Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 26

Thread: Greg Schiano proposed a rule change to eliminate kickoffs.

Hybrid View

  1. -1
    Seasoned Veteran

    Status:
    Offline
    WPA:
    Join date:
    Apr 2010
    Posts:
    561
    vCash:
    775
    Thanks / No Thanks

    WTF Greg Schiano proposed a rule change to eliminate kickoffs.

    This Greg Schiano is a buffoon. He just proposed a rule change that would eliminate kickoffs. Once a team scores, they would get the ball back at their own 30. It would be 4th and 15, and they would have option to either try to get the 1st down, or punt it away to the other team. First the QB kneels, and now this. Can't stand this douche.

    Here is the link if you guys want to read more.
    http://nfl.si.com/2012/12/06/roger-g...-rule-changes/
    Quote Quote  

  2. -2
    Wildbill3's Avatar
    Misery Loves Company

    Status:
    Offline
    WPA:
    Join date:
    Dec 2001
    Posts:
    25,209
    vCash:
    7206
    Loc:
    Kentucky
    Thanks / No Thanks
    Rebel AllianceSuperman logoXbox LogoPlaystation LogoSnakes!
    I don't care for it either. However, we'd probably have a better chance of pinning a team inside the 10 with fields than we do with carpenter.
    "I didn't feel like we had to score," Tannehill said. "I had the mindset we were going to score."

    Quote Quote  

  3. -3
    CaSh's Avatar
    Go Fins!

    Status:
    Offline
    WPA:
    Join date:
    Sep 2008
    Posts:
    657
    vCash:
    152
    Loc:
    SoFlo
    Thanks / No Thanks
    So with this rule 1 team could potentially have the ball the ENTIRE GAME.
    Quote Quote  

  4. -4
    JackFinfan's Avatar
    Seasoned Veteran

    Status:
    Offline
    WPA:
    Join date:
    Aug 2010
    Posts:
    576
    vCash:
    3140
    Thanks / No Thanks
    Quote Originally Posted by CaSh View Post
    So with this rule 1 team could potentially have the ball the ENTIRE GAME.
    technically, you could potentially have the ball the entire game with the current rules in place. Just keep kicking onside kicks and recovering them.
    Quote Quote  

  5. -5
    Dmarino110's Avatar
    Starter

    Status:
    Offline
    WPA:
    Join date:
    Apr 2005
    Posts:
    1,968
    vCash:
    5034
    Thanks / No Thanks
    Greg is not the 1st to propose it...this was on the table last year at the owners meetings, as was eliminating hits on qbs completely...

    like it or not, the NFL is going to start changing more rules to keep the players saferish, and they will not stop until the owners stop making money. but yeah they talked about this, at least paid it lip service last year



    Quote Quote  

  6. -6
    Ferretsquig's Avatar
    Perennial All-Pro

    Status:
    Offline
    WPA:
    Join date:
    Jun 2002
    Posts:
    7,447
    vCash:
    1732
    Loc:
    Carolina
    Thanks / No Thanks
    That drastic of a change isn't all that likely but I could see something coming that will try to put a buffer on the speed at which these guys are coming at one another on kickoffs.
    Quote Quote  

  7. -7
    TheWalrus's Avatar
    1/7/14

    Status:
    Offline
    WPA:
    Join date:
    Dec 2011
    Posts:
    9,966
    vCash:
    44570
    Thanks / No Thanks
    Sure would make punters highly paid.
    Quote Quote  

  8. -8
    Pro Bowler

    Status:
    Offline
    WPA:
    Join date:
    Jun 2004
    Posts:
    7,809
    vCash:
    14592
    Loc:
    Haines City, Fl
    Thanks / No Thanks
    Once "make it, take it" is in place, then we can start playing half court football, which will save on maintenance costs.
    Quote Quote  

  9. -9
    Perennial All-Pro

    Status:
    Offline
    WPA:
    Join date:
    Jun 2010
    Posts:
    2,717
    vCash:
    5107
    Thanks / No Thanks
    Interesting. Not saying I like it, but its interesting to say the least. So if a team is down by 10, they get a TD, instead of hoping for an onside kick, they would just have to convert a 4th and 15 and get a new set of downs.
    Quote Quote  

  10. -10
    roy_miami's Avatar
    Rookies

    Status:
    Offline
    WPA:
    Join date:
    Sep 2008
    Posts:
    7,927
    vCash:
    37808
    Loc:
    Moncton, NB
    Thanks / No Thanks
    Quote Originally Posted by Jamaicankid21 View Post
    Interesting. Not saying I like it, but its interesting to say the least. So if a team is down by 10, they get a TD, instead of hoping for an onside kick, they would just have to convert a 4th and 15 and get a new set of downs.
    This is the part I don't like. The chances of recovering an onside was probably about even throughout the league, with this rule the team that has Tom Brady will have an enormous advantage in recovering the ball after a score over a lot of teams. Remember when we had Pennington? It was basically a guaranteed punt coming up if we had a 3rd and 10.

    A team like the Patriots against a defense like ours could easily come back from 21 down with 4 or 5 minutes left. If they are going to do this I think the ball should still have to come off somebodies foot after a score.
    Quote Quote  

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 4
    Last Post: 04-17-2012, 11:28 PM
  2. Bucs hire Greg Schiano
    By ahmilli in forum General NFL Forum
    Replies: 17
    Last Post: 01-27-2012, 01:15 PM
  3. Bucs hire Greg Schiano
    By ahmilli in forum Miami Dolphins Forum
    Replies: 9
    Last Post: 01-26-2012, 04:24 PM
  4. Clock runoff, umpire change proposed
    By X-Pacolypse in forum College Sports Forum
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 02-12-2011, 03:43 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •