It's his job to be thought provoking. The more so the better as that is what people like to read. He has deadlines just like any other journalist does. How about looking at the actual merit of each article's point(s) rather than dismiss everything because it may have a negative or critical stance?
To view links or images in this forum your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
Originally Posted by Nublar7
To view links or images in this forum your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
Newsflash: the Miami Dolphins franchise has been downtrodden for years. There are only so many times a writer can do the silver lining glass half full "well it was a better than expected season considering they were rebuilding!" piece and pontificate about what they are going to do this offseason. The dude has to write an article a day it seems. They aren't all going to be winners, man.
I'm not defending Salguero personally, either. I am simply being as objective as possible. The person who wrote the e mail/letter to Armando did in fact bring up a valid point and during what is obviously a very slow time for any Dolphins related news, there frankly is just going to be **** like this. You always being Super Apologist #1 is really no better than the negative ass you perceive Armando to be.



Reply With Quote


Bookmarks