Welcome to FinHeaven Fans Forums! We're glad to have you here. Please feel free to browse the forum. We'd like to invite you to join our community; doing so will enable you to view additional forums and post with our other members.



VIP Members don't see these ads.Join VIP Now
Page 4 of 6 FirstFirst 123456 LastLast
Results 31 to 40 of 53

Thread: We will NOT Pay Jennings and Hartline AND get a first round receiver

  1. -31
    PhinSoldia's Avatar
    Miami Dolphin Columnist in the Making

    Status:
    Offline
    WPA:
    Join date:
    Jun 2004
    Posts:
    3,371
    vCash:
    500
    Loc:
    O Town
    Thanks / No Thanks

    To view links or images in this forum your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
    Originally Posted by jlfin
    To view links or images in this forum your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
    Why spend 2 draft picks on WR's? The team needs more than WR's. The way to beat the Pats is with defense, not by outscoring them. The Giants beat them by pressuring Brady with 4 pass rushers (without blitzing).
    The Ravens shut them out in the 2nd half in the AFC championship game. Get the picture.
    You need a balanced offense to win. Its great to have good WR's, but you also need to be able to convert on 3rd and short. This isn't arena football.

    ---------- Post added at 06:50 PM ---------- Previous post was at 06:48 PM ----------



    That's his agent's startng point. I bet he signs for 4.5-5.5 M (with someone).

    im comfortable with 4 at most, anything more is an absolute waste

    ---------- Post added at 06:55 PM ---------- Previous post was at 06:54 PM ----------

    the beauty of the Rookie cap is to bring in a hartline tpe player without playing hartline type money
    Follow me on Twitter.. MainEvent_Z4L

  2. -32
    PhinSoldia's Avatar
    Miami Dolphin Columnist in the Making

    Status:
    Offline
    WPA:
    Join date:
    Jun 2004
    Posts:
    3,371
    vCash:
    500
    Loc:
    O Town
    Thanks / No Thanks

    To view links or images in this forum your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
    Originally Posted by JakeMcAwful
    To view links or images in this forum your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
    I'd be psyched for a WR corps that looked like this,

    Jennings (FA)
    Hartline (FA)
    Bess
    Stedman Bailey (2nd Round pick #1)
    Matthews

    Sign Jared Cook in FA, resign Fasano. This is very doable, I would hope
    To view links or images in this forum your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.


    I agree with OP though, I don't think we sign both Jennings & Hartline as well as draft a WR in the 1st. Plenty of value in the second, along with us having other holes to fill and there being more value at DE where we're drafting.
    this is explosive, but what do we do with the offensive line?

  3. -33
    Starter

    Status:
    Offline
    WPA:
    Join date:
    Jul 2010
    Posts:
    394
    vCash:
    500
    Thanks / No Thanks
    We shouldn't pay hartline and jennings and Go #1 on a WR. IMO If they sign Jennings they will go DL or CB in rd 1 as they should and nab either Robert Woods, DeAndre Hopkins,Tavin Austin or Stedman Bailey in rd 2.


    Jennings
    Hartline
    Bess
    Hopkins
    Matthews
    Binns/Moore

    Add a TE like Keller, have Bess in a more comfortable role then in 2012 and a more seasoned Matthews and thats a huge upgrade from 2012.

  4. -34
    finfan54's Avatar
    FinHeaven VIP

    Status:
    Offline
    WPA:
    Join date:
    Aug 2002
    Posts:
    21,179
    vCash:
    500
    Loc:
    CRAPCHESTER
    Thanks / No Thanks
    Jennings
    Markus Wheaton
    Stedman Bailey
    Matthews
    Binn

    Bamm!

    No need for Wallace when you can have Wheaton. Go watch his highlights. He's ready. 2nd round, 3rd round, be done with it.

  5. -35
    iwastherein72's Avatar
    Starter

    Status:
    Offline
    WPA:
    Join date:
    Jan 2012
    Posts:
    383
    vCash:
    500
    Thanks / No Thanks

    To view links or images in this forum your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
    Originally Posted by normaldude
    To view links or images in this forum your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
    I would be fine with signing Jennings & Hartline, and using our 1st rd pick on a DB.
    This would GUARANTEE being 7-9 or 6-10 again.

    If you (or anyone else) thinks signing an over-30 WCO specialist WR who is really a glorified 2 with some speed (which is declining) means we have The Answer at WR... I got real estate out in East Miami to sell you.
    Ryan Tannehill. Ah, what a relief. Life is good.

  6. -36
    jlfin's Avatar
    old pro

    Status:
    Offline
    WPA:
    Join date:
    Mar 2005
    Posts:
    7,155
    vCash:
    500
    Loc:
    windermere
    Thanks / No Thanks

    To view links or images in this forum your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
    Originally Posted by iwastherein72
    To view links or images in this forum your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
    This would GUARANTEE being 7-9 or 6-10 again.

    If you (or anyone else) thinks signing an over-30 WCO specialist WR who is really a glorified 2 with some speed (which is declining) means we have The Answer at WR... I got real estate out in East Miami to sell you.
    You make such a definitive statement as if to suggest that no WR ever drafted beyond rd 1 has ever become an upper echelon receiver. How foolish and uninformed. You are aware that defense is an integral part in winning football games.
    The cynic knows the price of everything, but the value of nothing
    -Oscar Wilde

  7. -37
    Waterlogged

    Status:
    Offline
    WPA:
    Join date:
    Jan 2011
    Posts:
    1,050
    vCash:
    500
    Thanks / No Thanks
    I honestly don't believe the second round receivers will ever amount to number 1 receivers in the nfl. That's what we should be going after.

  8. -38
    NorFlaFin's Avatar
    PowerHungryMo'fo

    Status:
    Offline
    WPA:
    Join date:
    Sep 2004
    Posts:
    3,534
    vCash:
    500
    Thanks / No Thanks
    If we signed Wallace and Bowe, why would I even want Hartline? Nice kid but not really in the same league as Wallace and Bowe.

  9. -39
    Waterlogged

    Status:
    Offline
    WPA:
    Join date:
    Jan 2011
    Posts:
    1,050
    vCash:
    500
    Thanks / No Thanks

    To view links or images in this forum your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
    Originally Posted by NorFlaFin
    To view links or images in this forum your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
    If we signed Wallace and Bowe, why would I even want Hartline? Nice kid but not really in the same league as Wallace and Bowe.
    What? We're not going to spend 22 million on 2 receivers. Stop dreaming.

  10. -40
    Zounds's Avatar
    Starter

    Status:
    Offline
    WPA:
    Join date:
    Jan 2005
    Posts:
    4,461
    vCash:
    500
    Loc:
    Orlando
    Thanks / No Thanks
    I dont see why we can't have Jennings, Hartline, Bess, and a high round draft pick. Jennings is not a long term solution, and he works well on an offense the spreads the ball around. Its financial feasible, and it makes sense talent wise.

    The only reason we wouldnt follow that scenerio is if we like some of the WRs currently on our roster to be long term starters, which I dont see happening.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •