Weeden and Weinke are two completely different people. Weeden is much more accurate, has a much quicker release and comprehends schemes a lot better then Weinke could. The only similarity between the two is their age.
You can't base the success or failure of a prospect on the failure of a different prospect.
Those opinions of Weinke are of course your opinions I dont agree and Im sure there are many actual scouts that would not agree. I never said they were the same I said similarly rated. If Weinke was the right age he would have been drafted 1st round and I assume Weeden would be a mid to late first round pick also. I can base that teams find it quite unwise to spend high draft picks on 29 year old rookies
Faux News making people dumber and less informed by the minute.