He has 6 drops this year, and 24 over 3 years, which is average. If not for the injury concerns, I might give Jennings a slight edge, as he is also a VG in the red zone.

  10. -30
    R&R Express's Avatar
    mediocrity sucks

    Status:
    Offline
    WPA:
    Join date:
    Aug 2005
    Posts:
    12,705
    vCash:
    40790
    Loc:
    Roanoke, Virginia
    Thanks / No Thanks

    To view links or images in this forum your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
    Originally Posted by Mogwai
    To view links or images in this forum your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
    For ****'s sake is the WCO is being dragged out again as an excuse to avoid talented speed receivers? If anyone watched this year, we haven't abandoned deep routes we've just lacked the personnel to execute them properly. This offense is starved for speed and we have the chance to bring in maybe the best deep threat in the league. I have trouble calling Wallace overrated when he has more TDs through his first 4 years in the league than our entire WR corp combined over that span.
    It never fails does it. SMH at some people.

    To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •