What cracks me up is when it comes to things like radiometric dating, Waldorf becomes the ultimate skeptic. But when he talks about 6000 year old dinosaurs coexisting with humans, all of that skepticism just goes away. Funny how he requires so little evidence when something confirms his beliefs.
Apparently the mentioning of dragons in the bible and China (which could be any number of animals), 1 biologist's story in 1983, and an aboriginal's drawing is sufficient proof for something that confirm's Waldorf's beliefs. However, the fact that mulitple radiometric methods come up with the same age of old rocks, and that these ages line up to other methods of dating such as tree rings, etc....well that just isn't good enough for Waldorf.