Welcome to FinHeaven Fans Forums! We're glad to have you here. Please feel free to browse the forum. We'd like to invite you to join our community; doing so will enable you to view additional forums and post with our other members.



VIP Members don't see these ads.Join VIP Now
Page 4 of 5 FirstFirst 12345 LastLast
Results 31 to 40 of 42

Thread: McNabb: Watch out for Ryan Tannehill

  1. -31
    PhinzN703's Avatar
    I like your style Dude

    Status:
    Offline
    WPA:
    Join date:
    Oct 2004
    Posts:
    22,315
    vCash:
    550
    Loc:
    Springfield, VA
    Thanks / No Thanks
    3-4 years away? Great

    To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

  2. -32
    antillj94's Avatar
    Starter

    Status:
    Offline
    WPA:
    Join date:
    Jan 2013
    Posts:
    138
    vCash:
    500
    Loc:
    Orlando, FL
    Thanks / No Thanks

    To view links or images in this forum your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
    Originally Posted by Vertical Limit
    To view links or images in this forum your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
    You think the Colts are waiting 3-4 years? No, they're going to be perennial playoff contenders from here on out. They already have all the pieces on offense except for a running back. Now they just need to add onto that defense, get that running back I just mentioned, and I can see them playing against Denver, Baltimore or New England in an AFC Title game next year.
    Nothing says they are perennial contenders from here on out, they actually don't have a lot of great pieces. The defense pretty much needs to be rebuilt from scratch with Mathis and Freeney's contracts expiring this offseason, but they do have a solid corner that may or may not have been worth a second rounder (time will tell).

    Their offense is mediocre; they lack a run game and their receivers are inconsistent. Andrew Luck and T.Y. Hilton look to be a great duo for years to come already, but their weak offensive line will hold them back until it's fixed. Their only solid pieces in the line are Castonzo and Satele (who's a Fin's reject). If Fleener and Allen live up to their potential, they should have a good if not great TE duo to help Luck develop, but so far Fleener doesn't look worth the pick. (again time will tell (*Michael Egnew should be held in this regard too))

    If you notice, the games they won were all reasonably close, with margins of: 3, 3, 4, 6, 17 (woo!), 7, 2, 4, 7, and 12. Seven of their wins were by game-winning drives thanks to the heroics of Andrew Luck, who I might mention, is considered the top QB prospect since Peyton Manning. Not every team is lucky enough to replace a Hall of Fame QB with a #1 overall pick. When it comes to their losses, they were by margins of: 20, 5, 26, 35, and 12. Almost every time they lost, they were getting their as*** handed to them on a silver platter.

    Honestly, I could see the Colts taking strides backwards next year, not necessarily Luck or the young receivers, but I think the O-line and D-line are going to cause too much trouble for them to make the playoffs again.

  3. -33
    antillj94's Avatar
    Starter

    Status:
    Offline
    WPA:
    Join date:
    Jan 2013
    Posts:
    138
    vCash:
    500
    Loc:
    Orlando, FL
    Thanks / No Thanks

    To view links or images in this forum your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
    Originally Posted by PhinzN703
    To view links or images in this forum your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
    3-4 years away? Great
    Better than 10!

  4. -34
    Wildbill3's Avatar
    FinHeaven is a site by fans for the fans

    Status:
    Online
    WPA:
    Join date:
    Dec 2001
    Posts:
    21,562
    vCash:
    200
    Loc:
    Kentucky
    Thanks / No Thanks

    To view links or images in this forum your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
    Originally Posted by NY8123
    To view links or images in this forum your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
    Yup there isn't anymore 2 or 3 year plans in my eyes. Jeff gives this staff the talent it needs to win and be a playoff contender this season or it is time to clean house and get someone who can. I know I want stability in the ranks but you also have to win at some point and that point is now.
    Seriously this is it. 3-4 years? that's crazy brains. This year is our window. we got a young team, but we have some guys on the wrong side of 30 that we're counting on to be major players on our team. If we have people preaching well wait til these young guys mature, well we'll have more holes to fill, every year in fact has holes to fill, injuries happen etc etc. this is our Now.

    To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

  5. -35
    NY8123's Avatar
    Sophisticated Redneck

    Status:
    Offline
    WPA:
    Join date:
    Jan 2008
    Posts:
    9,098
    vCash:
    144645
    Loc:
    out in the Ding Weeds
    Thanks / No Thanks

    To view links or images in this forum your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
    Originally Posted by Wildbill3
    To view links or images in this forum your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
    Seriously this is it. 3-4 years? that's crazy brains. This year is our window. we got a young team, but we have some guys on the wrong side of 30 that we're counting on to be major players on our team. If we have people preaching well wait til these young guys mature, well we'll have more holes to fill, every year in fact has holes to fill, injuries happen etc etc. this is our Now.
    My staff prediction will reelect this, it will either say Miami is ready to contend (based on a good off season) or it will say the front office failed and it is time for change. There is no reason with all that Ireland has available that he cannot make a winning team this off season. I know it is going to have holes but honestly what team doesn't?

    You are banking on your QB improving not regressing so get him some help to improve, sign a TE or WR and maybe a tackle if Long walks and then move on to the draft. Get a RB, WR and CB and fill in the rest where needed hell any of those combinations of positions and FA/draft will work. It will tell me a lot about what Jeff's plan is in the coming month when we see what free agents are re-signed and which one are allowed to walk if they want.
    "Half the lies they tell about me aren't true." ~ Yogi Berra

  6. -36
    Birdmond's Avatar
    Starter

    Status:
    Offline
    WPA:
    Join date:
    Nov 2012
    Posts:
    403
    vCash:
    500
    Thanks / No Thanks

    McNabb: Watch out for Ryan Tannehill

    It's funny how when McNabb speaks we normally roll our eyes but when he supports our point of view he becomes the voice of reason.

    Although now that I think about it McNabb did say Shanahan would ruin RGIII's career.

  7. -37
    CalDolFan10x14's Avatar
    BELIEVE

    Status:
    Offline
    WPA:
    Join date:
    Sep 2004
    Posts:
    11,072
    vCash:
    200
    Loc:
    The Golden State
    Thanks / No Thanks
    Add a Greg Jennings (or Mike Wallace)to the mix, maybe a first/second round WR, and Tannehill will thrive. We've seen what he's capable even with less than spectacular tools but he does need more. It's time we spice up the offense if we're going to go anywhere as a team. And to be honest, we don't need to wait 3-5 years for that to happen. With all the money and picks available, there's no reason why we can't field a playoff caliber team in 2013. Get it done already.

    To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
    Be afraid, Brady. Be very afraid!

    I just try to be myself, whatever that is. I don't think about how I'll be remembered. I just want to be consistent over a long period of time. That's what the great players do.
    -Dan Marino

  8. -38
    Seasoned Veteran

    Status:
    Offline
    WPA:
    Join date:
    May 2010
    Posts:
    689
    vCash:
    500
    Thanks / No Thanks

    To view links or images in this forum your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

  9. -39
    BigJP's Avatar
    Rookie

    Status:
    Offline
    WPA:
    Join date:
    Jan 2008
    Posts:
    706
    vCash:
    500
    Thanks / No Thanks
    I could wait a 3-4 yrs. I just hope the front office will give them the chance.

    To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

  10. -40
    X-FACTOR's Avatar
    Scout Team

    Status:
    Offline
    WPA:
    Join date:
    Jun 2005
    Posts:
    262
    vCash:
    500
    Loc:
    WASHINGTON, D.c.
    Thanks / No Thanks

    To view links or images in this forum your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
    Originally Posted by CalDolFan10x14
    To view links or images in this forum your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
    Add a Greg Jennings (or Mike Wallace)to the mix, maybe a first/second round WR, and Tannehill will thrive. We've seen what he's capable even with less than spectacular tools but he does need more. It's time we spice up the offense if we're going to go anywhere as a team. And to be honest, we don't need to wait 3-5 years for that to happen. With all the money and picks available, there's no reason why we can't field a playoff caliber team in 2013. Get it done already.
    Agreed....Tannehill certainly looks the part. If we can add two weapons to WR core he could take the next step. I recall two or three slants that were dropped that very well could have been T.D.'s and at the least very long gains.

    To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •