Welcome to FinHeaven Fans Forums! We're glad to have you here. Please feel free to browse the forum. We'd like to invite you to join our community; doing so will enable you to view additional forums and post with our other members.



VIP Members don't see these ads.Join VIP Now
Results 1 to 9 of 9

Thread: OT situation. Long Vs Martin

  1. -1
    zach8111's Avatar
    Pro Bowler

    Status:
    Offline
    WPA:
    Join date:
    Mar 2007
    Posts:
    3,083
    vCash:
    500
    Loc:
    Fremont, Ohio
    Thanks / No Thanks

    OT situation. Long Vs Martin

    Everyone on here wants to bash long for not playing very well and want to let him walk but can we afford to have martin as Ryan's blindside blocker? Its a given that Long is gonna get a big contract where ever he goes, but just how big. I live in ohio and dont see many of the games, but judging by the consensus around here,you guys want to let jake walk because martin did a serviceable job this season including his time at LT. Well here is an interesting stat that tells otherwise. I under stand a lot of the reason people dont want to resign long is because of the contract or decline of play this season but he is still one of the top LTs in the game and if we can get him for anything around 10 mill a year, you have to keep him

    Per rotoworld
    Dolphins OT Jonathan Martin's 47 quarterback hurries were the most among offensive tackles in 2012.


    After moving to left tackle in early December, Martin allowed 17 hurries in just under five games. Jake Long had allowed 10 hurries in just over 11 games. With Long seemingly determined to land a market-setting deal, the Dolphins could have major pass protection issues in 2013.

  2. -2
    dlockz's Avatar
    Hall Of Famer

    Status:
    Offline
    WPA:
    Join date:
    Sep 2004
    Posts:
    27,719
    vCash:
    625
    Loc:
    Tampa Fl
    Thanks / No Thanks

    To view links or images in this forum your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
    Originally Posted by zach8111
    To view links or images in this forum your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
    Everyone on here wants to bash long for not playing very well and want to let him walk but can we afford to have martin as Ryan's blindside blocker? Its a given that Long is gonna get a big contract where ever he goes, but just how big. I live in ohio and dont see many of the games, but judging by the consensus around here,you guys want to let jake walk because martin did a serviceable job this season including his time at LT. Well here is an interesting stat that tells otherwise. I under stand a lot of the reason people dont want to resign long is because of the contract or decline of play this season but he is still one of the top LTs in the game and if we can get him for anything around 10 mill a year, you have to keep him

    Per rotoworld
    well if long wants a market setting deal good luck with that. Why would 10 million be a good number to keep him , I definately dont get it. so u basically him Joe Thomas money ok then
    When Death Smiles Upon You the Infantryman smiles back

  3. -3
    Pro Bowler

    Status:
    Offline
    WPA:
    Join date:
    Nov 2004
    Posts:
    2,558
    vCash:
    500
    Thanks / No Thanks
    Jakes play is not the "main" concern, the main concern is what else could the team do with the money. We tried the proven method of get a LT and then build. Yes we now just have a QB that looks fairly promising, but I think it is time for a change in how the money is spread around. If they go that route I'm OK with it. For the right money of course you keep him.
    I support our new Coach and Quarterback. Go Miami! But they still have to prove they are the future, we've been fooled too many times!

  4. -4
    dlockz's Avatar
    Hall Of Famer

    Status:
    Offline
    WPA:
    Join date:
    Sep 2004
    Posts:
    27,719
    vCash:
    625
    Loc:
    Tampa Fl
    Thanks / No Thanks
    any team spending well that much on tackle esp a losing team really needs to look at thier front office

  5. -5
    Awsi Dooger's Avatar
    Hall Of Famer

    Status:
    Offline
    WPA:
    Join date:
    Feb 2005
    Posts:
    5,293
    vCash:
    500
    Loc:
    Las Vegas
    Thanks / No Thanks
    Martin is frustrating. I've been looking at his late season games. On most plays he's fine, and seems more active and energetic than recent Jake Long. Bouncy feet. But Martin's bad plays are off the chart bad. He loses balance and can't recover. Panics and bends solely at the waist. On those plays it's glaring that he's not a natural athlete. Strength alone won't fix it.

    Seems like a player who will be fine against lower and moderate opposition but be exposed up the ladder.

  6. -6
    jlfin's Avatar
    old pro

    Status:
    Offline
    WPA:
    Join date:
    Mar 2005
    Posts:
    7,165
    vCash:
    500
    Loc:
    windermere
    Thanks / No Thanks

    To view links or images in this forum your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
    Originally Posted by Awsi Dooger
    To view links or images in this forum your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
    Martin is frustrating. I've been looking at his late season games. On most plays he's fine, and seems more active and energetic than recent Jake Long. Bouncy feet. But Martin's bad plays are off the chart bad. He loses balance and can't recover. Panics and bends solely at the waist. On those plays it's glaring that he's not a natural athlete. Strength alone won't fix it.

    Seems like a player who will be fine against lower and moderate opposition but be exposed up the ladder.
    In other words, rookies are never capable of developing their skills or improving on weaknesses. You are correct, if an O-lineman doesn't play like a pro bowler his rookie season, he can never develop into one. Its never happened before in the history of the NFL.
    The cynic knows the price of everything, but the value of nothing
    -Oscar Wilde

  7. -7
    Waterlogged

    Status:
    Offline
    WPA:
    Join date:
    Jan 2006
    Posts:
    10,111
    vCash:
    500
    Loc:
    Miami, FL
    Thanks / No Thanks
    Thankfully Dan Snyder is in the NFL and he will do us a favor and make Jake Long the highest paid tackle in NFL history.

  8. -8
    sinPHIN's Avatar
    Perennial All-Pro

    Status:
    Offline
    WPA:
    Join date:
    Mar 2007
    Posts:
    4,979
    vCash:
    500
    Thanks / No Thanks
    the problem is the money. long isnt worth what he wants hell he isnt worth 10 mil a year. there are impact positions that are a much bigger need. paying jake just makes us a worse team. if jake takes a pay cut then im all for him coming back

    To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

  9. -9
    finomenal's Avatar
    Pro Bowler

    Status:
    Offline
    WPA:
    Join date:
    Jan 2009
    Posts:
    1,701
    vCash:
    1200
    Loc:
    Fort Lauderdale, FL
    Thanks / No Thanks

    OT situation. Long Vs Martin


    To view links or images in this forum your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
    Originally Posted by zach8111
    To view links or images in this forum your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
    Everyone on here wants to bash long for not playing very well and want to let him walk but can we afford to have martin as Ryan's blindside blocker? Its a given that Long is gonna get a big contract where ever he goes, but just how big. I live in ohio and dont see many of the games, but judging by the consensus around here,you guys want to let jake walk because martin did a serviceable job this season including his time at LT. Well here is an interesting stat that tells otherwise. I under stand a lot of the reason people dont want to resign long is because of the contract or decline of play this season but he is still one of the top LTs in the game and if we can get him for anything around 10 mill a year, you have to keep him

    Per rotoworld
    Don't continue to be brainwashed by the outdated philosophy of Bill Parcells. You don't need to select a tackle with the first overall pick in the draft, let alone anywhere in the first round. Look at all the successful teams, and tell me if you even remember the names of the tackles.
    Trophy #3 is coming in June.
    Follow me on Twitter @Ryan17Tannehill





    To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.


Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •