Not at all, you apparently didn’t understand me.
You listed off the names of a bunch of government agencies as Paul’s biggest contributors, but when I pointed out that such a thing legally can’t happen you changed it to private contributors who used to or currently belong to such agencies.
That he isn’t bought and paid for by corporate interests.
Corporations create jobs and wealth for everyone else, I see no problem here.
Isn’t Romney GOP as well?
Yup, and that’s why veteran’s support him over Obama by 24 percentage points.
“Athiest- A person who denies or disbelieves the existence of a supreme being or beings.”
That’s the more traditional definition; the New Atheists such as George Smith define atheism as simply the lack of belief in a God or gods, which means they would certainly claim you. I don’t really care whether you consider yourself atheistic or agnostic, you’re still anti-Christian which is all that concerns me.
I’m not saying their isn’t a God, but unlike yourself I’m not going to claim to be able to prove he exists through the use of circular reasoning.
Its statements like this that really demonstrates your philosophical ignorance, all reasoning is inherently circular, which is completely fine. I believe you are trying to refer to a circular argument which doesn’t actually prove anything; of course my argument was not a circular argument because the conclusion was not simply a restatement of either of the two premises. You just didn’t like it; which is completely fine, but you simply not liking something is a bit irrelevant to me.
Also a key note in that definition Statler, is the word BELIEVE, as in, a BELIEF in God. Want me to define belief while were at it?
Are you really trying to say you in fact do not lack a belief in God? So you do believe in God?
What part of “it goes both ways”, escaped you?
You never said that, you simply posted a video of Romney. If that is really your position then your argument is moot, both candidates make promises they can’t keep, ok I still support Romney between the two because I support his overall position and philosophy more.