So what you are saying is "no doctor would sit and watch someone die, when he could kill someone else to possibily save the first" ?? WOW!!!
Again show me more than one situation out of 100,000 cases where this is the issue. Show me the cases where a doctor says, "you are going to die unless we kill your child". With C-sections and all the other options that doctors have today there just are never these situations. I mean show me a mother that if they said there is a 80% you die if we don't kill your child that wouldn't take the chance!!! This isn't even a realistic arguement, please stop with this nonesense. You lose all credibility.
Last edited by KTOWNFINFAN; 10-22-2012 at 11:56 PM.
Im not a fan of abortion as birth control really, but I think its the height of hypocrisy to call abortion to save a woman's life murder, but ignore the fact that such a law would directly lead to women dying. I wont even get into how laughably silly it is to be pro-life and for the death penalty.
Just start with the fact that life is life and one is not more important than the other and you will be able to figure the rest out.
There are between 67,000 and 167,000 ectopic pregnancies in this country EACH YEAR. That's a lot of mothers -- some of which already have children who need them -- you want to kill, buddy. Congrats.
But abortions are "never necessary" because modern technology has "eliminated the risks of childbirth."
He lied. If he wants to oppose abortion based on his religious beliefs, fine, that's his right and I can respect that, even though I wholeheartedly disagree. But to flat out lie and to have the audacity to try and use science to defend his position...