Welcome to FinHeaven Fans Forums! We're glad to have you here. Please feel free to browse the forum. We'd like to invite you to join our community; doing so will enable you to view additional forums and post with our other members.



VIP Members don't see these ads.Join VIP Now
Page 2 of 11 FirstFirst 1234567 ... LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 108

Thread: Hartline had more yards than Wallace, Bowe, or Jennings in 2012.

  1. -11
    Wildbill3's Avatar
    FinHeaven is a site by fans for the fans

    Status:
    Offline
    WPA:
    Join date:
    Dec 2001
    Posts:
    21,562
    vCash:
    200
    Loc:
    Kentucky
    Thanks / No Thanks

    To view links or images in this forum your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
    Originally Posted by fanfin
    To view links or images in this forum your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
    he only scored 6 points for us that is why
    Sorry I was unaware that there was a 100 yards between the endzone. I guess we should flip a coin to see if we score on any given drive. "someone" has to move the ball, might as well keep a guy who's proven to help move the ball.

    To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

  2. -12
    Pro Bowler

    Status:
    Offline
    WPA:
    Join date:
    Apr 2010
    Posts:
    1,012
    vCash:
    500
    Loc:
    Jersey
    Thanks / No Thanks
    Besides the fact that he seems to get tackled by phantom contact I really like Hartline. If you watched the tape this year teams always had help over the top for him. He isn't a number 1 but he got covered like one this year and still finished with some very good numbers. I think we should trade Bess, sign Jennings and draft a receiver like Allen. Hartline, Jennings and Allen are a good core. Then it would allow us to double up on TE this year with Eifert (trade up) and Jordan Reed. That would be a damn good receiving core.

  3. -13
    dolfin530's Avatar
    Student of the Game

    Status:
    Offline
    WPA:
    Join date:
    Jul 2008
    Posts:
    556
    vCash:
    500
    Loc:
    SC
    Thanks / No Thanks
    Jennings had injuries, Bowe had bad QB's, and Wallace held out. Doesn't matter Hartline will be back and we need one of these guys on the opposite side.

  4. -14
    finfan54's Avatar
    FinHeaven VIP

    Status:
    Offline
    WPA:
    Join date:
    Aug 2002
    Posts:
    21,182
    vCash:
    500
    Loc:
    CRAPCHESTER
    Thanks / No Thanks

    To view links or images in this forum your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
    Originally Posted by normaldude
    To view links or images in this forum your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
    Why do so many Finheaven posters want to get rid of Brian Hartline?

    He's not a superstar, but he's a solid #2, has developed chemistry with Tannehill, and we should definitely keep him.
    And if he ends up being our #3 that is one hell of an offense if you ask me.

    To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

    AIR JORDAN

  5. -15
    Pro Bowler

    Status:
    Offline
    WPA:
    Join date:
    Jun 2004
    Posts:
    5,481
    vCash:
    500
    Loc:
    Haines City, Fl
    Thanks / No Thanks
    Only Dolphin fans could look at a 1,000 yard receiver and say he sucks and act like anyone proclaiming he has value is an idiot. You don't have to be a TD machine to be a useful offensive piece. In all likelihood I see us bringing in someone else and Hartline moving on, but Hartline is probably going to pull a Welker and have a number of good seasons in an offense with more talent on the field.

  6. -16
    Rookie

    Status:
    Offline
    WPA:
    Join date:
    Jan 2008
    Posts:
    13
    vCash:
    500
    Thanks / No Thanks
    Hartline is a good-average player and that's are problem we just have a bunch of good-average players and we need some great impact players...but he does do a good job between the 20s and he should have a place on our team as a complementry player not as a go to guy like he was this year

  7. -17
    jlfin's Avatar
    old pro

    Status:
    Offline
    WPA:
    Join date:
    Mar 2005
    Posts:
    7,155
    vCash:
    500
    Loc:
    windermere
    Thanks / No Thanks
    As Dave Hyde wrote after the game. Hartline may have been auditioning for Bellicheck. He's exactly the type of player the Pats covet. Hard working and intelligent.
    Welker didn't score much as a phin either.
    The cynic knows the price of everything, but the value of nothing
    -Oscar Wilde

  8. -18
    Waterlogged

    Status:
    Offline
    WPA:
    Join date:
    Jan 2011
    Posts:
    1,050
    vCash:
    500
    Thanks / No Thanks
    I'll take Jennings and Keenan Allen.

    The reason we want him to walk is because if we go get Jennings, we wont be able to afford more receivers other than in the draft. So we want Jennings more.

  9. -19
    finfan54's Avatar
    FinHeaven VIP

    Status:
    Offline
    WPA:
    Join date:
    Aug 2002
    Posts:
    21,182
    vCash:
    500
    Loc:
    CRAPCHESTER
    Thanks / No Thanks
    besides, if you get more WR/TE's going in this offense it would stand to reason he would score more TD's. Hartline dives for balls and is great at the sideline, but he catches alot of those balls that others cannot. He also was double covered yesterday and still burned them. Hartline is one guy I would not mind overpaying for a little if neccessary because BB has his eye on him. take it to the bank.

    ---------- Post added at 11:27 PM ---------- Previous post was at 11:25 PM ----------


    To view links or images in this forum your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
    Originally Posted by MiamiNative0722
    To view links or images in this forum your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
    I'll take Jennings and Keenan Allen.

    The reason we want him to walk is because if we go get Jennings, we wont be able to afford more receivers other than in the draft. So we want Jennings more.
    I'll take Jennings and Stedman Bailey. more versatile.

  10. -20
    Gonzo's Avatar
    Administrator

    Status:
    Online
    WPA:
    Join date:
    Mar 2004
    Posts:
    17,373
    vCash:
    9600
    Loc:
    Brooklyn
    Thanks / No Thanks
    This is the biggest problem with fantasy football. People spend more time checking out NFL.com's stats site than actually watching the games. I don't want to get rid of Hartline, but if you think Hartline is anywhere near the WR any of those other three are, you don't have the slightest clue what you're talking about.

    To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.






Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •