Simply because holding to axioms that you have no reason for holding to given your worldview is irrational. Are you really going to admit that only the Christian worldview is rational?
Like I said, just because you say God does these things, doesn't make it true.
Me saying it no, but me proving it through logical syllogisms and negation as I have done certainly does prove it is true.
You don't have proof. There's a reason people ask "do you believe in God?", and not "do you know about God", because the existence of God can't be proven, nor disproven.
You are confusing truth with persuasion, the number of people who are persuaded by or who believe a certain argument is completely irrelevant to the truth of that argument. You asserting there is no proof of God is also irrelevant since I have already provided a completely valid and thus un-refuted argument that does prove God exists.
Of course it was; the whole article was written by an atheist and the majority of the criticism section has nothing to do with Humphrey’s cosmological model. I am just appalled at the fact you seem to believe that a user-generated site like Wikipedia proves anything at all. Humphrey’s has addressed every single one of those criticisms in both his book and subsequent articles. I don’t even subscribe to his model, but your “refutation” of it is just ridiculous.