Welcome to FinHeaven Fans Forums! We're glad to have you here. Please feel free to browse the forum. We'd like to invite you to join our community; doing so will enable you to view additional forums and post with our other members.



VIP Members don't see these ads. Join VIP Now
Page 2 of 11 FirstFirst 1234567 ... LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 102

Thread: Tannehill is not a winner, folks!!!

  1. -11
    Pro Bowler

    Status:
    Offline
    WPA:
    Join date:
    Aug 2005
    Posts:
    1,610
    vCash:
    9673
    Thanks / No Thanks
    Ryan Tannehill had not one but TWO chances to win this game in the last 4 mins and he FAILED. Enough said.
    Quote Quote  

  2. -12
    FinHeaven Elite

    Status:
    Offline
    WPA:
    Join date:
    Jan 2006
    Posts:
    10,202
    vCash:
    1750
    Loc:
    Miami, FL
    Thanks / No Thanks
    How many National Championships did Brady, Brees, Peyton and Aaron Rodgers win again?
    Quote Quote  

  3. -13
    Flip Tanneflop's Avatar
    Two Little Debbies and a cup of coffee

    Status:
    Offline
    WPA:
    Join date:
    Aug 2005
    Posts:
    15,226
    vCash:
    15131
    Thanks / No Thanks
    Mike Wallace 112013 Dolphins Logo
    Quote Originally Posted by EvilDylan View Post
    so you couldn't just throw this in with the other tannehenne threads? your idea is so new and original that it needed it's very own thread?
    Just when you think the OPs threads cant get any worse, somehow they get worse by the day.
    Quote Quote  

  4. -14
    Flip Tanneflop's Avatar
    Two Little Debbies and a cup of coffee

    Status:
    Offline
    WPA:
    Join date:
    Aug 2005
    Posts:
    15,226
    vCash:
    15131
    Thanks / No Thanks
    Mike Wallace 112013 Dolphins Logo
    Quote Originally Posted by TakeoSpikesNeck View Post
    no the biggest knock was he was a W.R all his career except 1 year. And hes dumb as a lump as far as not following NFL divisions.
    Quote Originally Posted by TakeoSpikesNeck View Post
    Kids a rookie. We were never supposed to do anything this year with the players we have and him being a rookie. We have no Wallace of the steelers to stretch zones. Every team plays under becasue we throw under hence no deep threats. We have good complimentary recievers to a deep threat number 1 yeah. Also Rookie QBS always suck 99% of time (look at sanchez he went as rookie to east championship and now he sucks) this year means absolutely nothing. We still have sporanos guys. Give philbin some drafts to fix his defense and get his guys in. Tannehill needs all xp points at this point so next year he isint shaken up by any new looks or 2 min offense to win game. So stop hating on the kid. This team will look 80% dif next year with all of philbins guys and sporanos OUT!

    ---------- Post added at 11:43 PM ---------- Previous post was at 11:41 PM ----------

    Get out you haters warning get out you haters warning get out you haters
    http://www.finheaven.com/show...e-STFU-or-GTFO!

    Which psychological disorder is this? These 2 posts are 1 day apart.
    Quote Quote  

  5. -15
    ojmcduffy's Avatar
    Seasoned Veteran

    Status:
    Offline
    WPA:
    Join date:
    Nov 2004
    Posts:
    2,991
    vCash:
    2008
    Thanks / No Thanks
    Tannehill is not a winner in what golf. It was my understanding that football was a team sport. Going by that ideology the dolphins are not a winner. The dolphins are the sum of their parts and tannehill is only 1/53 of those parts.
    Quote Quote  

  6. -16
    13marino13's Avatar
    What is the frequency Kenneth

    Status:
    Offline
    WPA:
    Join date:
    Mar 2004
    Posts:
    1,098
    vCash:
    1626
    Loc:
    Out with your Mother
    Thanks / No Thanks
    Quote Originally Posted by fisi View Post
    This was one of the the biggest knock on him coming out of the draft. He didn't win any big games in college so how do you expect him to win one in the NFL.
    I expect him to win one when he has someone to throw the ball to. The Bills were dropping 7-8 into coverage on the last drive, did you really expect Hartline, Bess or Fasano to get open? Hartline and Bess are decent 2-3 receivers AT BEST, but unfortunately they garner no respect from opposing defenses. Until we get a legit #1 to loosen things up, Tannehill will continue to struggle. He has tons of talent, we just need to surround him with talent. He can't do it on his own.
    Quote Quote  

  7. -17
    Scout Team

    Status:
    Offline
    WPA:
    Join date:
    Sep 2011
    Posts:
    29
    vCash:
    1000
    Thanks / No Thanks
    Matt Moore should've started this year. How you were planning on drafting Tannehill and getting rid of a top five receiver in the league and not having a replacement for him is beyond me.
    Quote Quote  

  8. -18
    packfin's Avatar
    Rookie

    Status:
    Online
    WPA:
    Join date:
    Apr 2007
    Posts:
    88
    vCash:
    1168
    Thanks / No Thanks
    Quote Originally Posted by broccoli rob View Post
    well hopefully we can trade for tebow this offseason. He won a few big games in college, so we can expect him to win right?
    great comeback ! Hilarious !
    Quote Quote  

  9. -19
    chrispepper's Avatar
    Seasoned Veteran

    Status:
    Offline
    WPA:
    Join date:
    Mar 2010
    Posts:
    504
    vCash:
    1124
    Thanks / No Thanks

    Tannehill is not a winner, folks!!!

    Quote Originally Posted by 13marino13 View Post
    I expect him to win one when he has someone to throw the ball to. The Bills were dropping 7-8 into coverage on the last drive, did you really expect Hartline, Bess or Fasano to get open? Hartline and Bess are decent 2-3 receivers AT BEST, but unfortunately they garner no respect from opposing defenses. Until we get a legit #1 to loosen things up, Tannehill will continue to struggle. He has tons of talent, we just need to surround him with talent. He can't do it on his own.
    They were dropping 7 or 8 into coverage and we were playing max protect with only two recievers running routes some of the time, doesn't exactly give tannehill much help
    Quote Quote  

  10. -20
    ojmcduffy's Avatar
    Seasoned Veteran

    Status:
    Offline
    WPA:
    Join date:
    Nov 2004
    Posts:
    2,991
    vCash:
    2008
    Thanks / No Thanks
    Quote Originally Posted by Albania View Post
    Matt Moore should've started this year. How you were planning on drafting Tannehill and getting rid of a top five receiver in the league and not having a replacement for him is beyond me.
    so we start moore this year then tannehill goes through the rookie growing pains next year. Matt moore is not the future of this francvhise tannehill is. Matt moore is what he is. A decent stop gap transitional qb. Moore is a great backup but he's just not starting material.
    Quote Quote  

Similar Threads

  1. Hello folks
    By atldolphin1 in forum Introduce Yourself!
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 07-16-2007, 01:03 PM
  2. Only in NY folks, only in NY....
    By Pagan in forum The Lounge
    Replies: 18
    Last Post: 07-25-2003, 02:17 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •