Welcome to FinHeaven Fans Forums! We're glad to have you here. Please feel free to browse the forum. We'd like to invite you to join our community; doing so will enable you to view additional forums and post with our other members.



VIP Members don't see these ads. Join VIP Now
Page 1 of 4 1234 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 36

Thread: Change "Suck For Luck" to "Luck Sucks"!!

  1. -1
    Starter

    Status:
    Offline
    WPA:
    Join date:
    Aug 2011
    Posts:
    127
    vCash:
    1000
    Thanks / No Thanks

    Change "Suck For Luck" to "Luck Sucks"!!

    I've seen LUCK before, and solid "competition", and I watched LUCK for about 85% of the game against OREGON, and I was impressed...BADLY!

    1) He makes poor decisions, like everyone else. I don't know what he's thinking--or seeing--sometimes, especially against a good opponent.

    2) He doesn't handle pressure well at all, especially considering he has "tools" to do so. (E.g., his mobility) And then he panics, and makes mistakes beyond even stupidity.

    3) Half of his passes "flutter", and while he has enough "arm strength", that flutter makes his passes harder to handle. That's too big an advantage to give a CB at the next level, especially on one throw that a very good NFL QB MUST be able to make: the 20 yard "out" to the wide side of the field.

    4) His "deep ball" isn't much at all.

    I will watch LUCK in whatever Bowl Game STANFORD goes to: that should provide another game against solid competition. But I'm beginning to wonder about LUCK. I think back to PHIL SIMMS' recent analysis of LUCK's "game", and find myself agreeing w/him more and more.
    Quote Quote  

  2. -2
    The Confessor's Avatar
    Doesnt play well with others

    Status:
    Offline
    WPA:
    Join date:
    Jun 2004
    Posts:
    8,931
    vCash:
    1000
    Loc:
    In a Van down by the rive
    Thanks / No Thanks
    Sorry, but this is just silly, and incredibly inaccurate.

    I am starting to see why S4Lers get so frustrated.
    Quote Quote  

  3. -3
    Starter

    Status:
    Offline
    WPA:
    Join date:
    Aug 2011
    Posts:
    127
    vCash:
    1000
    Thanks / No Thanks
    Quote Originally Posted by The Confessor View Post
    Sorry, but this is just silly, and incredibly inaccurate...
    Says who, you? I know what I saw against OREGON, and I'm beginning to agree w/PHIL SIMMS's analysis.
    Quote Quote  

  4. -4
    The Confessor's Avatar
    Doesnt play well with others

    Status:
    Offline
    WPA:
    Join date:
    Jun 2004
    Posts:
    8,931
    vCash:
    1000
    Loc:
    In a Van down by the rive
    Thanks / No Thanks
    Quote Originally Posted by Oradeana View Post
    Says who, you? I know what I saw against OREGON, and I'm beginning to agree w/PHIL SIMMS's analysis.
    How many games have you seen Luck play?

    Phill Simms is a Maladroit that took too many hits to the head.
    Quote Quote  

  5. -5
    AllFinsAllDay's Avatar
    Pro Bowler

    Status:
    Offline
    WPA:
    Join date:
    Oct 2009
    Posts:
    1,327
    vCash:
    5304
    Thanks / No Thanks
    he didn't play well and its a little concerning especially this one of the times he played aganist a decent defense. Miami if they have to take a shot at him even if he a bust, there is no way they cannot take him and be able to sell tickets.

    Its almost like they are in a lose lose situation he might not be the 2nd coming of Elway but you just have to make the leap, but its going to burn if he does suck when he gets the pro's. No one knows this and if they claim to they are clueless
    Quote Quote  

  6. -6
    JCane's Avatar
    Administrator

    Status:
    Offline
    WPA:
    Join date:
    Jul 2008
    Posts:
    15,870
    vCash:
    8185
    Loc:
    Lauderville, Florilina
    Thanks / No Thanks
    Wow lol. Bad decisions? No college QB who calls his own plays makes too many bad decisions out else he rides the bench.

    Quote Quote  

  7. -7
    Clipse's Avatar
    mediocrity sucks

    Status:
    Offline
    WPA:
    Join date:
    Aug 2005
    Posts:
    13,001
    vCash:
    2576
    Loc:
    Fort Drum, New York
    Thanks / No Thanks
    Bad thread is bad.
    Quote Quote  

  8. -8
    hooshoops's Avatar
    Ryan tannehill...like a boss

    Status:
    Offline
    WPA:
    Join date:
    Jul 2008
    Posts:
    31,072
    vCash:
    24661
    Loc:
    richmond va
    Thanks / No Thanks
    lucks problem at stanford is when they face a team with elite athletes at wr the stanford group can't win consistently...pretty much luck is left trying to make plays with his te's and the running game...i do know the post pattern off the outside than back inside move to whalen for the td i think it was the timing of that ball could not have been better...that play from at the los presnap thru the catch was textbook...couldn't have been done better...and it was a rope

    this is the same concern i talked with magoo about after the usc game...when the stanford cardinal play against teams who can limit the running game and press man the wrs ie lsu or bama etc they are gonna be in trouble...cause the wrs are pretty much pedestrian at lucks disposal...
    hoops scoops 2012 season ..."in 2014 ryan tannehill etches his name in stone amongst the games elite qbs"..."ryan tannehill and andrew luck will carry the afc for the next decade plus the way peyton manning and tom brady have this last decade plus"
    Quote Quote  

  9. -9
    The Confessor's Avatar
    Doesnt play well with others

    Status:
    Offline
    WPA:
    Join date:
    Jun 2004
    Posts:
    8,931
    vCash:
    1000
    Loc:
    In a Van down by the rive
    Thanks / No Thanks
    Quote Originally Posted by hooshoops View Post
    lucks problem at stanford is when they face a team with elite athletes at wr the stanford group can't win consistently...pretty much luck is left trying to make plays with his te's and the running game...i do know the post pattern off the outside than back inside move to whalen for the td i think it was the timing of that ball could not have been better...that play from at the los presnap thru the catch was textbook...couldn't have been done better...and it was a rope

    this is the same concern i talked with magoo about after the usc game...when the stanford cardinal play against teams who can limit the running game and press man the wrs ie lsu or bama etc they are gonna be in trouble...cause the wrs are pretty much pedestrian at lucks disposal...
    So, that means if we had him, we would still have the same problems?
    In the Pro's, he will be seeing better defenses than he has ever faced in his life, and the includes taking away his running game. He hasn't seen many great defenses to date, but he will at the next level. Pretty much every weekend.
    Quote Quote  

  10. -10
    hooshoops's Avatar
    Ryan tannehill...like a boss

    Status:
    Offline
    WPA:
    Join date:
    Jul 2008
    Posts:
    31,072
    vCash:
    24661
    Loc:
    richmond va
    Thanks / No Thanks
    Quote Originally Posted by The Confessor View Post
    So, that means if we had him, we would still have the same problems?
    In the Pro's, he will be seeing better defenses than he has ever faced in his life, and the includes taking away his running game. He hasn't seen many great defenses to date, but he will at the next level. Pretty much every weekend.
    it means the wrs he plays with right now blow when faced up with high end competition...i don't think our wrs blow...he'll make plays with them...montgomery the freshman has some talent but he's raw and he's not special anyways whalen is more a route runner who makes plays off the timing of the throws from luck and will never outrun anyone...owusus garbage

    forgot to mention the ball luck threw b/t the safety and corner in the tight red for another td that ball was pure money...saw it roped it split the defenders 6 points...that was an nfl throw...can't say enough how money this kids in the red zone...something we struggled mightily with henne
    Quote Quote  

Similar Threads

  1. Fasano calls Dolphans "sick" for cheering for Suck For Luck
    By Xbrett82us in forum Miami Dolphins Forum
    Replies: 67
    Last Post: 10-29-2011, 01:22 PM
  2. Replies: 4
    Last Post: 10-21-2011, 12:18 PM
  3. Merged: Luck Calls "Suck for Luck" Campaigns Stupid
    By Hayden Fox in forum Miami Dolphins Forum
    Replies: 204
    Last Post: 10-17-2011, 11:55 PM
  4. Do "Suck 4 Luck" fans literally root against Miami during the games?
    By normaldude in forum Miami Dolphins Forum
    Replies: 42
    Last Post: 10-09-2011, 02:15 PM
  5. "Suck For Luck" AND "Kill For Bill"
    By Da GODfather in forum Miami Dolphins Forum
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 10-03-2011, 10:31 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •