Which would benefit the Fins more, assuming we cannot sign Wallace; the Pats signing Welker or Wallace?
Which would benefit the Fins more, assuming we cannot sign Wallace; the Pats signing Welker or Wallace?
Pats signing Welker.
The Pats signing Wallace would be 2007 all over again - might even be better.
Do you think signing Welker would preclude them from going after Wallace?
That depends on if they also intend to re-sign Sebastian Vollmer and Agib Talib. The Patriots, like a lot of team don't like to overpay for players and they would have to overpay for Wallace.
To view links or images in this forum your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
Originally Posted by BahamaFinFan78
To view links or images in this forum your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
Welker is the only thing between the Pats and Wallace, and therefore the Pats and 2007. The Pats want Wallace for Brady's last stand.
It doesn't matter. They have one of the best coaches ever and one of the best QBs ever. They will make it work with either guy. They can even make it work without either.
Welker
As long as they don't sign Juan Huron we'll be ok.
... That dude has all the tools.
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
2013 Goals:
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
1) Win the next game.
2) See goal #1
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
"The problem with internet quotes is verifying their authenticity."
-Abraham Lincoln
The DRIVE FOR FIVE continues!
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
Bookmarks