You forgot to include a "none of the above" as a choice.
Hartline has 60 catches for almost 900 yards
Wallace has 52 for around 600 yards
I dont understand the obsession with Wallace around here. Hartline is every bit the player Wallace is. Wallace has more TD's, but Roethlisberger tends to hit Wallace when he gets open deep.
Jennings has barely seen the field this year.
I just dont get why we need one of those 2 guys. Why cant we draft a good receiver? The only receiver we should be worried about signing is Brian Hartline who is better than anyone on the market.
The virtual money spent by not bringing long back will cover Wallace. We have to spend the money somewhere. This would give us the leverage to draft a blitzer with what is shaping up to be a pretty high 1st rounder afterall, draft TE with high 2nd (or even Eifert trade up), and then target someone like Austin or swope in 3rd.
I've seen Austin to the Pats in the first in a few updated mocks.
I'd like to see us sign Wallace and give us some fing speed!
Draft another WR in 2nd or 3rd.
I'd like to see
Stedman Bailey (3rd)
TE (2nd rounder)
After watching the Pitt/ravens game last night, Wallace dropped far too many passes that should have been TD's. If he did that here, he would be labelled the next Marshall. I dunno. I have seen more of wallace than Jennings, but Jennings injuries and age scare me a bit. I think I would prefer, if he is available, the other WR from the Packers James Jones?
I RESPECT EVERYONES POINT OF VIEW & OPINION....REGARDLESS OF HOW WRONG THEY ARE
Would want Wallace but Pittsburgh will not let him go. Jennings seems most likely to hit FA. We can draft a WR in the 2nd or 3rd round.
Neither Wallace nor Bowe are good fits in this offense so I pass on both. I like Jennings who makes an immediate impact because he fits the system perfectly. They also need to draft a guy like Keenan Allen or Stedman Bailey.