Welcome to FinHeaven Fans Forums! We're glad to have you here. Please feel free to browse the forum. We'd like to invite you to join our community; doing so will enable you to view additional forums and post with our other members.



VIP Members don't see these ads. Join VIP Now
Page 7 of 11 FirstFirst ... 234567891011 LastLast
Results 61 to 70 of 102

Thread: Sick of Liberals..

  1. -61
    Sniper's Avatar
    Your friendly neighborhood Bills fan

    Status:
    Offline
    WPA:
    Join date:
    May 2002
    Posts:
    588
    vCash:
    1000
    Loc:
    Upstate NY
    Thanks / No Thanks
    Originally posted by WharfRat
    Sniper!!!

    Geez - oh - man ... you can't be serious!!!

    Why do we have the suits? for protection against IRAQ'S chemical weapons...
    You're now saying that the US is known to use chem weapon??? and that any country need to "defend" themselves against a possible US chem attack?

    Please dude... there is NO reason for them to be concerned about chemical warfare, unless they intend to wage it themselves...they know it, I know it, and deep down, I think you know it too.....
    So they are going to launch these artillary shells into their own troops? I'm not buying that.
    Quote Quote  

  2. -62
    PhinPhan1227's Avatar
    Why is there a watermelon there?

    Status:
    Offline
    WPA:
    Join date:
    Sep 2002
    Posts:
    15,647
    vCash:
    1000
    Loc:
    No matter where I go, there I am.
    Thanks / No Thanks
    Originally posted by Sniper
    Way out? There are many countries that have these suits. Does this make them automatically guilty of having chemical weapons? Or does it mean that their governments are protecting their troops from a possible chemical attack?

    Of the two countries, which are known Chemical weapons users, Israel or Iraq? As such, who has the burden of proof that they WON'T use chemical weapons, Israel or Iraq? Lastly, of the two countries, who has launched attacks against the others civilian populations, Israel or Iraq? I think calling that theory a stretch is perfectly justified.
    Quote Quote  

  3. -63
    Waterlogged

    Status:
    Offline
    WPA:
    Join date:
    May 2002
    Posts:
    17,876
    vCash:
    1000
    Loc:
    In a land far, far away
    Thanks / No Thanks
    Originally posted by Sniper
    Way out? There are many countries that have these suits. Does this make them automatically guilty of having chemical weapons? Or does it mean that their governments are protecting their troops from a possible chemical attack?
    Sniper ... yes almost every military is issued chem suits... however, if a US unit was deployed in an area that posed no threat of chemical attack, they wouldn't bother toting them around....
    I was deployed in operations to countries that did not pose a chemical threat, suits were left behind....
    Quote Quote  

  4. -64
    PhinPhan1227's Avatar
    Why is there a watermelon there?

    Status:
    Offline
    WPA:
    Join date:
    Sep 2002
    Posts:
    15,647
    vCash:
    1000
    Loc:
    No matter where I go, there I am.
    Thanks / No Thanks
    Originally posted by Sniper
    So they are going to launch these artillary shells into their own troops? I'm not buying that.

    Dude, buy a clue! You issue your own troops chem suits and atropine because the weapons are completely unpredictable. The weapons are deployed in aerosol form, so if the wind blows the wrong way, you get your own weapon back in your face. It's SOP to have the troops that deploy these weapons issued chem suits and atropine for that VERY reason.
    Quote Quote  

  5. -65
    Waterlogged

    Status:
    Offline
    WPA:
    Join date:
    May 2002
    Posts:
    17,876
    vCash:
    1000
    Loc:
    In a land far, far away
    Thanks / No Thanks
    Originally posted by Sniper
    So they are going to launch these artillary shells into their own troops? I'm not buying that.
    Sniper... get with it... you drop chem weapons...THEY SPREAD.... it's not a precision thing... you think mustard gas stays where you aim it? Of course not... the wind blows it, it drifts, it spreads... and then... do you want to take the position just vacated by the now burned up enemy? If so... you'd better have a suit...
    Quote Quote  

  6. -66
    Sniper's Avatar
    Your friendly neighborhood Bills fan

    Status:
    Offline
    WPA:
    Join date:
    May 2002
    Posts:
    588
    vCash:
    1000
    Loc:
    Upstate NY
    Thanks / No Thanks
    Originally posted by PhinPhan1227
    Of the two countries, which are known Chemical weapons users, Israel or Iraq?
    I agree that Iraq has... But, who supplied them with these weapons at that time and who trained them?

    Originally posted by PhinPhan1227
    As such, who has the burden of proof that they WON'T use chemical weapons, Israel or Iraq?
    Hence, the need for inspections.

    Originally posted by PhinPhan1227
    Lastly, of the two countries, who has launched attacks against the others civilian populations, Israel or Iraq? I think calling that theory a stretch is perfectly justified.
    Ask the Palistineans if they are civilians... also ask them who routinely launches attacks against them?
    Quote Quote  

  7. -67
    Penthos's Avatar
    Am I on speaker phone?

    Status:
    Online
    WPA:
    Join date:
    Sep 2002
    Posts:
    4,122
    vCash:
    2428
    Loc:
    Charlotte
    Thanks / No Thanks
    Isreal has been violating UN resolutions for years... I guess we go after them next.
    Quote Quote  

  8. -68
    Waterlogged

    Status:
    Offline
    WPA:
    Join date:
    May 2002
    Posts:
    17,876
    vCash:
    1000
    Loc:
    In a land far, far away
    Thanks / No Thanks
    Originally posted by Sniper
    I agree that Iraq has... But, who supplied them with these weapons at that time and who trained them?
    good question... who did?


    Hence, the need for inspections.
    12 more years? Is that enough time?


    Ask the Palistineans if they are civilians... also ask them who routinely launches attacks against them?
    conversly...ask the students in the Mall if they were civilians... before the Palestinian "civilian" marched in there with a bomb strapped to his ass....
    Quote Quote  

  9. -69
    Sniper's Avatar
    Your friendly neighborhood Bills fan

    Status:
    Offline
    WPA:
    Join date:
    May 2002
    Posts:
    588
    vCash:
    1000
    Loc:
    Upstate NY
    Thanks / No Thanks
    Does Israel have chemical weapons?

    Does Israel have missiles capable of reaching Iraq?

    Does Israel have chemical weapons warheads for this missiles?

    Does israel have jets that can drop these weapons?
    Quote Quote  

  10. -70
    Sniper's Avatar
    Your friendly neighborhood Bills fan

    Status:
    Offline
    WPA:
    Join date:
    May 2002
    Posts:
    588
    vCash:
    1000
    Loc:
    Upstate NY
    Thanks / No Thanks
    My point is these chem suits are not a huge smoking gun... Every country has them. If Iraq is allowed to have them under the U.N. sanctions then I don't see how this is proof.
    Quote Quote  

Similar Threads

  1. For the liberals: why not McCain?
    By Dolphin39 in forum Political | War Forum
    Replies: 26
    Last Post: 03-20-2008, 08:07 PM
  2. I'm sick, I'm sick, I'm just disgusted!!
    By DolfanTom in forum The Depths of the Sea
    Replies: 59
    Last Post: 04-30-2007, 04:04 PM
  3. Replies: 11
    Last Post: 04-01-2005, 02:35 PM
  4. This guy wants to get rid of the liberals
    By ILikeMcMike in forum Political | War Forum
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 11-12-2004, 03:10 PM
  5. Liberals
    By iceblizzard69 in forum The Lounge
    Replies: 326
    Last Post: 02-19-2003, 03:46 PM

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •