My goodness Te'o

[-=DolfanDave=-]

Well thank you for letting me know you didn't watch their tape, but that stat argument is hilarious I can plug so many holes in it it's not even worth it.

Tape? who watches tape anymore? is this 1993?

I've seen both play and I think you're, at the very least, splitting hairs. And, yes, stats matter. While they're not everything, they matter. Numbers can lie, but in this case, the numbers don't even compare which could be why you're not too fond of them.

[TheWarriorFins]

Tape? who watches tape anymore? is this 1993?

I've seen both play and I think you're, at the very least, splitting hairs. And, yes, stats matter. While they're not everything, they matter. Numbers can lie, but in this case, the numbers don't even compare which could be why you're not too fond of them.

Unbelievable so you're saying screw tape, GMs draft based on stats ? Oh my lord stop embarrassing yourself. How drop the numbers not compare? Te'o only has 4 more interceptions while last season Te'o had 90 more tackles and a TD? IS THAT U IRELAND?

[-=DolfanDave=-]

Unbelievable so you're saying screw tape GMs draft based on stats ? Oh my lord stop embarrassing yourself. How drop the numbers not compare? Te'o only has 4 more interceptions while last season Te'o had 90 more tackles and a TD? IS THAT U IRELAND?

lol, no.... i'm saying, who calls it tape anymore? its video, if anything. Calling it tape makes me think of VHS.

oh god... what have i done
To view links or images in this forum your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

[TheWarriorFins]

lol, no.... i'm saying, who calls it tape anymore? its video, if anything. Calling it tape makes me think of VHS.

oh god... what have i done
To view links or images in this forum your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

Way to ignore my argument on that retarded logic of yours that post was hilarious and no one watches tape it's saying for video like you said, I have NFL rewind. But to continue exposing that hilarious argument of "stats" which was wrong to begin with saying Te'o is on another level than Luke (LOL seriously were you drunk?) should we draft stedman baily over keenan allen because the stats aren't close
To view links or images in this forum your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
. Seriously that post was comical

[-=DolfanDave=-]

Way to ignore my argument on that retarded logic of yours that post was hilarious and no one watches tape it's saying for video like you said, I have NFL rewind. But to continue exposing that hilarious argument of "stats" which was wrong to begin with saying Te'o is on another level than Luke (LOL seriously were you drunk?) should we draft stedman baily over keenan allen because the stats aren't close
To view links or images in this forum your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
. Seriously that post was comical

How am I ignoring your argument? I responded to your post stating that I dont think GM should evaluate players using video footage, which i never once said.

But, go ahead. Call my logic retarded, if that makes you feel better. Have fun arguing with yourself.

Lets start over. Hi, my name is Dave.

[TheWarriorFins]

How am I ignoring your argument? I responded to your post stating that I dont think GM should evaluate players using video footage, which i never once said.

But, go ahead. Call my logic retarded, if that makes you feel better. Have fun arguing with yourself.

Lets start over. Hi, my name is Dave.

First you said Te'o had a better season stats wise and it wasn't close and that was completely false, then based on your "stats" logic GM should draft on who has the better stats and if their not close like Stedman Baily over Keenan Allen in that stat department we should basically without thought draft stedman baily because of stats. What do you mean GMs shouldn't evaluate a player on footage, they all do it and everyone prepares for other teams by looking at their footage. How should we evaluate players then? What do you think those mock drafts you see on the internet are based on? Do you know how coaches grade performances of players after a game? they don't look at the stats they see what they did on film to correct mistakes or give props. GM use film/footage/tape w/e you want to call it to evaluate players all the time.

[-=DolfanDave=-]

1) reread my posts. I said stats aren't everything.

2) I never said researching a player using game footage was a bad thing or that gms dont do that.

You really are arguing with yourself. Have fun with that.

[TheWarriorFins]

1) reread my posts. I said stats aren't everything.

2) I never said researching a player using game footage was a bad thing or that gms dont do that.

You really are arguing with yourself. Have fun with that.

you said "I dont think GM should evaluate players using video footage"How are you not saying it's a bad way of evaluating players? And you did in fact say when stats don't even compare or in other words have much superior stats that they pretty much determine who's better although you used that with Te'o and Luke when in fact it wasn't true because you never looked into it when you made that dumbass statement but let's act like you didn't because that was embarrassing.


So let's bring up all your gems you posted in this thread:

"Compare stats, or whatever else you want, and Te'o is just better. "

"I dont think GM should evaluate players using video footage"

"Te'o Heisman candidate" (as if it means anything now a days and worth using in an argument against Luke vs Te'o)

was he in the running for the heisman? (Refering to luke as if it was a knock on him)

[DudeleBroski]

How drunk are you guys?

[ROADRUNNER]

All i can say is.......Te'o i hope it was just a one off, man you were bad last night.