Welcome to FinHeaven Fans Forums! We're glad to have you here. Please feel free to browse the forum. We'd like to invite you to join our community; doing so will enable you to view additional forums and post with our other members.



VIP Members don't see these ads. Join VIP Now
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 11

Thread: 7,000 Millionaires Paid Zero Taxes Last Year

Hybrid View

  1. -1
    rob19's Avatar
    Soul Rebel

    Status:
    Offline
    WPA:
    Join date:
    Mar 2006
    Posts:
    7,077
    vCash:
    5755
    Loc:
    Georgia
    Thanks / No Thanks
    1972 Dolphins Logo

    7,000 Millionaires Paid Zero Taxes Last Year

    Let's focus on these 7,000 tax payers. I think they help to show why, even if the Buffett Rule is a sensible principle, it wouldn't be a commonsense law.

    As Roberton Williams of the Tax Policy Center explained to me, there are three buckets of factors that can bring taxable income down from $1 million to zero. One is tax tricks. The IRS should crack down more. Two is relying heavily on investments. The administration can try to level taxes for earned income and investment income. Third is great misfortunes. When investments lose significant income, a house or business is destroyed (i.e. a casualty loss), or a family member gets sick and incurs high medical costs for the self-insured, all these things chop away at taxable income and eventually bring a millionaire's income taxes to zero.

    "You can attribute some of those 7,000 non-tax payers to investment choices they made, like tax exempt bonds," Williams told me, "but a lot of this might be unfortunate happenstance. A tornado tore through your home, you got a very expensive form of cancer, you lost hundreds of thousands of dollars in an investment. Those aren't choices people made, they're just legal deductions under the law."

    The fact that 7,000 millionaires didn't pay income tax in 2011 is a Rorschach test for the Buffett Rule. Are you outraged by the figure? Then you probably think the rule should be enshrined into law. But if you see the figure as an artifact of a complicated tax code doing its best to account for a varied and complicated country of 150 million tax units, you might not be so outraged. We can, and we should, raise taxes on millions of more Americans, and we should start with the rich, because they can afford to pay sooner. But it's best to see the Buffett Rule as a political tool designed to drive a wedge between the White House and Republicans who have written off tax increases forever.
    http://www.theatlantic.com/business/...-2011/245469/#
    Quote Quote  

  2. -2
    Valandui's Avatar
    The Fluke

    Status:
    Offline
    WPA:
    Join date:
    May 2008
    Posts:
    9,478
    vCash:
    11123
    Loc:
    Lakeland, FL
    Thanks / No Thanks
    The super-rich don't pay taxes. That's how it works. When they talk about taxing the rich more they're referring to the middle class.

    Valandui's Weekly Music Video

    Conducting From the Grave: The Rise
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RYQ2aKgXafw
    Quote Quote  

  3. -3
    MoFinz's Avatar
    Uwe Von Schamann's Bastard Son

    Status:
    Offline
    WPA:
    Join date:
    May 2002
    Posts:
    3,052
    vCash:
    1016
    Thanks / No Thanks
    "According to the annual World Wealth Report from Merill Lynch and Capgemini, the U.S. had 3.1 million millionaires in 2010, up from 2.86 million in 2009. The latest figure tops the pre-crisis peak of three million."


    http://http://blogs.wsj.com/wealth/2...-millionaires/


    7k out of 3.1 million? Isn't it more likely these would be examples of the 3rd scenario?


    Fat, drunk and stupid is no way to go through life
    Quote Quote  

  4. -4
    Valandui's Avatar
    The Fluke

    Status:
    Offline
    WPA:
    Join date:
    May 2008
    Posts:
    9,478
    vCash:
    11123
    Loc:
    Lakeland, FL
    Thanks / No Thanks
    Quote Originally Posted by MoFinz View Post
    "According to the annual World Wealth Report from Merill Lynch and Capgemini, the U.S. had 3.1 million millionaires in 2010, up from 2.86 million in 2009. The latest figure tops the pre-crisis peak of three million."


    http://http://blogs.wsj.com/wealth/2...-millionaires/


    7k out of 3.1 million? Isn't it more likely these would be examples of the 3rd scenario?
    That also lumps someone who has one or two million dollars and maybe owns their own business and files the business' taxes individually with the likes of Jay Rockefeller.
    Quote Quote  

  5. -5
    MoFinz's Avatar
    Uwe Von Schamann's Bastard Son

    Status:
    Offline
    WPA:
    Join date:
    May 2002
    Posts:
    3,052
    vCash:
    1016
    Thanks / No Thanks
    Kind of hard to think youre going to get more money from a shrinking source doesnt it?

    But then again its more about class warfare than any attempt to correct the fiscal problems isnt it?

    http://http://money.cnn.com/2012/06/...ires/index.htm
    Quote Quote  

  6. -6
    Dolphins9954's Avatar
    Pro Bowler

    Status:
    Online
    WPA:
    Join date:
    Apr 2005
    Posts:
    10,029
    vCash:
    6256
    Thanks / No Thanks
    [youtube]FC5Gkox-1QY[/youtube]

    I agree these 7,000 are getting a sweetheart deal. But guess who's giving it to them?? In the end even if we taxed those 7,000 and raised taxes on all the rich, we still fall WAY short on balancing the budget. The taxes debate is a smokescreen and distraction from what's really the problem. The government sucks with our money.





    "Politics is the Art of Looking for Trouble, Finding it Everywhere, Diagnosing it Incorrectly, and Applying the Wrong Remedies"
    Quote Quote  

  7. -7
    phins_4_ever's Avatar
    Perennial All-Pro

    Status:
    Offline
    WPA:
    Join date:
    Oct 2008
    Posts:
    3,494
    vCash:
    7086
    Thanks / No Thanks
    Quote Originally Posted by Dolphins9954 View Post
    [youtube]FC5Gkox-1QY[/youtube]

    I agree these 7,000 are getting a sweetheart deal. But guess who's giving it to them?? In the end even if we taxed those 7,000 and raised taxes on all the rich, we still fall WAY short on balancing the budget. The taxes debate is a smokescreen and distraction from what's really the problem. The government sucks with our money.
    See the point is not just taxing the rich and the budget deficit is solved. The proposal last year from the WH was simply increasing revenue and cutting line items. YOU CAN NOT FIX THE BUDGET DEFICIT ON CUTS ALONE OR ON REVENUE ALONE!!!!!

    It is simple math......

    Secondly, this country is the ONLY country where you pay less taxes the more money you make. It has nothing to do with the country of the free but with using the country of the free. The irony is to use all the loopholes available the upper level in society is using every government loophole, the very same government they are bitching about.

    Here is my first solution: cut the outsourcing loophole to other countries. Implement an additional tax to companies who are using overseas sweatshops and overseas low wages to make more profit. Tax incentives to those companies who hire US employees. That way you are forcing companies to hire US employees which would lower unemployment rate, unemployment compensation and possible wellfare benefits. Cut the defense budget asap. Revamp the tax code so that capital gains are in a regular tax code range, not the lousy 15% or what it is now.

    My next solution is to go after guys like Romney who are using "overseas investments' as a personal piggy bank. Pretax every dollar going out of the country.

    Then you cut the defense budget. Reduce or eliminate our foreign involvements. It is time to let the world determine their own faith. Our time as policeman of the global well being is done. Times have changed. There is no USSR military force you have to compete with. No more unnecessary foreign wars, drone operations, covered operations etc. Done and over with.

    That is just a start.....

    Politically I would ban lobbyists from Washington DC. No more of this crap where a politician is in the pockets of a certain industry. All politicians are banned from owning stocks or any publicly traded or privately held stocks. You want to own stocks? Go work in the private environment. If you are in politics you serve us first and foremost and all possibilities for a conflict of interest should be eliminated.

    Oh geez...I could go on....

    How about we stop printing dollar bills as we need them and establish the Gold Standard?

    I think I will run for office.
    Quote Quote  

  8. -8
    Spesh's Avatar
    Fat Kid

    Status:
    Online
    WPA:
    Join date:
    Apr 2007
    Posts:
    7,582
    vCash:
    1419
    Thanks / No Thanks
    Thing thats so depressing about this is the 7k Millionaires who dont pay taxes will whine and moan about the "moochers" of society.
    "I'm not here to be a distraction," Pouncey said.
    http://espn.go.com/nfl/story/_/id/10...ogical-testing
    Quote Quote  

  9. -9
    Dogbone34's Avatar
    cowboy surfer

    Status:
    Offline
    WPA:
    Join date:
    Apr 2007
    Posts:
    2,695
    vCash:
    2089
    Loc:
    Los Angeles
    Thanks / No Thanks
    We pay enough taxes. Too many hands in the public cookie jar.

    Government can not control spending. The Fed is our dealer.

    More taxes on anyone is a loser strategy that plays right into the status quo.
    Quote Quote  

  10. -10
    MoFinz's Avatar
    Uwe Von Schamann's Bastard Son

    Status:
    Offline
    WPA:
    Join date:
    May 2002
    Posts:
    3,052
    vCash:
    1016
    Thanks / No Thanks
    Does anyone actually read the links besides me?

    7k out of 3.1 million .....think maybe they could have been the ones that actually lost money that year, therefore they had no INcome to tax? I dont know each of their stories, but the examples i see here of enmity towards anyone that has a certain amount of money is discouraging.
    Quote Quote  

Similar Threads

  1. Seantor Harry Reid:" Mitt, prove that you paid taxes!"
    By BAMAPHIN 22 in forum Political | War Forum
    Replies: 43
    Last Post: 08-10-2012, 02:52 AM
  2. Five Major Taxes from the ACA that take Affect Next Year
    By LouPhinFan in forum Political | War Forum
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 07-06-2012, 05:50 PM
  3. Replies: 40
    Last Post: 09-09-2008, 09:25 PM
  4. Hypocrite Alert: John Kerry paid less taxes than MOST of us!!!
    By Section126 in forum Political | War Forum
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 09-15-2004, 04:14 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •