FWIW, Cam Newton, who coming out was a much better QB than buttfumble is even now, did worse than Moore with an upgraded offense including 2 TE studs plus everyone you mentioned and his own legs as an additional weapon, not to mention a coach who cared and wasn't a lame duck going 1-5 and 2-10 vs Moore's 1-4 in 2010. So your argument is only relevent if you're wearing homer glasses. And as far as reaching 2 title games, doesn't that mean he also lost 2 title games? But you know, I will give him credit for a legitimate run in 2010 but even reaching the post season in 2009 was more due to Peyton Manning and Jim Caldwell so I won't even get into the competition before Peyton and Colts spanked and blanked buttfumble in the last 31 minutes when it actually counted.
Originally Posted by nyjunc
Since you take such pride in losing big games, it's important to note that "winning 2 post season games" is the best the jest ever did, and that includes that farce of a 2 game post season 1969 superbowl "victory" so to that extent I'll grant you credit where due
Either Tim Tebow is a dummass or he's smart, you'll have to decide since obviously he felt he had a better chance of beating out buttfumble than Gabbert for the starter job. And if he thought he couldn't beat out arguably the worst QB in the league last season, what does that make buttfumble?
Dear Math, please grow up and solve your own problems, I'm tired of solving them for you. -Anon