Welcome to FinHeaven Fans Forums! We're glad to have you here. Please feel free to browse the forum. We'd like to invite you to join our community; doing so will enable you to view additional forums and post with our other members.



VIP Members don't see these ads.Join VIP Now
Page 1 of 6 12345 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 57

Thread: I simply do not understand...

Hybrid View

  1. -1
    fanfin's Avatar
    Pro Bowler

    Status:
    Offline
    WPA:
    Join date:
    Dec 2012
    Posts:
    1,809
    vCash:
    500
    Thanks / No Thanks

    SIGH I simply do not understand...

    why everyone wants Jake Long to leave. His play has suffered due to injuries and schematic changes but he is still a top 10 LT in the league and those guys don't grow on trees. Some of you talk worse about him than Marc Colombo! He is asking for 10M$ per season which isn't exactly breaking the bank. All we are doing by letting him go is creating ANOTHER need. If we cut Carpenter and either Richard Marshall or Dmitri Patterson we will have around 55 million in salary cap space! Why not spend 10 of that on Jake and we still have 45 million left for Greg Jennings, a TE, and a CB like Derek Cox

  2. -2
    Andyman's Avatar
    Canadian Fin Fan

    Status:
    Offline
    WPA:
    Join date:
    Mar 2004
    Posts:
    528
    vCash:
    500
    Loc:
    Ottawa, Canada
    Thanks / No Thanks
    I think you answered your own question. The difficulty is assessing whether his injuries will heal enough to have him return to 2010 form or if his body is just breaking down and will continue to do so.
    Andyman

  3. -3
    Zounds's Avatar
    Starter

    Status:
    Offline
    WPA:
    Join date:
    Jan 2005
    Posts:
    4,463
    vCash:
    500
    Loc:
    Orlando
    Thanks / No Thanks
    I agree with keeping him, but it should be under $10 mill per season, and it should offer us a way out if his injuries continue.

  4. -4
    Dolphins91's Avatar
    Starter

    Status:
    Offline
    WPA:
    Join date:
    Jul 2011
    Posts:
    153
    vCash:
    500
    Thanks / No Thanks
    Jake Long is a good LT. Problem is, he wants Elite Left Tackle money and that doesn't fit his description anymore. So yes, $10 million for any good player that's not a QB is breaking the bank. And if we cut Patterson or Marshall, we have to eat part of their salaries and still pay them their guarantee's, so you can't just get their salary and add it to available salary cap money. It's dead money that cannot be used.

  5. -5
    Waterlogged

    Status:
    Offline
    WPA:
    Join date:
    Apr 2006
    Posts:
    5,402
    vCash:
    500
    Thanks / No Thanks

    To view links or images in this forum your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
    Originally Posted by Dolphins91
    To view links or images in this forum your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
    Jake Long is a good LT. Problem is, he wants Elite Left Tackle money and that doesn't fit his description anymore. So yes, $10 million for any good player that's not a QB is breaking the bank. And if we cut Patterson or Marshall, we have to eat part of their salaries and still pay them their guarantee's, so you can't just get their salary and add it to available salary cap money. It's dead money that cannot be used.
    I'm sorry but he's a perennial pro bowl LT and $10mil is "more" than reasonable for a perennial pro bowl LT. He's asking nowhere near Joe Thomas elite money, that's just made up propaganda. And that's his starting point at that, so he's showing willingness to negotiate. This he wants too much money is a bunch of bunk. All Ireland has to do is near match that $10mil, say $9.5mil and you keep him from hitting FA (where his price will go UP).

  6. -6
    Dolphins91's Avatar
    Starter

    Status:
    Offline
    WPA:
    Join date:
    Jul 2011
    Posts:
    153
    vCash:
    500
    Thanks / No Thanks

    To view links or images in this forum your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
    Originally Posted by MrEd
    To view links or images in this forum your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
    I'm sorry but he's a perennial pro bowl LT and $10mil is "more" than reasonable for a perennial pro bowl LT. He's asking nowhere near Joe Thomas elite money, that's just made up propaganda. And that's his starting point at that, so he's showing willingness to negotiate. This he wants too much money is a bunch of bunk. All Ireland has to do is near match that $10mil, say $9.5mil and you keep him from hitting FA (where his price will go UP).
    Joe Thomas makes $10 million a season.

    "The Miami Herald reports free agent LT Jake Long is believed to be seeking at least $10 million annually, and that the Dolphins are "pessimistic" about their chances of re-signing him."

  7. -7
    Waterlogged

    Status:
    Offline
    WPA:
    Join date:
    Apr 2006
    Posts:
    5,402
    vCash:
    500
    Thanks / No Thanks

    To view links or images in this forum your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
    Originally Posted by Dolphins91
    To view links or images in this forum your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
    Joe Thomas makes $10 million a season.

    "The Miami Herald reports free agent LT Jake Long is believed to be seeking at least $10 million annually, and that the Dolphins are "pessimistic" about their chances of re-signing him."
    No, he doesn't. Joe Thomas makes $12mil a year. Not to mention $44mil guaranteed. Please stop it. Smdh.


    To view links or images in this forum your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

  8. -8
    antillj94's Avatar
    Starter

    Status:
    Offline
    WPA:
    Join date:
    Jan 2013
    Posts:
    138
    vCash:
    500
    Loc:
    Orlando, FL
    Thanks / No Thanks

    To view links or images in this forum your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
    Originally Posted by MrEd
    To view links or images in this forum your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
    I'm sorry but he's a perennial pro bowl LT and $10mil is "more" than reasonable for a perennial pro bowl LT. He's asking nowhere near Joe Thomas elite money, that's just made up propaganda. And that's his starting point at that, so he's showing willingness to negotiate. This he wants too much money is a bunch of bunk. All Ireland has to do is near match that $10mil, say $9.5mil and you keep him from hitting FA (where his price will go UP).
    He's a perennial Pro Bowler because he's a fan favorite, not because he's been playing like a Pro Bowler. His play has reduced considerably over the last two years, and he doesn't fit our scheme. The OP stated that despite the scheme change, we should keep him. WHY? Those $10 million could go to Mike Wallace, Randy Starks, Sean Smith (hopefully not), or Brian Hartline. If he doesn't fit our scheme AND he's playing like crap, why keep him? As far as I see it, he got lucky with that fat contract we handed him as a rookie and he's squeezed every penny out of Ross' pocket while playing like an extremely average tackle.

    Don't get me wrong, he WAS elite for a few years, but he's a shell of his former self.

  9. -9
    fanfin's Avatar
    Pro Bowler

    Status:
    Offline
    WPA:
    Join date:
    Dec 2012
    Posts:
    1,809
    vCash:
    500
    Thanks / No Thanks

    To view links or images in this forum your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
    Originally Posted by antillj94
    To view links or images in this forum your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
    He's a perennial Pro Bowler because he's a fan favorite, not because he's been playing like a Pro Bowler. His play has reduced considerably over the last two years, and he doesn't fit our scheme. The OP stated that despite the scheme change, we should keep him. WHY? Those $10 million could go to Mike Wallace, Randy Starks, Sean Smith (hopefully not), or Brian Hartline. If he doesn't fit our scheme AND he's playing like crap, why keep him? As far as I see it, he got lucky with that fat contract we handed him as a rookie and he's squeezed every penny out of Ross' pocket while playing like an extremely average tackle.

    Don't get me wrong, he WAS elite for a few years, but he's a shell of his former self.
    why would u pay Brian Hartline the dude is literally allergic to the end zone.

  10. -10
    Waterlogged

    Status:
    Offline
    WPA:
    Join date:
    Apr 2006
    Posts:
    5,402
    vCash:
    500
    Thanks / No Thanks

    To view links or images in this forum your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
    Originally Posted by antillj94
    To view links or images in this forum your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
    He's a perennial Pro Bowler because he's a fan favorite, not because he's been playing like a Pro Bowler. His play has reduced considerably over the last two years, and he doesn't fit our scheme. The OP stated that despite the scheme change, we should keep him. WHY? Those $10 million could go to Mike Wallace, Randy Starks, Sean Smith (hopefully not), or Brian Hartline. If he doesn't fit our scheme AND he's playing like crap, why keep him? As far as I see it, he got lucky with that fat contract we handed him as a rookie and he's squeezed every penny out of Ross' pocket while playing like an extremely average tackle.

    Don't get me wrong, he WAS elite for a few years, but he's a shell of his former self.
    He's a perennial pro bowler because on his "worst" year he was still a "very good" LT and in his best years up there with Joe Thomas that's why the fans put him there.
    To view links or images in this forum your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •