---------- Post added at 11:26 PM ---------- Previous post was at 11:24 PM ----------
Ah yes. The old liberal way. If you don't agree you must be a racist. God forbid anyone think differently than you.
I went ahead and looked up a few of Hitchens' old columns. It is funny to see the similarities.
He notes how whenever someone questions of criticizes Mormonism as it relates to the man who might be President, people will immediately try to say you are being prejudiced. Jared did just that.
Obama and Romney don't need religion to qualify their douchebag status. Anyone using that against them is a douchebag themselves.
"Politics is the Art of Looking for Trouble, Finding it Everywhere, Diagnosing it Incorrectly, and Applying the Wrong Remedies"
Romney and Obama by all accounts seem like good husbands and fathers. They seem generous and thoughtful of others. Even though i disagree with them both, that is usually my judge for moral character. Their religion means minimal to me.
Does this thread come with a fuse? Because religion and politics in the same thread might as well be an atom bomb.
It will blow and take half the pofo with it.
Insert pithy saying here.
Mitt Romney turned 31 in 1978. In that time, he had served as a missionary, rising to co-acting President of the mission, and had convinced his wife to convert to Mormonism. Of course, the Romney family had five generations of upper-level membership in the church, one that institutionalized discrimination against black people. Romney's response?Originally Posted by Wikipedia
So did he condone the racism of the church, did not know the tenets of his church, or did not care?Originally Posted by Wikipedia
If liberal means "Stating the obvious", then yes, it appears I'm on the money here. Will you go hand them out dressed as a ghost?Ah yes. The old liberal way. If you don't agree you must be a racist. God forbid anyone think differently than you.
Rev Wright all over again with a twist of another f'up religion. BULLSH!T!!!!