Welcome to FinHeaven Fans Forums! We're glad to have you here. Please feel free to browse the forum. We'd like to invite you to join our community; doing so will enable you to view additional forums and post with our other members.



VIP Members don't see these ads.Join VIP Now
Page 1 of 7 123456 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 69

Thread: Jared Odrick to hit trade block?

  1. -1
    Starter

    Status:
    Offline
    WPA:
    Join date:
    Dec 2011
    Posts:
    157
    vCash:
    500
    Thanks / No Thanks

    Jared Odrick to hit trade block?

    Armando Salguero of the Miami Herald suggests that the dolphins might place RE Jared Odrick on the trade block....reasoning Odrick was drafted to play "five technique" in a 3-4 defense. The Dolphins are now a 4-3 and Odrick lacks explosive ability requisite for 4-3 defensive ends. "He's not a fit for the scheme" Salguero writes, Odrick has cheap base salaries through 2014, is only 25 yrs old, and possesses an ideal skill set for the 3-4. He could likely bring back a second-day draft pick via trade. If we resign DE, Randy Stark ....i wouldnt mind trading Odrick for second rounder.

  2. -2
    Perfect23's Avatar
    I wish people understood this

    Status:
    Offline
    WPA:
    Join date:
    Dec 2005
    Posts:
    4,181
    vCash:
    500
    Loc:
    Earth
    Thanks / No Thanks
    thats a nice way by armando to cover up for jeff ireland 1 of many bad draft picks

  3. -3
    Hayden Fox's Avatar
    Who Can Make a Play?

    Status:
    Offline
    WPA:
    Join date:
    Jan 2009
    Posts:
    12,478
    vCash:
    500
    Thanks / No Thanks
    IF Starks came back than I do not have an issue with it. However, I would let Starks walk and move Odrick inside. I bet he could add some pass rush on early downs.

  4. -4
    finfan54's Avatar
    FinHeaven VIP

    Status:
    Offline
    WPA:
    Join date:
    Aug 2002
    Posts:
    21,168
    vCash:
    500
    Loc:
    CRAPCHESTER
    Thanks / No Thanks
    sorry, i just cant live w/out the pee wee dance

    To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

    AIR JORDAN

  5. -5
    Scout Team

    Status:
    Offline
    WPA:
    Join date:
    Jan 2008
    Posts:
    484
    vCash:
    500
    Thanks / No Thanks
    He's a #1 draftpick. I think we should keep him. We've got to stop tradeing #1 picks for second-rounders.

  6. -6
    Starter

    Status:
    Offline
    WPA:
    Join date:
    Aug 2011
    Posts:
    222
    vCash:
    500
    Loc:
    Hewitt, NJ
    Thanks / No Thanks
    Is it realistic to think someone woild give us a 2nd round pick for him? I see potential, but I don't think he has proven to be that good.

  7. -7
    Nublar7's Avatar
    FinHeaven Administrator

    Status:
    Offline
    WPA:
    Join date:
    Aug 2003
    Posts:
    31,434
    vCash:
    2469400
    Loc:
    Pennsylvania
    Thanks / No Thanks
    Odrick isn't being traded and he shouldn't be. He is a good, not great player so far and I think he will be kicked inside to DT if Starks walks in free agency. Odrick will be a better fit there.

    To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.


    To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

  8. -8
    Valbon8's Avatar
    Phins Up!

    Status:
    Offline
    WPA:
    Join date:
    Mar 2005
    Posts:
    423
    vCash:
    500
    Loc:
    Cudahy, WI
    Thanks / No Thanks

    Re: Jared Odrick to hit trade block?

    That's Armando's opinion, not the truth. Give me some of what he's smoking.

    Follow me on Twitter @vlatifi

    To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

  9. -9
    Valandui's Avatar
    Lord of Finheaven

    Status:
    Offline
    WPA:
    Join date:
    May 2008
    Posts:
    7,498
    vCash:
    1600
    Loc:
    Lakeland, FL
    Thanks / No Thanks

    To view links or images in this forum your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
    Originally Posted by Hayden Fox
    To view links or images in this forum your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
    IF Starks came back than I do not have an issue with it. However, I would let Starks walk and move Odrick inside. I bet he could add some pass rush on early downs.
    Unless he's looking for an excuse to take a DT in the first round to fill a hole we don't cureently have.



    To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.


    Valandui's Weekly Music Video
    Tesseract: Concealing Fate Part Four: Perfection

    To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.


  10. -10
    Digital's Avatar
    Starter

    Status:
    Offline
    WPA:
    Join date:
    Feb 2008
    Posts:
    1,771
    vCash:
    500
    Thanks / No Thanks
    Well if it's really being considered and we can get an upper 2nd round pick for him, I'm fine with it. He was a 1st rounder, sure, but we also got a few years out of him, and he hasn't blossomed into a dominant player, so an upper 2nd would be a good move IMHO. In the short term that would mean resigning Starks, which I'm in favor of doing anyway. It would also free us up to take one of the pass rushing DE's in round 1 or take a chance on someone like Tank Carradine if he falls. Odrick is a good guy and a decent player, but he is by no means a potential star or an untradeable player.

    If we're being offered a late 3rd, then I'd rather not trade him. I'm all for trading Odrick for a legitimate pass rusher, trading a 34 guy for a 43 guy, trading solid play today for exceptional play tomorrow, etc. But, the pick would have to be high enough to do those things. If we have a shot at one of the top pass rushers, we will likely take it, making Odrick the odd man out (yes, pun intended) or pushing him inside to take Starks' place. His trade value is likely higher before the draft, and it gives us better flexibility because many of the good fit players for us are late 1st/early 2nd round picks ... so stocking up on picks there seems like a very beneficial thing to do.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •