Welcome to FinHeaven Fans Forums! We're glad to have you here. Please feel free to browse the forum. We'd like to invite you to join our community; doing so will enable you to view additional forums and post with our other members.



VIP Members don't see these ads. Join VIP Now
Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 25

Thread: Rosenthal:Tannehill wasn't great..But he was far from Miami biggest problem(positive)

  1. -1
    Rhoadsy13's Avatar
    Starter

    Status:
    Offline
    WPA:
    Join date:
    Aug 2004
    Posts:
    564
    vCash:
    4722
    Loc:
    Birmingham, AL
    Thanks / No Thanks

    Player Rosenthal:Tannehill wasn't great..But he was far from Miami biggest problem(positive)

    http://www.nfl.com/news/story/0ap100...gn=Twitter_atl

    Good article. He looks at the game film & analyzed it & he doesn't think he played as bad as his numbers looked. I'm a big believer in Tannehill & although he didn't play great it's part of the game & he will get better.
    I can do all things through Christ who strengthens me. Phillipians 4:13
    Quote Quote  

  2. -2
    DolfanISS's Avatar
    Perennial All-Pro

    Status:
    Offline
    WPA:
    Join date:
    Aug 2002
    Posts:
    8,509
    vCash:
    3858
    Loc:
    Bellingham, MA
    Thanks / No Thanks
    "He saw blitzes coming and went to his second read".

    Wasn't there a thread earlier this week that stated the Titans never blitzed once throughout the whole game? How did Ryan see them coming?

    Overall though good article.
    Quote Quote  

  3. -3
    J. David Wannyheimer's Avatar
    The truth is out there.

    Status:
    Offline
    WPA:
    Join date:
    Sep 2011
    Posts:
    16,866
    vCash:
    127325
    Thanks / No Thanks
    1972 Dolphins Logo
    Quote Originally Posted by DolfanISS View Post
    "He saw blitzes coming and went to his second read".

    Wasn't there a thread earlier this week that stated the Titans never blitzed once throughout the whole game? How did Ryan see them coming?

    Overall though good article.
    No, they did blitz a few times. Just not very much.
    God bless, I'll hang up and listen.
    Quote Quote  

  4. -4
    enigmatics's Avatar
    Go get me a juice box!

    Status:
    Offline
    WPA:
    Join date:
    Mar 2004
    Posts:
    6,775
    vCash:
    9358
    Loc:
    Arizona
    Thanks / No Thanks
    Quote Originally Posted by registeredguy View Post
    No, they did blitz a few times. Just not very much.
    They blitzed only 10 times in 40 pass attempts.
    Quote Quote  

  5. -5
    J. David Wannyheimer's Avatar
    The truth is out there.

    Status:
    Offline
    WPA:
    Join date:
    Sep 2011
    Posts:
    16,866
    vCash:
    127325
    Thanks / No Thanks
    1972 Dolphins Logo
    Quote Originally Posted by enigmatics View Post
    They blitzed only 10 times in 40 pass attempts.
    Correct. It might have seemed like more, but only because the offensive line was playing like jello.
    Quote Quote  

  6. -6
    SR 7's Avatar
    Waterlogged

    Status:
    Offline
    WPA:
    Join date:
    Feb 2006
    Posts:
    8,755
    vCash:
    1184
    Thanks / No Thanks
    they didn't blitz becasue they knew if they gave tannehill time with more coverage those WR would not be able to break free and it would end up in forced throws.

    If i know a team has 2 recievers with 1 useless TE i'd keep everone in coverage and wait until the QB forces things. Not sure hwy it took teams 8 games to figure that one out but hey, it also took teams 17 games to figure out how easy it was to defend pennington, just defend the middle and make him go outside wiht his lack of arm strength.
    Quote Quote  

  7. -7
    enigmatics's Avatar
    Go get me a juice box!

    Status:
    Offline
    WPA:
    Join date:
    Mar 2004
    Posts:
    6,775
    vCash:
    9358
    Loc:
    Arizona
    Thanks / No Thanks
    Quote Originally Posted by SR 7 View Post
    they didn't blitz becasue they knew if they gave tannehill time with more coverage those WR would not be able to break free and it would end up in forced throws.
    How do you know it's not also partially that Tanny can't yet beat the kind of coverage they thru at him?
    Quote Quote  

  8. -8
    Despacio's Avatar
    Pro Bowler

    Status:
    Offline
    WPA:
    Join date:
    Jun 2004
    Posts:
    4,597
    vCash:
    13401
    Loc:
    Arizona
    Thanks / No Thanks

    Rosenthal:Tannehill wasn't great..But he was far from Miami biggest problem(positive)

    Asking a lot of a rookie to throw to a WR corp that can't get open. How we didn't upgrade in the offseason is mind boggling. All on Ireland here.


    Marino.... Huard, Feidler, Lucas, Griese, Rosenfels, Feeley, Frerrote, Green, Culpepper, Harrington, Lemon, Beck, Thigpen, Pennington, Henne, Moore... Tannehill.

    'Bout damn time!
    Quote Quote  

  9. -9
    chrispepper's Avatar
    Seasoned Veteran

    Status:
    Offline
    WPA:
    Join date:
    Mar 2010
    Posts:
    504
    vCash:
    1124
    Thanks / No Thanks
    I dont mind positivity but Ryan cost us this game.. More than half their points came off turnovers, you take them away and were definitley still in the game. I don't remember the titans doing too much on offence either so cant be too critical of the defence.. we execute better and we win that game.
    Quote Quote  

  10. -10
    joerobbie's Avatar
    FishAttack

    Status:
    Offline
    WPA:
    Join date:
    Feb 2005
    Posts:
    53
    vCash:
    1232
    Thanks / No Thanks
    1972 Dolphins LogoTannehill 17
    you did not read the article or?
    i got the feeling that most of the posters here should watch the CFL,no clue at all.
    Quote Quote  

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 23
    Last Post: 10-10-2012, 04:37 PM
  2. Replies: 8
    Last Post: 10-16-2011, 11:05 AM
  3. Replies: 44
    Last Post: 09-16-2011, 02:09 AM
  4. Miami's biggest problem on defense: LBs
    By dfin54 in forum Miami Dolphins Forum
    Replies: 33
    Last Post: 12-28-2009, 05:23 PM
  5. Biggest Problem on OL
    By Jaj in forum Miami Dolphins Forum
    Replies: 21
    Last Post: 01-06-2005, 06:18 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •