Welcome to FinHeaven Fans Forums! We're glad to have you here. Please feel free to browse the forum. We'd like to invite you to join our community; doing so will enable you to view additional forums and post with our other members.



VIP Members don't see these ads. Join VIP Now
Results 1 to 9 of 9

Thread: ACA to cost $84 Billion less than originally thought

  1. -1
    CedarPhin's Avatar
    Finheaven Hall of Shame

    Status:
    Offline
    WPA:
    Join date:
    Apr 2008
    Posts:
    22,100
    vCash:
    1000
    Loc:
    Hotel California
    Thanks / No Thanks

    ACA to cost $84 Billion less than originally thought

    Per the CBO and The Economist, the best news magazine of all time.

    http://www.economist.com/blogs/democ...stalballoffice

    THE Congressional Budget Office (CBO) excels in making predictions. It is its primary mission. Quite often, those predictions must change. Things come upófor example, there was the small matter of a certain Supreme Court decision in June. This week, for the first time since the courtís ruling, the CBO
    adjusted its projections for spending under Barack Obamaís health reform. The number crunchers had two main changes. The courtís decision meant there would be 3m more uninsured Americans in 2022. The net cost would drop to $1,168 billion from 2012 to 2022, $84 billion below projections before the Supreme Courtís ruling.


    Discuss.

    Quote Quote  

  2. -2
    Tetragrammaton's Avatar
    Hall Of Famer

    Status:
    Offline
    WPA:
    Join date:
    Apr 2006
    Posts:
    9,428
    vCash:
    1578
    Thanks / No Thanks
    The Economist is always top notch. Should be required reading for people who want to talk seriously.

    Love or hate this bill, it has many financial incentives.
    Quote Quote  

  3. -3
    Dolphins9954's Avatar
    Pro Bowler

    Status:
    Offline
    WPA:
    Join date:
    Apr 2005
    Posts:
    10,028
    vCash:
    6241
    Thanks / No Thanks
    It's still a crap bill.







    "Politics is the Art of Looking for Trouble, Finding it Everywhere, Diagnosing it Incorrectly, and Applying the Wrong Remedies"
    Quote Quote  

  4. -4
    trojanma's Avatar
    FinHeaven VIP

    Status:
    Offline
    WPA:
    Join date:
    Sep 2010
    Posts:
    1,617
    vCash:
    3832
    Loc:
    Magic City
    Thanks / No Thanks
    2013 Dolphins LogoTannehill 17Dolphins Homer
    Quote Originally Posted by Tetragrammaton View Post
    The Economist is always top notch. Should be required reading for people who want to talk seriously.

    Love or hate this bill, it has many financial incentives.
    Totally agree on the economist. I am a subscriber.

    If I were a supporter of the ACA I would not go parading this fact around.
    This is actually a disaster(for the aca) that will have broad implications. Either the governors will buckle and take the medicaid money or the heart of the ACA is dead unless it is changed therefore the estimate changes.

    Let me give a little background first.
    Generally speaking Medicaid is a state run program that covers children and their mothers. It is extremely bare bones and many private practices don't take it but it provides a vehicle for basic care to those below the poverty line.
    The ACA was going to subsidize the expansion of Medicaid to all people who are in poverty.
    Under the aca middle class folks will get healthcare through work or will be able to get a government subsidy for individual private insurance. The subsidy works on a sliding scale, but stops at those who are below poverty since it is assumed that they would have gotten Medicaid.

    As some republican state governors are saying no thanks to a federally subsidized expansion of Medicaid for the people below the poverty line this leaves a huge hole of people, who happen to be the poorest, uninsured.
    You can't simply extend the sliding scale because the cost would balloon and heavily subsidized private insurance isn't really the best thing for folks in poverty.
    Either way the "savings" are an illusion because the source of them should be unacceptable to the supporters of the ACA.
    Quote Quote  

  5. -5
    Eshlemon's Avatar
    FinHeaven VIP

    Status:
    Offline
    WPA:
    Join date:
    Jan 2004
    Posts:
    4,819
    vCash:
    1437
    Loc:
    Greensboro, NC
    Thanks / No Thanks
    Only the beltway can tell us estimates of increasing government spending 1.70 trillion and policy and taxing revenues 12.5 is great at saving 84 billion against the deficit! How about lets cut the ACA spending in half and save 650 billion?

    To paraphrase Carl Sagan mankinds future is in jeopardy as long as the Earth remains humanity's only home. Time to take action with my NASA Act. Will be costly at a trillion, but with the payroll FNCA and policy changes that will bring in 1.1 trillion in revenue. We are going knock an entire $100 billion of the deficit!
    Quote Quote  

  6. -6
    CedarPhin's Avatar
    Finheaven Hall of Shame

    Status:
    Offline
    WPA:
    Join date:
    Apr 2008
    Posts:
    22,100
    vCash:
    1000
    Loc:
    Hotel California
    Thanks / No Thanks
    Space exploration would be an awesome way to get money flowing. Might get some excitement from the populace too.
    Quote Quote  

  7. -7
    trojanma's Avatar
    FinHeaven VIP

    Status:
    Offline
    WPA:
    Join date:
    Sep 2010
    Posts:
    1,617
    vCash:
    3832
    Loc:
    Magic City
    Thanks / No Thanks
    2013 Dolphins LogoTannehill 17Dolphins Homer
    Mitt really needs to stop travelling. I think the jet-lag is warping his mind.
    Now in Isreal he came out in high praises of Isreal's single payer health care system that does more with less than the US.

    Or perhaps the republicans are so busy trying to outmanouver Obama's triangulating strategies that they found themselves on the other side of the circle.

    http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/...ven-down-costs.
    Quote Quote  

  8. -8
    NY8123's Avatar
    Sophisticated Redneck

    Status:
    Offline
    WPA:
    Join date:
    Jan 2008
    Posts:
    11,479
    vCash:
    3622
    Loc:
    out in the Ding Weeds
    Thanks / No Thanks
    This makes perfect sense to me, as this bill did from day one, it takes away government burden and accountability for low income Americans and it pushes more middle class folk into the private sector allowing medical heath care providers to profit even more.

    Some how everyone on Capital Hill won on this one, the lobbyist got their increased revenue flow, the government lost accountability and all at the expense of the American people and their dollars. What a classic case of taking it in the ass without lube.
    Peace and Humptiness Forever


    Quote Quote  

  9. -9
    trojanma's Avatar
    FinHeaven VIP

    Status:
    Offline
    WPA:
    Join date:
    Sep 2010
    Posts:
    1,617
    vCash:
    3832
    Loc:
    Magic City
    Thanks / No Thanks
    2013 Dolphins LogoTannehill 17Dolphins Homer
    Quote Originally Posted by NY8123 View Post
    This makes perfect sense to me, as this bill did from day one, it takes away government burden and accountability for low income Americans and it pushes more middle class folk into the private sector allowing medical heath care providers to profit even more.

    Some how everyone on Capital Hill won on this one, the lobbyist got their increased revenue flow, the government lost accountability and all at the expense of the American people and their dollars. What a classic case of taking it in the ass without lube.
    You are wrong my friend. Not quite sure where you are getting your facts from.

    The ACA is not going to be a benefit to doctors. It is actually going to bankrupt many small clinics since it essentially asks them to see more patients for the same pool of money.
    1. Medicaid patients are net money losers to small clinics because the reimbursement by the government is so low. That is why many private practices don't take them as patients(this also applies to medicare to a lesser degree). Increasing the fold of Medicaid patients will only strain capacity of non-profit/state clinics even further(since the private clinics wont take them). There is a huge lack primary physicians in this country and with a massive expansion of coverage that problem is going to get a lot bigger. Where are all these patients gonna go?
    2. ACA is going to freeze/reduce payouts by medicare essentially forcing physicians to see more patients to break even.
    3. Hospitals on paper should break even as less uninsured people will offset the reduced payouts.
    4. The big winner seems to be Insurance companies who will get many more customers and had to make only cosmetic changes as a concession.
    Quote Quote  

Similar Threads

  1. AT&T says new HC will cost them 1 billion dollars per quarter
    By FinFan 13 in forum Political | War Forum
    Replies: 64
    Last Post: 03-29-2010, 01:06 PM
  2. Fred Evans in more trouble than originally thought
    By Hudman in forum Miami Dolphins Forum
    Replies: 8
    Last Post: 06-28-2007, 03:10 AM
  3. Fins Have Less Cap Room Then Originally Thought
    By Crypt Keeper in forum Salary Cap Forum
    Replies: 18
    Last Post: 02-10-2007, 01:28 PM
  4. Draft not as deep at RB than originally thought?
    By NJPHIN34 in forum Miami Dolphins Forum
    Replies: 18
    Last Post: 04-07-2005, 06:52 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •