Welcome to FinHeaven Fans Forums! We're glad to have you here. Please feel free to browse the forum. We'd like to invite you to join our community; doing so will enable you to view additional forums and post with our other members.



VIP Members don't see these ads. Join VIP Now
Page 2 of 11 FirstFirst 1234567 ... LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 101

Thread: We want more Moore, Tannehill can learn how to be a NFL QB from the bench

  1. -11
    Waterlogged

    Status:
    Offline
    WPA:
    Join date:
    Oct 2008
    Posts:
    1,775
    vCash:
    1570
    Thanks / No Thanks
    I felt Moore and really that Pat Devlin should have been the starter, but by that unwritten rule, I felt Moore earned the job last year, so he should have been the starter by default.

    I just don't understand how we draft a rookie wide/receiver QB and somehow pressure him to be our savior and learn on the job.

    I was satisfied Moore's performance last year.

    Had Moore started and we lost, then I feel it promotes Tannehills success.

    If we win, well we want to make sure Tannehill gets well.

    In other words, the Dolphins had every excuse to start Moore and save face.

    Now we have a QB controversy as someone predicted earlier in week.

    d-1
    Quote Quote  

  2. -12
    Tiko377's Avatar
    Pro Bowler

    Status:
    Offline
    WPA:
    Join date:
    Aug 2009
    Posts:
    1,860
    vCash:
    2732
    Loc:
    Southern California
    Thanks / No Thanks
    Quote Originally Posted by FinFanAlex View Post
    Moore is 1-0 Tannehill is 3-4 and simply does not have the experience or the skill to win the close games.
    Tannehill is 4-4 he started last game
    Moore is 0-0
    Last edited by NY8123; 11-05-2012 at 04:16 PM. Reason: Personal Attack Removed
    Miami Dolphins, Miami Heat , Virginia Tech

    Xbox Live : Tiko7523
    Psn : Tiko7523
    Quote Quote  

  3. -13
    beanh8er's Avatar
    Pro Bowler

    Status:
    Online
    WPA:
    Join date:
    Oct 2010
    Posts:
    2,297
    vCash:
    2398
    Thanks / No Thanks
    Quote Originally Posted by dolphans1 View Post
    I felt Moore and really that Pat Devlin should have been the starter, but by that unwritten rule, I felt Moore earned the job last year, so he should have been the starter by default.

    I just don't understand how we draft a rookie wide/receiver QB and somehow pressure him to be our savior and learn on the job.

    I was satisfied Moore's performance last year.

    Had Moore started and we lost, then I feel it promotes Tannehills success.

    If we win, well we want to make sure Tannehill gets well.

    In other words, the Dolphins had every excuse to start Moore and save face.

    Now we have a QB controversy as someone predicted earlier in week.

    d-1
    There is no quarterback controversy. What ****ing planet are you living on where there is a QB controversy?
    Quote Quote  

  4. -14
    uk_dolfan's Avatar
    FinHeaven VIP

    Status:
    Offline
    WPA:
    Join date:
    Sep 2012
    Posts:
    7,158
    vCash:
    16663
    Loc:
    Northern Ireland, UK
    Thanks / No Thanks
    Galactic Empire medalManchester United FCPS4 ControllerCam Wake 912013 Dolphins Logo
    pathetic

    Quote Originally Posted by dolphans1 View Post
    I felt Moore and really that Pat Devlin should have been the starter, but by that unwritten rule, I felt Moore earned the job last year, so he should have been the starter by default.

    I just don't understand how we draft a rookie wide/receiver QB and somehow pressure him to be our savior and learn on the job.

    I was satisfied Moore's performance last year.

    Had Moore started and we lost, then I feel it promotes Tannehills success.

    If we win, well we want to make sure Tannehill gets well.

    In other words, the Dolphins had every excuse to start Moore and save face.

    Now we have a QB controversy as someone predicted earlier in week.

    d-1


    Quote Quote  

  5. -15
    FinsFanforlife1's Avatar
    Rookie

    Status:
    Offline
    WPA:
    Join date:
    Dec 2008
    Posts:
    50
    vCash:
    2144
    Loc:
    Pennsylvania
    Thanks / No Thanks
    Really your putting this in tannehill???? Some people are morons. Did you even see the game?
    Quote Quote  

  6. -16
    JERSEYFINFAN23's Avatar
    Starter

    Status:
    Offline
    WPA:
    Join date:
    Aug 2005
    Posts:
    981
    vCash:
    1691
    Thanks / No Thanks
    need too change the red color on the back round very hard too read the post -
    Moore is a journeyman back up -- he is gone at seasons end =
    Quote Quote  

  7. -17
    DannyBoy13's Avatar
    Scout Team

    Status:
    Offline
    WPA:
    Join date:
    Apr 2005
    Posts:
    103
    vCash:
    348
    Loc:
    West Palm Beach, Fl
    Thanks / No Thanks
    Quote Originally Posted by FinFanAlex View Post
    Moore is 1-0 Tannehill is 3-4 and simply does not have the experience or the skill to win the close games.
    congratulations you officially have **** for brains.
    Quote Quote  

  8. -18
    Rookie

    Status:
    Offline
    WPA:
    Join date:
    Jan 2008
    Posts:
    804
    vCash:
    1664
    Thanks / No Thanks
    Quote Originally Posted by FinFanAlex View Post
    Moore is 1-0 Tannehill is 3-4 and simply does not have the experience or the skill to win the close games.
    **** off
    Quote Quote  

  9. -19
    DolfanDuBbZ~'s Avatar
    Avoid the 'Noid

    Status:
    Offline
    WPA:
    Join date:
    Nov 2008
    Posts:
    5,591
    vCash:
    4447
    Thanks / No Thanks
    Quote Originally Posted by dolphans1 View Post
    I felt Moore and really that Pat Devlin should have been the starter, but by that unwritten rule, I felt Moore earned the job last year, so he should have been the starter by default.

    I just don't understand how we draft a rookie wide/receiver QB and somehow pressure him to be our savior and learn on the job.

    I was satisfied Moore's performance last year.

    Had Moore started and we lost, then I feel it promotes Tannehills success.

    If we win, well we want to make sure Tannehill gets well.

    In other words, the Dolphins had every excuse to start Moore and save face.

    Now we have a QB controversy as someone predicted earlier in week.

    d-1
    If you seriously think there is a QB controversy, your on cloud 9. Tannehill was drafted and given the keys to the car. Period.

    Now, why would MIA start Tannehill year 1? Because since 2008, if you are drafted in the first round as a QB...YOU START. Period. Teams no longer have the luxury to sit and wait. MIA and the new HC staff knew they were hitched to Tannehill. You find out in 2012 what you have, not in 2014. You let your QB learn on the job. Not on the bench.
    Quote Quote  

  10. -20
    Waterlogged

    Status:
    Offline
    WPA:
    Join date:
    Oct 2008
    Posts:
    1,775
    vCash:
    1570
    Thanks / No Thanks
    Go watch the Jets game again and you may understand where I am coming from.

    We had several opportunities to put this game away today and Tannehills couldn't do it.

    I feel Matt Moore gives us the best chance to win, but you know, it doesn't really matter anyway.

    I fell into the trap in thinking we could make the playoffs and what I saw today is not a playoff team.

    My instincts tell me Tannehill is not the answer as a franchise QB.

    I hope I'm wrong, but time will only tell.

    Too many horrible throws by Tannehill when we really needed it.

    d-1


    Quote Originally Posted by beanh8er View Post
    There is no quarterback controversy. What ****ing planet are you living on where there is a QB controversy?
    Quote Quote  

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 12
    Last Post: 11-12-2012, 08:30 AM
  2. Replies: 97
    Last Post: 11-05-2012, 04:09 PM
  3. Bench tannehill!!!!!!
    By KTOWNFINFAN in forum Miami Dolphins Forum
    Replies: 18
    Last Post: 09-17-2012, 10:30 AM
  4. All of those who said to bench tannehill please sit the hell down
    By TakeoSpikesNeck in forum Miami Dolphins Forum
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 09-16-2012, 04:24 PM
  5. Learn to love Matt Moore
    By LikeUntoGod in forum Miami Dolphins Forum
    Replies: 33
    Last Post: 03-19-2012, 10:30 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •