Maybe.Mark was the next hot young QB at one point too, watch how fast opinions change if Kaep, RGIII, etc... struggle.
Perhaps if you'd understand English you'd get it. I said you make it seem like he's a HOF QB. That is the opposite of you saying he already was one.please find one post where I ever said Mark was going to be a HOF QB? I love when people make things up b/c they have nothing else.
– On Sanchez’s regression and lack of WRs: “He was on top of the world the first two years, but then every year they seemed to take his weapons away. … He was throwing to guys that I didn’t know their names. … ‘I worked out Tuesday, I’m the next starting receiver.’ I’m like, who’s this guy?”
---------- Post added at 03:26 PM ---------- Previous post was at 03:24 PM ----------
If Sanchez is good, why will nobody trade for him? He can be had for a used dry rotten condom, yet nobody wants him. I suppose all the GMs are average fans as well. Glad youre here levitating over everyone t show us the error in our ways.
More from Scott:
– On Geno Smith vs. Mark Sanchez: “Let’s be honest, if Mark can’t go, he’s putting his future as a starter in the NFL in jeopardy.
Interesting that he didn't say his future as a starter with the Jets. He said future as a starter in the NFL. That is basically what Tomlinson said.
That's something an average fan doesn't consider.
mark is going to have to be a backup for a little while and when the starter gets hurt he'll get another shot. It will be up to him to take advantage.
If Sanchez was as good as you think he is, he wouldn't have to be a backup and wait until a starter gets injured to get another opportunity. If Rivers, Romo or any other QB you think Mark is better than got cut, do you think that they would have to be a backup somewhere? Are GM's just average fans that only care about fantasy numbers?
Never go to the Library without your shotgun.