I felt Moore and really that Pat Devlin should have been the starter, but by that unwritten rule, I felt Moore earned the job last year, so he should have been the starter by default.

I just don't understand how we draft a rookie wide/receiver QB and somehow pressure him to be our savior and learn on the job.

I was satisfied Moore's performance last year.

Had Moore started and we lost, then I feel it promotes Tannehills success.

If we win, well we want to make sure Tannehill gets well.

In other words, the Dolphins had every excuse to start Moore and save face.

Now we have a QB controversy as someone predicted earlier in week.

d-1