ANOTHER leaked logo?

[dirwuf]

You can tell it's not legit. The site has those little "preview" boxes in the bottom right hand corner that are highlighted orange when the picture is one the screen. The first one is highlighted (thus the picture that should be on the screen) and the little preview picture looks nothing like the picture on the screen. Probably photoshopped to screw with people.

Perhaps, or it could be someone actually working on the website...

[buffal0s0uljah]

You can tell it's not legit. The site has those little "preview" boxes in the bottom right hand corner that are highlighted orange when the picture is one the screen. The first one is highlighted (thus the picture that should be on the screen) and the little preview picture looks nothing like the picture on the screen. Probably photoshopped to screw with people.

Good catch. It even looks like the guy has photoshop open on his taskbar (the blue square icon next to mozilla).

[Nublar7]

You can tell it's not legit. The site has those little "preview" boxes in the bottom right hand corner that are highlighted orange when the picture is one the screen. The first one is highlighted (thus the picture that should be on the screen) and the little preview picture looks nothing like the picture on the screen. Probably photoshopped to screw with people.

Also look at the address in the URL bar. It should just be
To view links or images in this forum your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
, yet the address looks much longer than that. Probably a photo and not an actual web address. Makes me think it is a photoshopped picture. If someone came across the logo by accident, don't you think you would make sure to take a good photo of it? Or a screen capture. Seems to me like the blurriness is a way to help cover up that it is fake.

[houtz]

If this is the logo the said person would be creating the home page for the revealing of the new logo. Of course the URL would be longer.

[SkapePhin]

Interesting... That could be the dolphin, but not the final logo. It looks like they took creative liberties with the dolphin design to make it the "D" for this particular image. The Dolphin in the logo will undoubtedly have the sunburst behind it and be pointed in the opposite direction.

The one thing I question about this leak... Why is the current (old) logo still up at the top of the mockup?

[Shaman]

You can tell it's not legit. The site has those little "preview" boxes in the bottom right hand corner that are highlighted orange when the picture is one the screen. The first one is highlighted (thus the picture that should be on the screen) and the little preview picture looks nothing like the picture on the screen. Probably photoshopped to screw with people.

EDIT: Now that I stare at it longer, I'm not totally sure it's not the preview. Plus it's in a cubicle. Like trying to figure out conspiracy theories.

It actually does look like the one highlighted in the preview box.

[dirwuf]

As the OP, I've tracked the source of this photo back a bit further to here...


To view links or images in this forum your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

[silverfin]

Interesting... That could be the dolphin, but not the final logo. It looks like they took creative liberties with the dolphin design to make it the "D" for this particular image. The Dolphin in the logo will undoubtedly have the sunburst behind it and be pointed in the opposite direction.

The one thing I question about this leak... Why is the current (old) logo still up at the top of the mockup?

If somebody did upload that to the site (highly unlikely) then it got taken down pretty quickly because they weren't ready for it to be seen yet, it sure isn't on the site anymore. If it was in the top left then they'd be ready to unveil it, which would mean the "new era of dolphins football" article would still be on the site.

I don't think it's' legit for reasons people have already pointed out, but that "new logo" don't look half bad.

[SkapePhin]

If somebody did upload that to the site (highly unlikely) then it got taken down pretty quickly because they weren't ready for it to be seen yet, it sure isn't on the site anymore. If it was in the top left then they'd be ready to unveil it, which would mean the "new era of dolphins football" article would still be on the site.

I don't think it's' legit for reasons people have already pointed out, but that "new logo" don't look half bad.

I never got the impression that this was ever put live onto the website. IMO, this is a shot of a dev version of the site that the web guys are working on. That would explain the "rushed" look of the photo. Someone was trying not to get caught snapping a picture of "classified" stuff at work.

[silverfin]

I never got the impression that this was ever put live onto the website. IMO, this is a shot of a dev version of the site that the web guys are working on. That would explain the "rushed" look of the photo. Someone was trying not to get caught snapping a picture of "classified" stuff at work.

That could be true, although I don't think it would be worth losing your job over.

I'm pretty sure it's a photoshop anyway.