This is a horrible post
This is a horrible post
I agree that Romo gets undue critcism, considering a good skillset, but considering that by post-30 age, he's yet to demonstrate mental toughness, when it comes to trading T/hill and his uncertain but potentially unlimited upside, this is a case where I'd prefer the "two in the bush" over "a bird in the hand!"
Wisdom from a "QB Whisperer::
"No we have our FRANCHISE QB and I want to keep him rather than get 2 guys who may or may not be productive NFL players.
Palmer's situation is different and if I had my choice between Palmer and buttfumble, I'd take buttfumble"
Post of the year 2012
Stupidest thread ever made. We just drafted our future, and hasn't even played a down and you want to trade him for Romo?!?!?!?! Just unbelievable.
This thread was made right BEFORE the draft and it was titled something like trading down to the cowboys for romo and their first. Someone changed the thread title.
“Pro football is like nuclear warfare. There are no winners, only survivors.”
Dr. Jules Hilbert: Hell Harold, you could just eat nothing but pancakes if you wanted.
Harold Crick: What is wrong with you? Hey, I don't want to eat nothing but pancakes, I want to live! I mean, who in their right mind in a choice between pancakes and living chooses pancakes?
Dr. Jules Hilbert: Harold, if you pause to think, you'd realize that that answer is inextricably contingent upon the type of life being led... and, of course, the quality of the pancakes.
Who on earth would come up with a half-assed hair-brained thought like this, let alone make it public knowledge. Yea, lets give them our future and we'll take their past. Absolutely ridiculous idea.
Please, we now FINALLY have a mega-talented young first round potential franchise quarterback, and your suggesting giving that up for a very average NFL qb?
"Fiedler did not have the arm strength of Tannehill, but overall he was a much better QB."
Attack the Person, Not the Ideas:
Attack the person in some way. For example:
- Attack their expertise, questioning their qualifications or experience
- Comment on their inability to make a good argument
- Attach them to discredited others
You are not qualified to make such a statement.
You would say that, wouldn't you.
And who do you think is going to believe you.
Attacking the Person is a form of distraction, forcing them into defense and away from their argument.
Romo is done Tanny is just getting started. NO Trade..