[QUOTE=Statler Waldorf;1064456276]First, the Bush Tax Cuts raised the deficit, so your "historical fact" is anything but.
This isnít even a complete sentence. Revenues actually increase when you reduce the tax rates on the upper incomes, thatís a historical fact.
I donít need one, he said heíd eliminate whatever loopholes it takes to be deficit neutral; so he may need to eliminate that one he may not. You simply said such loopholes didnít even exist, and I proved you were full of it.
Second, I initially stated that there aren't any loopholes that will offset the tax rate decreases that he wants to put in place. It's cute that you can google tax loopholes and then cut and paste. But the example you gave wouldn't even put a dent into the amount it would take to offset the revenue loss from his new rates. I believe I asked you to provide a loophole and then provide me a source stating he'd get rid of that loophole. You might have caught that if you didn't cut my posts into 1 sentence quotes. Is it so hard to keep my 3 to 4 sentences in one quote?
Weren't republicans the ones complaining about the whole "we have to pass the bill so we can see whats in it." Yet, when it comes to Mitt Romney's tax plan, they're perfectly fine with absolutely no details until he gets elected.