Welcome to FinHeaven Fans Forums! We're glad to have you here. Please feel free to browse the forum. We'd like to invite you to join our community; doing so will enable you to view additional forums and post with our other members.



VIP Members don't see these ads.Join VIP Now
Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 11 to 17 of 17

Thread: Jake Long

  1. -11
    uk_dolfan's Avatar
    FinHeaven VIP

    Status:
    Offline
    WPA:
    Join date:
    Sep 2012
    Posts:
    3,205
    vCash:
    500
    Loc:
    Northern Ireland, UK
    Thanks / No Thanks

    Re: Jake Long

    We get an awful lot of threads on the same topic atm.

    To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

  2. -12
    jason_taylor's Avatar
    Pro Bowler

    Status:
    Offline
    WPA:
    Join date:
    Aug 2004
    Posts:
    3,347
    vCash:
    500
    Thanks / No Thanks

    To view links or images in this forum your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
    Originally Posted by fanfin
    To view links or images in this forum your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

    To view links or images in this forum your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.



    I think if they can't agree to terms they have to franchise him. If you disagree who do u suggest they pick up? A first round pick on a tackle? or try Will Yeatman at RT?
    theres noway under the sun that we Franchise Long @ 15 mil a year NOWAY IN HELL hes not worth 10 mil a year much less 15 mil , im sure we can find another way besides to waste our money on an injured LT when Martin will step it up , we can bring in 3 decent players with that kind of money i just cant even see 8 mil a year but , would go along as long as it wasnt nomore than 8 mil .

    To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.


  3. -13
    Scout Team

    Status:
    Offline
    WPA:
    Join date:
    Dec 2010
    Posts:
    42
    vCash:
    500
    Thanks / No Thanks
    How does it make any sense to pay a NON IMPACT player on a team LACKING explosiveness in key areas the salary of two or even three starters? Once this team is solid across the board and can put up points in todays NFL then we can start having the luxuries of having a top 5 OT/G/C(Which we already have btw). Until then... it is simply not necessary in a quick hitting zone blocking and west coast style offense.

  4. -14
    Waterlogged

    Status:
    Offline
    WPA:
    Join date:
    Apr 2006
    Posts:
    5,402
    vCash:
    500
    Thanks / No Thanks

    To view links or images in this forum your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

  5. -15
    Scout Team

    Status:
    Offline
    WPA:
    Join date:
    Dec 2010
    Posts:
    42
    vCash:
    500
    Thanks / No Thanks
    Sorry that I keep seeing teams starting 5th and 6th round picks on the offensive line and having good line play or going to the playoffs... Pick up a RT in free agency or in the middle rounds and have them compete with Garner. Martin will be fine.

  6. -16
    fanfin's Avatar
    Pro Bowler

    Status:
    Offline
    WPA:
    Join date:
    Dec 2012
    Posts:
    1,809
    vCash:
    500
    Thanks / No Thanks
    all good teams in this league have first or second round tackles
    NE
    SF
    BAL
    DEN

  7. -17
    Wildbill3's Avatar
    FinHeaven is a site by fans for the fans

    Status:
    Offline
    WPA:
    Join date:
    Dec 2001
    Posts:
    21,536
    vCash:
    200
    Loc:
    Kentucky
    Thanks / No Thanks

    To view links or images in this forum your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
    Originally Posted by Godzilla_89
    To view links or images in this forum your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
    Sorry that I keep seeing teams starting 5th and 6th round picks on the offensive line and having good line play or going to the playoffs... Pick up a RT in free agency or in the middle rounds and have them compete with Garner. Martin will be fine.
    Myth. The majority of the playoff teams had some high picks invested in thier tackles. The argument you should make is that you shouldn't draft a tackle before your qb

    To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •