Welcome to FinHeaven Fans Forums! We're glad to have you here. Please feel free to browse the forum. We'd like to invite you to join our community; doing so will enable you to view additional forums and post with our other members.



VIP Members don't see these ads. Join VIP Now
Page 5 of 18 FirstFirst 12345678910 ... LastLast
Results 41 to 50 of 179

Thread: Ron Paul: I don't accept the theory of evolution

  1. -41
    Waterlogged

    Status:
    Offline
    WPA:
    Join date:
    Sep 2011
    Posts:
    460
    vCash:
    1000
    Thanks / No Thanks
    Quote Originally Posted by tylerdolphin View Post
    Absolutely. Not apes as we know them, but we had a common ancestor.
    HUGE LOL!!

    I like how you changed your answer after you googled it.
    Quote Quote  

  2. -42
    tylerdolphin's Avatar
    More Smug than Birthday Dog

    Status:
    Offline
    WPA:
    Join date:
    Sep 2005
    Posts:
    12,222
    vCash:
    3490
    Thanks / No Thanks
    Chris Hanson, since you like asking trick questions that prove nothing in order to trap Locke on a technicality, Ill ask you a question that will actually lead to a point.

    Do you believe in the story of the Great Flood?




    Quote Quote  

  3. -43
    Waterlogged

    Status:
    Offline
    WPA:
    Join date:
    Sep 2011
    Posts:
    460
    vCash:
    1000
    Thanks / No Thanks
    Quote Originally Posted by Locke View Post


    I'm done. You don't even know the difference between microevolution and macroevolution, and what adaptation is. You guys are all the same. You get called out on your lack of understanding, then you get defensive and call the other person ignorant. It's almost like everyone got handed the same pamphlet on how to redirect an argument...
    Of course you're done. You're not smart enough to debate "evolution" with me, but you are smart enough to know when you're in over your head.
    Quote Quote  

  4. -44
    tylerdolphin's Avatar
    More Smug than Birthday Dog

    Status:
    Offline
    WPA:
    Join date:
    Sep 2005
    Posts:
    12,222
    vCash:
    3490
    Thanks / No Thanks
    Quote Originally Posted by ChrisHanson View Post
    Not true at all.
    Actually, it is. Will you even bother to read it if I find you links from credible sources?
    Quote Quote  

  5. -45
    Locke's Avatar
    They looked like strong hands.

    Status:
    Offline
    WPA:
    Join date:
    Aug 2008
    Posts:
    8,676
    vCash:
    3456
    Loc:
    Albuquerque, NM
    Thanks / No Thanks
    Quote Originally Posted by tylerdolphin View Post
    What in the world are you even talking about? Of course theres no clear point where one species becomes another. Thats like having a line where black gradually turns white and asking you to point to where "white" begins and black ends. Its nonsensical. The fossil record is chock full of our ancestors. Do we have every single link? No, because thats impossible. There no point where we became a human. Theres a **** ton of fossils showing the gradual transition of that though, as there is for many other species. Im not sure you understand the theory.
    I wouldn't bother man. This guy thinks that microevolution and adaptation are the same thing. This is like talking philosophy with a toddler...

    If I could take your pain and frame it, and hang it on my wall,
    maybe you would never have to hurt again...

    Quote Quote  

  6. -46
    tylerdolphin's Avatar
    More Smug than Birthday Dog

    Status:
    Offline
    WPA:
    Join date:
    Sep 2005
    Posts:
    12,222
    vCash:
    3490
    Thanks / No Thanks
    Quote Originally Posted by ChrisHanson View Post
    Of course you're done. You're not smart enough to debate "evolution" with me, but you are smart enough to know when you're in over your head.
    You didnt prove ****. You trapped Locke on a bull**** terminology technicality that doesnt prove anything. Locke know we didnt directly evolve from the apes we see today.
    Quote Quote  

  7. -47
    Waterlogged

    Status:
    Offline
    WPA:
    Join date:
    Sep 2011
    Posts:
    460
    vCash:
    1000
    Thanks / No Thanks
    Quote Originally Posted by tylerdolphin View Post
    Chris Hanson, since you like asking trick questions that prove nothing in order to trap Locke on a technicality, Ill ask you a question that will actually lead to a point.

    Do you believe in the story of the Great Flood?
    Trick question? It wasn't a trick. It was me making a point. The point that I'm wasting my time because no one here has proven they even understand evolution. Which is HILARIOUS because they believe in it so strongly.
    Quote Quote  

  8. -48
    tylerdolphin's Avatar
    More Smug than Birthday Dog

    Status:
    Offline
    WPA:
    Join date:
    Sep 2005
    Posts:
    12,222
    vCash:
    3490
    Thanks / No Thanks
    Quote Originally Posted by ChrisHanson View Post
    HUGE LOL!!

    I like how you changed your answer after you googled it.
    Actually I did not google it. I typed what I wrote, realized that you would call me out on a technicality, and literally edited my answer 10 seconds after i posted it. Nice try though.
    Quote Quote  

  9. -49
    Locke's Avatar
    They looked like strong hands.

    Status:
    Offline
    WPA:
    Join date:
    Aug 2008
    Posts:
    8,676
    vCash:
    3456
    Loc:
    Albuquerque, NM
    Thanks / No Thanks
    Quote Originally Posted by tylerdolphin View Post
    Chris Hanson, since you like asking trick questions that prove nothing in order to trap Locke on a technicality, Ill ask you a question that will actually lead to a point.

    Do you believe in the story of the Great Flood?
    Meh, I don't think I was trapped. You ask a general question, you get a general answer. This is what happens when you talk to people who have rudimentary or partial understanding of a topic. I stopped having these debates long ago, not sure why I engaged him. The guy doesn't even realize he is talking to an actual scientist...
    Quote Quote  

  10. -50
    Waterlogged

    Status:
    Offline
    WPA:
    Join date:
    Sep 2011
    Posts:
    460
    vCash:
    1000
    Thanks / No Thanks
    Quote Originally Posted by Locke View Post
    I wouldn't bother man. This guy thinks that microevolution and adaptation are the same thing. This is like talking philosophy with a toddler...
    Adaptations are caused by variations due, mostly, to environment. Microevolution...monkey-boy. hahahahahahaha

    Snow leopard is white= adaptation or microevolution.

    Frog into prince..lol...(what you believe) is macroevolution and a farce...hahahahahaha

    ---------- Post added at 03:54 PM ---------- Previous post was at 03:54 PM ----------

    Quote Originally Posted by Locke View Post
    Meh, I don't think I was trapped. You ask a general question, you get a general answer. This is what happens when you talk to people who have rudimentary or partial understanding of a topic. I stopped having these debates long ago, not sure why I engaged him. The guy doesn't even realize he is talking to an actual scientist...
    Scientist of what? lol!
    Quote Quote  

Similar Threads

  1. I have to accept it!
    By phinfan2003 in forum Miami Dolphins Forum
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 11-07-2010, 10:01 PM
  2. Replies: 6
    Last Post: 10-22-2009, 12:01 AM
  3. Should I accept this trade
    By t2thejz in forum Fantasy Sports
    Replies: 8
    Last Post: 09-28-2005, 08:08 PM
  4. "The theory of evolution has never been stronger.."
    By SkapePhin in forum Political | War Forum
    Replies: 80
    Last Post: 07-05-2005, 04:49 PM
  5. Are you willing to accept...
    By HybridPHIN 23 in forum Miami Dolphins Forum
    Replies: 12
    Last Post: 01-26-2005, 08:16 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •