For the most part I agree with what you are saying. For example, I'd rather have the ONLY undefeated team, but if you ask me whether I would prefer Hall of Fame Bob Griese or Hall of Fame Dan Marino, I'd pick Marino as a player but the 1972 team. I think we can both agree that Marino was better than Griese.
To view links or images in this forum your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
Originally Posted by z926538
To view links or images in this forum your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
By the win/loss/team achievement model, Griese's team was better than Montana's, and I suspect that if Rice, Taylor and Craig had left for the World Football League, Montana's legacy would.have been quite a bit more modest. In fact, even after the NFL started to figure out how to play the WCO San Francisco had great success with the ex-Tampa Bay QB Steve Young. Still, neither San Francisco QB could manage an undefeated season, so I guess Montana/Young isn't as good as Griese/Morall. Unless I missed.something, WINNING All of the games including the Super Bowl (sorry Brady, that's gotta hurt) is still the best.
To view links or images in this forum your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
I don't think we are really disagreeing honestly, it's all about the team and winning. But IMHO we can judge a single player in a team setting by more than simply the team performance. But, it's all good.
To view links or images in this forum your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.




Reply With Quote
Bookmarks