Welcome to FinHeaven Fans Forums! We're glad to have you here. Please feel free to browse the forum. We'd like to invite you to join our community; doing so will enable you to view additional forums and post with our other members.



VIP Members don't see these ads.Join VIP Now
Results 1 to 10 of 48

Thread: Rise of Nazi Germany/Modern-Day America

Threaded View

  1. -14
    Breed's Avatar
    Pro Bowler

    Status:
    Offline
    WPA:
    Join date:
    Jan 2004
    Posts:
    1,958
    vCash:
    1000000
    Loc:
    United States
    Thanks / No Thanks

    To view links or images in this forum your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
    Originally Posted by Spesh
    To view links or images in this forum your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
    For those looking for the cliffnotes version: Obama is the next Hitler because he prosecutes those who technically break the law and he blames Republicans for filibusters.
    How many of the articles that I posted did you read? How many youtube clips did you watch?
    Do you believe that laws like the Patriot Act, NDAA, The National Defense Resources Preparedness Executive Order, and H.R. 347 are dangerous? Do you believe that those laws could eventually lead to tyranny. Those are lloaded questions, I know, but there is only one logical answer.

    Assertions aside, from the links I have posted, what do you believe to be inaccurate?


    To view links or images in this forum your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
    Originally Posted by Spesh
    To view links or images in this forum your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
    Oh, and Stalin, the Gestapo, and Martial Law are brought up while also attempting to indirectly link Factcheck.org to Obama.
    Is this a valid statement?:

    To view links or images in this forum your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
    Originally Posted by Breed
    To view links or images in this forum your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
    Even assuming that there is no connection between Factcheck.org and Obama, their answer to the "Obama's private army" question doesn't touch on what the law can do, only on what the law was intended to do. The intention of any given law only holds so much weight. The important thing is how the law can be interpreted by whoever is in power. I'd like to see multiple law experts go on record saying that this particular section of the Healthcare Bill can't be used to create a militia.
    Do you believe the intent behind any given law is more important than the way in which it can be interpreted? How much weight do you put into how a law can be interpreted versus its original intent?
    Last edited by Breed; 02-07-2013 at 10:23 AM.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •