Welcome to FinHeaven Fans Forums! We're glad to have you here. Please feel free to browse the forum. We'd like to invite you to join our community; doing so will enable you to view additional forums and post with our other members.



VIP Members don't see these ads. Join VIP Now
Page 9 of 10 FirstFirst ... 45678910 LastLast
Results 81 to 90 of 100

Thread: Is Luck vs. Tannehill the next Brady vs. Manning?

  1. -81
    DolfanISS's Avatar
    Perennial All-Pro

    Status:
    Offline
    WPA:
    Join date:
    Aug 2002
    Posts:
    7,870
    vCash:
    8156
    Loc:
    Bellingham, MA
    Thanks / No Thanks

    Is Luck vs. Tannehill the next Brady vs. Manning?

    Quote Originally Posted by PATSSUCK View Post
    If you say he has work to do to be a Franchise QB, I absolutely agree with that. The problem I have is the freaken morons that say things like " bring Henne back" and call him "Hennehill". It shows a total lack of knowledge.
    Agreed, Chad Henne is terrible and there is still a handful of Dolfans who can't admit Moore is much better than him let alone Tannehill. I have a problem with the guys who are already 100% certain Tanny is already a franchise QB, and anything that goes wrong is not his fault.

    Whoa that sounds like I think Moore is better than Tannehill, I do not. I was saying Tannehill and Moore are better than Henne.
    The way Jeff Ireland took a GM's dream worth of cap space and draft picks and made the team worse in borderline miraculous.
    Quote Quote  

  2. -82
    Perennial All-Pro

    Status:
    Offline
    WPA:
    Join date:
    Mar 2004
    Posts:
    2,576
    vCash:
    1000
    Loc:
    Miami
    Thanks / No Thanks
    Quote Originally Posted by DolfanISS View Post
    Agreed, Chad Henne is terrible and there is still a handful of Dolfans who can't admit Moore is much better than him let alone Tannehill. I have a problem with the guys who are already 100% certain Tanny is already a franchise QB, and anything that goes wrong is not his fault.

    Whoa that sounds like I think Moore is better than Tannehill, I do not. I was saying Tannehill and Moore are better than Henne.
    I agree. I try to be level headed about him. When he was doing well, I would tell people " dont get over excited he is still a rookie". He had a BAD game from start to finish. The first pick was not his fault, but the next two were. It happens QBs throw picks. I dont understand why people when crazy like that, it was his first real bad game since his first game. He has thrown 6 out of his 9 picks in two games.

    Oh Andrew Luck is better... No **** I agree. Luck is a freaken beast. Tannehill may be great one day, but he is not Luck. Having said that,, if our corners werent allegric to catching the ****en ball, we would have picked him off 2 or 3 times.
    Quote Quote  

  3. -83
    DolfanISS's Avatar
    Perennial All-Pro

    Status:
    Offline
    WPA:
    Join date:
    Aug 2002
    Posts:
    7,870
    vCash:
    8156
    Loc:
    Bellingham, MA
    Thanks / No Thanks

    Is Luck vs. Tannehill the next Brady vs. Manning?

    Quote Originally Posted by PATSSUCK View Post
    I agree. I try to be level headed about him. When he was doing well, I would tell people " dont get over excited he is still a rookie". He had a BAD game from start to finish. The first pick was not his fault, but the next two were. It happens QBs throw picks. I dont understand why people when crazy like that, it was his first real bad game since his first game. He has thrown 6 out of his 9 picks in two games.

    Oh Andrew Luck is better... No **** I agree. Luck is a freaken beast. Tannehill may be great one day, but he is not Luck. Having said that,, if our corners werent allegric to catching the ****en ball, we would have picked him off 2 or 3 times.
    Exactly, Luck looks like a beast but he surely straddled that hero/goat line vs Miami more than the media lets off.
    Quote Quote  

  4. -84
    enigmatics's Avatar
    Go get me a juice box!

    Status:
    Offline
    WPA:
    Join date:
    Mar 2004
    Posts:
    6,296
    vCash:
    5978
    Loc:
    Arizona
    Thanks / No Thanks
    Quote Originally Posted by DolfanISS View Post
    This place is something else. I've not read all of Junc's Tannehill posts but I have not once seen him say he sucks or will never be our franchise QB. In fact the most negative thing he has said is the jury is still out. He said it when Tanny was playing well and has remained consistent after the horrible game he had Sunday. This place needs to lighten up, I had my buddies at work (a Jets fan and Pats fan) llaughing today about how sensitive the board is about Tannehill. It's really ridiculous!
    Amen. They're an embarrassment.
    Quote Quote  

  5. -85
    Perennial All-Pro

    Status:
    Offline
    WPA:
    Join date:
    Mar 2004
    Posts:
    2,576
    vCash:
    1000
    Loc:
    Miami
    Thanks / No Thanks
    Quote Originally Posted by enigmatics View Post
    Amen.
    Its fine to criticize. Not to call him a bust already.
    Quote Quote  

  6. -86
    tylerdolphin's Avatar
    More Smug than Birthday Dog

    Status:
    Offline
    WPA:
    Join date:
    Sep 2005
    Posts:
    12,286
    vCash:
    3832
    Thanks / No Thanks
    Cam Wake 91
    Quote Originally Posted by nyjunc View Post
    maybe someday you can drag your QB into the playoffs too?
    We have faith that one day Tannehill may be good enough to actually get us in the playoffs without having a top 5 D and running game.

    I do feel bad for the Jests in a weird way though. I know how sad it is to be in the place you guys are.




    Quote Quote  

  7. -87
    nyjunc's Avatar
    Hall Of Famer

    Status:
    Offline
    WPA:
    Join date:
    Mar 2004
    Posts:
    28,232
    vCash:
    21000
    Loc:
    New York
    Thanks / No Thanks
    Blog Entries:
    1
    Quote Originally Posted by finfanaz View Post
    This is why most people can't stand you. Anyone can go to a site, preach the opposite of what everyone else on said site believes and get a reaction out of people. Call that contributing all you want lol...

    I'll also add that when I read that I can't help but picture some petulant child, not calling you a child, just sayin' lol..
    I don't come on here to get reactions, those who I get negative reactions from simply b/c I am a Jet fan are not ones I like to engage in discussions.

    Quote Originally Posted by DolfanISS View Post
    This place is something else. I've not read all of Junc's Tannehill posts but I have not once seen him say he sucks or will never be our franchise QB. In fact the most negative thing he has said is the jury is still out. He said it when Tanny was playing well and has remained consistent after the horrible game he had Sunday. This place needs to lighten up, I had my buddies at work (a Jets fan and Pats fan) llaughing today about how sensitive the board is about Tannehill. It's really ridiculous!
    Thank you, too many folks can't see past me being a Jet fan to actually read what I write. I think I am always fair, sometimes I may not be but it is not my intent. I am impressed by Tannehill but he still has a long way to go, it looks like you have a QB to build around but it also looked like that w/ Henne so you never know. Things change so quickly in this league.

    Quote Originally Posted by tylerdolphin View Post
    We have faith that one day Tannehill may be good enough to actually get us in the playoffs without having a top 5 D and running game.

    I do feel bad for the Jests in a weird way though. I know how sad it is to be in the place you guys are.
    we didn't have a top 5 D or run game in 2010. we were 6th in points allowed and while our run game was 4th in rush yds that # was skewed by Brad Smith trick plays and a garbage time game in week 17. Our top 2 RBs gave us a similar ground game to what you guys had in 2010 and our run game was medicore for most of the year as our QB bailed us out week after week.
    Quote Quote  

  8. -88
    tylerdolphin's Avatar
    More Smug than Birthday Dog

    Status:
    Offline
    WPA:
    Join date:
    Sep 2005
    Posts:
    12,286
    vCash:
    3832
    Thanks / No Thanks
    Cam Wake 91
    Right because no other team had rushing yards n garbage time or trick plays.
    Quote Quote  

  9. -89
    Canadianfishfan's Avatar
    FinHeavean VIP

    Status:
    Offline
    WPA:
    Join date:
    Aug 2004
    Posts:
    12,451
    vCash:
    7816
    Loc:
    Toronto, On. Canada
    Thanks / No Thanks
    They'll be linked regardless. Let's hope this franchise builds as fast as the Colts, or this rivalry will be a joke.
    Quote Quote  

  10. -90
    nyjunc's Avatar
    Hall Of Famer

    Status:
    Offline
    WPA:
    Join date:
    Mar 2004
    Posts:
    28,232
    vCash:
    21000
    Loc:
    New York
    Thanks / No Thanks
    Blog Entries:
    1
    Quote Originally Posted by tylerdolphin View Post
    Right because no other team had rushing yards n garbage time or trick plays.
    our top 2 guys who got the bulk of the carries in our ground game avreaged 4.1 YPC- good but far from great and LT who was our lead back was great the first month and bad the rest of the year.
    Quote Quote  

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 14
    Last Post: 01-04-2013, 04:36 PM
  2. Replies: 7
    Last Post: 12-16-2012, 07:17 PM
  3. Pouncey: Tannehill is better than Luck and RG3, more like Brady
    By foozool13 in forum Miami Dolphins Forum
    Replies: 78
    Last Post: 11-06-2012, 01:38 PM
  4. No Luck, But How About Manning?
    By Blitz in forum Miami Dolphins Forum
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 12-04-2011, 08:46 PM
  5. Cowherd talks Manning, Luck, Phins, suck for luck
    By phinatic1399 in forum Miami Dolphins Forum
    Replies: 19
    Last Post: 10-06-2011, 03:51 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •