Nice logical non-sequitur, simply because something doesnít interest me much doesnít mean I am not knowledgeable in that field. The fact is I did use that term correctly, the fact is that you didnít know the basic biological qualifications for life, and the fact is you were trying to take the discussion down rabbit holes because you couldnít defend your position.
The point is not whether you can ďun-dupeĒ women out of believing there is a war on women, the point is that they fell for a false narrative and it got Obama elected. Essentially he won because his campaign lied.
It's interesting to me you don't seem to be able to grasp something so exceedingly simple.
Itís interesting to me that you insist on bringing up points that are logically irrelevant.
FINALLY! Someone else who is at least familiar with how logical reasoning works, an argumentís soundness is in no way measured by its ability to persuade. People are often persuaded by invalid arguments.
Are you really trying to suggest that blacks were in fact not human when a majority of American voters didnít view them as human? Thatís the point we are making, a majority of people believing something does not make that thing true. A majority of women believing abortion is not killing their baby doesnít mean itís not killing their baby, a majority of women thinking the GOP has initiated a war on women doesnít mean the GOP has actually initiated a war on women. A majority of voting single women fell for a total lie by the Obama campaign, thatís all that happened.
You can be a PhD candidate in America and not know itís important to define your terms? Youíre a living testament to the failures of our education system; we can do better than this in America!