Sounds like Hartline is staying. That said, I want Wallace more now. Wanted Jennings and Amendola, but with Hartline back, we need more of a deep threat guy. Keep Bess and Matthews. Draft WR 2 deep (Patterson and Swope?).
Sounds like Hartline is staying. That said, I want Wallace more now. Wanted Jennings and Amendola, but with Hartline back, we need more of a deep threat guy. Keep Bess and Matthews. Draft WR 2 deep (Patterson and Swope?).
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
I'm confident that whoever our FO brings in, will be a good move. Anything is an improvement at this point.
cant see 12 mil a year for a player that has sit amost 3/4 of the year , if Jennings would take 8 mil a year i would think about it ,but nomore than 8 mil.
To view links or images in this forum your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
Originally Posted by Yessir
To view links or images in this forum your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
Wait... What!?! What exactly are you trying to say here. Are you predicting that Hartline will suck this year? That we should let him walk and sign his replacement off the street? Please clarify as your statement makes you sound bat-**** crazy (IMO of course).
To view links or images in this forum your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
Originally Posted by PhinSoldia
To view links or images in this forum your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
I know he's not exactly a TD machine but I think the consensus here is that he'd make a damn fine complimentary receiver opposite a true #1
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
sm0kin the competition
[QUOTE=
I know he's not exactly a TD machine but I think the consensus here is that he'd make a damn fine complimentary receiver opposite a true #1[/QUOTE]
Ya I for one, can't wait to see Hartline opposite a true number one
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
Danny
To view links or images in this forum your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
Originally Posted by uk_dolfan
To view links or images in this forum your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
To view links or images in this forum your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
This typo alone is worth a thousand "thanks".
To view links or images in this forum your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.


good point
To view links or images in this forum your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
Originally Posted by sm0kinfins
To view links or images in this forum your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
To view links or images in this forum your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
To view links or images in this forum your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
He is........ and so your point would be what?
To view links or images in this forum your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
Originally Posted by uk_dolfan
To view links or images in this forum your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
I think a decent WR group would be..
1. Greg Jennings.
2. Brian Hartline.
3 (slot): Davone Bess.
4 (flex): Ryan Swope. 6', 205 lbs, 4.3-4.4 speed, good hands, good routes, good in traffic, good chemistry & track record with Ryan Tannehill & Mike Sherman. Rookie year, he has the potential to be able to rotate in to any of the above WR spots when needed. Over time, he has the tools to become equivalent to a young Greg Jennings.
5 (inactive): Rishard Matthews. Usually one WR is inactive. Rishard Matthews is cheap, has looked decent so far, can step in when players get injured. He is a good #5 WR.
To view links or images in this forum your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
Originally Posted by normaldude
To view links or images in this forum your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
If the team wants to run efficiently in a WO type offense we need 5 on the active 53 UNLESS we go out and get a TE or draft ertz/eifert
Follow me on Twitter.. MainEvent_Z4L
Bookmarks