To view links or images in this forum your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. Originally Posted by
TheWalrus
To view links or images in this forum your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
Cook is a much more explosive athlete and forces safeties to cheat more of the middle of the field, which can really help your outside receivers. Fasano doesn't do that at all. Defenses match a linebacker on him and don't have to worry. The downside on Cook is he's a little straight linish. He's not as shifty as a Finley or a Gonzalez, which makes him less of guy you look to on third down. Think Vernon Davis, only taller and not quite as fast.
Cook also isn't Fasano in terms of the run game, either, though he doesn't really have to be because teams usually match him up against safeties or corners (who are easier to block), rather than the linebackers Fasano faces. If a team comes out with a linebacker matched against Cook a smart quarterback should be able to see that and audible to a winning play.
All things being equal give me the more explosive guy. That's the way most teams think, which is why the salary demands of both won't be even. Cook will cost more, and should. He's younger, too.
For all the talk of Finley as malcontent, I really see him as an opportunity to get a steal. He probably won't cost that much more than Cook, if really much at all, but we know the kind of production he can offer. With Cook it's more of a mystery whereas with Fasano you just accept you're not going to get it.
Bookmarks