Welcome to FinHeaven Fans Forums! We're glad to have you here. Please feel free to browse the forum. We'd like to invite you to join our community; doing so will enable you to view additional forums and post with our other members.



VIP Members don't see these ads.Join VIP Now
Results 1 to 9 of 9

Thread: Go get Barden over Hartline!

  1. -1
    Waterlogged

    Status:
    Offline
    WPA:
    Join date:
    Jan 2011
    Posts:
    1,050
    vCash:
    500
    Thanks / No Thanks

    Go get Barden over Hartline!

    First off, I'd like to say that I am an avid supporter of going to get Jennings and also drafting a recevier early on.


    But I really think we should go get Ramses Barden. The guy has such high upside!


    Look at the numbers:

    Height: 6'6

    40 yard dash: 4.48

    Weight: 229 pounds

    But MOST SHOCKING THING ABOUT BARDEN is his HAND SIZE:

    The guy has 10.75 inch hand size!! Wtf!!! lmao

    the average, guys like britt and others is 9.5, Barden even has bigger hands than Hakeem Nicks! lmao


    I really think we should go get Barden, the upside is incredible, with that height speed and hand size.

    He would be way cheaper than Hartline and he has the ability to play.

    Go get Jennings, but for the other side, let it be a split between Barden/Patterson.

  2. -2
    CANDolphan's Avatar
    Seasoned Veteran

    Status:
    Offline
    WPA:
    Join date:
    Aug 2006
    Posts:
    2,773
    vCash:
    500
    Thanks / No Thanks
    His combine 40 was a 4.55. He had 220 yards

    And you want us to ditch our best WR (Currently) for him? Sigh...

  3. -3
    BassFin's Avatar
    Starter

    Status:
    Offline
    WPA:
    Join date:
    Aug 2003
    Posts:
    668
    vCash:
    500
    Loc:
    Orlando
    Thanks / No Thanks
    Barden: Career (4 YRS) 29 REC 394 YDS 13.6 AVG 0 TDS

    Hartline: Career (4 YRS) 183 REC 2,753 YDS 15.0 AVG 6 TDS

    I'll take productivity over upside.

  4. -4
    dolfaneric12's Avatar
    Sucker Free Sunday

    Status:
    Offline
    WPA:
    Join date:
    May 2010
    Posts:
    408
    vCash:
    500
    Thanks / No Thanks
    Hartline had more yards in one game (253 yards against Cardinals) then Barden had the whole year

  5. -5
    Scout Team

    Status:
    Offline
    WPA:
    Join date:
    Mar 2006
    Posts:
    435
    vCash:
    500
    Loc:
    New Jersey
    Thanks / No Thanks
    I never heard of Barden - what team is he currently the 4th string WR on?

  6. -6
    Kdawg954's Avatar
    I Don't Play . .That's Y I Failed P.E.

    Status:
    Online
    WPA:
    Join date:
    Apr 2006
    Posts:
    13,546
    vCash:
    100200
    Loc:
    Fort Liquordale
    Thanks / No Thanks
    Barden has all the measurables . . . but Hartline is a better WR. Why is that?

    Hartline can get seperation and Barden can't. Hartline is a better route runner and has better hands. He's also faster than Barden.

    Barden is a downgrade from Hartline. Is a 4th WR/red zone specialist.

  7. -7
    Valandui's Avatar
    Lord of Finheaven

    Status:
    Offline
    WPA:
    Join date:
    May 2008
    Posts:
    7,526
    vCash:
    1600
    Loc:
    Lakeland, FL
    Thanks / No Thanks

    To view links or images in this forum your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
    Originally Posted by Kdawg954
    To view links or images in this forum your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
    Barden has all the measurables . . . but Hartline is a better WR. Why is that?

    Hartline can get seperation and Barden can't. Hartline is a better route runner and has better hands. He's also faster than Barden.

    Barden is a downgrade from Hartline. Is a 4th WR/red zone specialist.
    This is all true, but in all fairness, Barden was buried on a very talented Giants roster. At any given time, he's been behind Steve Smith, Mario Manningham, Victor Cruz, Hakeem Nicks, etc. All of these guys are better than our entire receiving corps.



    To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.


    Valandui's Weekly Music Video
    Tesseract: Concealing Fate Part Four: Perfection

    To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.


  8. -8
    Kdawg954's Avatar
    I Don't Play . .That's Y I Failed P.E.

    Status:
    Online
    WPA:
    Join date:
    Apr 2006
    Posts:
    13,546
    vCash:
    100200
    Loc:
    Fort Liquordale
    Thanks / No Thanks

    To view links or images in this forum your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
    Originally Posted by Valandui
    To view links or images in this forum your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
    This is all true, but in all fairness, Barden was buried on a very talented Giants roster. At any given time, he's been behind Steve Smith, Mario Manningham, Victor Cruz, Hakeem Nicks, etc. All of these guys are better than our entire receiving corps.
    The fact that Barden was the 4th WR doesn't bother me . . . he was a man amongst boys in college but the #1 concern for him heading to the NFL was would he get seperation from NFL CB's. He still struggles with that and in this offense you need WR's that can get seperation from the DB. To me he'd be my #4 WR coming here with the current team we got, because I'd put him behind Hartline, Bess and Matthews.

  9. -9
    Dr. Phin's Avatar
    Scout Team

    Status:
    Offline
    WPA:
    Join date:
    Aug 2008
    Posts:
    5,273
    vCash:
    500
    Thanks / No Thanks
    Barden = Bust...understand

    To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •