Ok, guys I need to get my mind off the fins for a while. Did any of you get to see the Dallas / Cardinals game? Romo got blasted in the endzone, fumbled the ball and AZ got the T.D........er, no they didnt the old Tuck rule raised its ugly head again. This sucks. How can it be that if you sack the quarterback most times and he fumbles its a fubmble but the zebras can arbitraraly call it a tuck when its convenient. Well here are the rules that Dirk would propose to the NFL. See if you agree with me.
1) If the quarteback has the ball and loses it regardless of if his hand is moving in a passing motion or not its a free ball. Its a free ball if you intercept it so what the hell is the difference if his hand is moving.
2) if the quarterback has the ball and tucks it of hides it or sticks it up his butt, if the defender knocks the crap out of him and he drops the rock its a fumble.
3) If for any reason the quarter back drops the ball behind the line of scrimage before his knee hits the ground and is touched by a defender its a free ball>
Come on how hard is this. lets man up this rule!!!