Welcome to FinHeaven Fans Forums! We're glad to have you here. Please feel free to browse the forum. We'd like to invite you to join our community; doing so will enable you to view additional forums and post with our other members.



VIP Members don't see these ads. Join VIP Now
Page 164 of 1329 FirstFirst ... 159160161162163164165166167168169 ... LastLast
Results 1,631 to 1,640 of 13290

Thread: POFO Anything Goes Thread. ((Warning do not enter if you can't handle fire))

  1. -1631
    tylerdolphin's Avatar
    More Smug than Birthday Dog

    Status:
    Offline
    WPA:
    Join date:
    Sep 2005
    Posts:
    12,207
    vCash:
    3396
    Thanks / No Thanks
    So theoretically if the election is decided by less than 10 electoral votes, one asshat can basically go rogue and spin the election the other way?




    Quote Quote  

  2. -1632
    Valandui's Avatar
    The Fluke

    Status:
    Offline
    WPA:
    Join date:
    May 2008
    Posts:
    9,469
    vCash:
    11068
    Loc:
    Lakeland, FL
    Thanks / No Thanks
    Quote Originally Posted by TheWalrus View Post
    The founding fathers put the electoral college into place because they were scared as **** of the people. As wealthy and well educated landowners who largely despised the common man, they wanted a buffer zone in case the people elected someone they found completely objectionable. So they created the concept of electors -- presuming the electors would be wealthy landowners like they were -- and gave those electors the ability to vote for whomever they wanted no matter what the state they came from had done.

    That was the idea, anyway. I only know of one instance -- there might be others -- of an elector changing his vote, and that was when James Monroe ran the table and won every state. One elector felt that only Washington should win every vote so he defied his state and voted for the other guy. To this day I'm pretty sure only Washington has won every elector.

    Anyway, yeah. It's a stupid system, and in my view has always been one. Among other things, it overvalues the small states, since every state -- no matter how small -- gets at least three electoral votes. And it renders huge swaths of the country irrelevant, and therefore ignored, every presidential election cycle.
    This is all true, but it does make the small states have some say in who the President is. Otherwise, New York and LA are basically imposing their will on the rest of the country. The system is still ****ed up, but I'm more concerned about how you're considered unelectable if you don't win Iowa or New Hampshire in the primaries than this.

    Valandui's Weekly Music Video

    Conducting From the Grave: The Rise
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RYQ2aKgXafw
    Quote Quote  

  3. -1633
    TheWalrus's Avatar
    1/7/14

    Status:
    Offline
    WPA:
    Join date:
    Dec 2011
    Posts:
    7,452
    vCash:
    24360
    Thanks / No Thanks
    Quote Originally Posted by tylerdolphin View Post
    So theoretically if the election is decided by less than 10 electoral votes, one asshat can basically go rogue and spin the election the other way?
    Every elector can vote for whoever they want. Now, they way they get chosen that doesn't tend to happen. But they're all at liberty to go rogue.
    Quote Quote  

  4. -1634
    TheWalrus's Avatar
    1/7/14

    Status:
    Offline
    WPA:
    Join date:
    Dec 2011
    Posts:
    7,452
    vCash:
    24360
    Thanks / No Thanks
    Quote Originally Posted by Valandui View Post
    This is all true, but it does make the small states have some say in who the President is. Otherwise, New York and LA are basically imposing their will on the rest of the country.
    Imposing their will? Let's just go to a straight up and down popular vote. Every person in every state gets an equal say. As it is, a vote in Wyoming is worth 300+ percent of an average vote relative to the electoral college while a vote in California or Texas is only worth in the low 80s of an average vote. I find it hard to see a way in which that's fair.

    One person. One vote. May the best man win. No more of this haranguing over how 10,000 people in Ohio get to decide who the next president is. It's ridiculous.

    The system is still ****ed up, but I'm more concerned about how you're considered unelectable if you don't win Iowa or New Hampshire in the primaries than this.
    This I agree with. I'm not sure how to fix it but it's a ridiculous system, especially since both states are like 99% white.
    Quote Quote  

  5. -1635
    Dolphins9954's Avatar
    Pro Bowler

    Status:
    Online
    WPA:
    Join date:
    Apr 2005
    Posts:
    10,010
    vCash:
    6103
    Thanks / No Thanks



    I voted against evil and myself for sheriff.





    "Politics is the Art of Looking for Trouble, Finding it Everywhere, Diagnosing it Incorrectly, and Applying the Wrong Remedies"
    Quote Quote  

  6. -1636
    ROADRUNNER's Avatar
    Super Moderator

    Status:
    Offline
    WPA:
    Join date:
    Dec 2008
    Posts:
    9,204
    vCash:
    66
    Loc:
    Aberdeen
    Thanks / No Thanks
    Arsenal shield
    Quote Quote  

  7. -1637
    Spesh's Avatar
    Fat Kid

    Status:
    Offline
    WPA:
    Join date:
    Apr 2007
    Posts:
    7,576
    vCash:
    1372
    Thanks / No Thanks
    Quote Originally Posted by ROADRUNNER View Post
    Speaking of .gifs, i desperately need one of Karl Rove looking off camera clutching a pen in his hand frantically crunching the numbers while on fox news.
    "I'm not here to be a distraction," Pouncey said.
    http://espn.go.com/nfl/story/_/id/10...ogical-testing
    Quote Quote  

  8. -1638
    rob19's Avatar
    Soul Rebel

    Status:
    Offline
    WPA:
    Join date:
    Mar 2006
    Posts:
    7,060
    vCash:
    5618
    Loc:
    Georgia
    Thanks / No Thanks
    1972 Dolphins Logo
    Quote Originally Posted by Spesh View Post
    Speaking of .gifs, i desperately need one of Karl Rove looking off camera clutching a pen in his hand frantically crunching the numbers while on fox news.
    If you can find me the video I could probably do it for you
    Quote Quote  

  9. -1639
    NY8123's Avatar
    Sophisticated Redneck

    Status:
    Offline
    WPA:
    Join date:
    Jan 2008
    Posts:
    11,465
    vCash:
    3538
    Loc:
    out in the Ding Weeds
    Thanks / No Thanks
    Quote Originally Posted by TheWalrus View Post
    The founding fathers put the electoral college into place because they were scared as **** of the people. As wealthy and well educated landowners who largely despised the common man, they wanted a buffer zone in case the people elected someone they found completely objectionable. So they created the concept of electors -- presuming the electors would be wealthy landowners like they were -- and gave those electors the ability to vote for whomever they wanted no matter what the state they came from had done.

    That was the idea, anyway. I only know of one instance -- there might be others -- of an elector changing his vote, and that was when James Monroe ran the table and won every state. One elector felt that only Washington should win every vote so he defied his state and voted for the other guy. To this day I'm pretty sure only Washington has won every elector.

    Anyway, yeah. It's a stupid system, and in my view has always been one. Among other things, it overvalues the small states, since every state -- no matter how small -- gets at least three electoral votes. And it renders huge swaths of the country irrelevant, and therefore ignored, every presidential election cycle.
    and there in lies the difference between a republic (the Untied States) and a Democracy.
    Peace and Humptiness Forever


    Quote Quote  

  10. -1640
    Dolphins9954's Avatar
    Pro Bowler

    Status:
    Online
    WPA:
    Join date:
    Apr 2005
    Posts:
    10,010
    vCash:
    6103
    Thanks / No Thanks
    I got at least 4 votes for Sheriff but it didn't show up on the tally. I claim fraud.
    Quote Quote  

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 6718
    Last Post: 08-08-2013, 03:17 PM
  2. Replies: 1716
    Last Post: 02-04-2008, 03:37 PM
  3. can we keep this thread alive in the PoFo?
    By Maynard the Hammer in forum Questions and Suggestions Forum
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 05-12-2006, 11:40 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •