Welcome to FinHeaven Fans Forums! We're glad to have you here. Please feel free to browse the forum. We'd like to invite you to join our community; doing so will enable you to view additional forums and post with our other members.



VIP Members don't see these ads. Join VIP Now
Page 1 of 4 1234 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 32

Thread: Dolphins could be only team in NFL to reach this statistical accomplishment

  1. -1
    Perfect72's Avatar
    It's Only Happened ONCE!

    Status:
    Offline
    WPA:
    Join date:
    May 2004
    Posts:
    494
    vCash:
    7473
    Loc:
    Florida
    Thanks / No Thanks

    Interesting Dolphins could be only team in NFL to reach this statistical accomplishment

    http://www.sun-sentinel.com/sports/m...42,print.story

    Dolphins could be only team in NFL to reach this statistical accomplishment

    But apparently it doesn't equate to regular season success

    By Chris Perkins
    10:21 AM EST, December 24, 2012
    Only one team in the NFL is likely to end the season with a 1,000-yard rusher, a 1,000-yard receiver, a 3,000-yard passer, someone with at least 15 sacks, and two players with 100 tackles apiece.
    It’s the Miami Dolphins.
    All they need is running back Reggie Bush to rush for 60 yards and linebacker Kevin Burnett to get one tackle in the season finale at New England. They’d join wide receiver Brian Hartline (1,014 yards receiving), quarterback Ryan Tannehill (3,059 yards passing), defensive end Cam Wake (15 sacks) and linebacker Karlos Dansby (121 tackles) to complete the list.
    You’d think a team with such glamorous stats would be in the playoffs. Or at least in the playoff hunt. That’s not the case with the Dolphins (7-8). If they lose to the Patriots they’ll end the season with a losing record.
    So do these numbers mean the Dolphins should at least be in the playoff hunt?
    Or are these, in a sense, just numbers?
    Here’s the evidence for the “should be in the playoff hunt” argument:
    --Cincinnati (9-6) is the only other team with a good chance at Miami’s numbers. Defensive tackle Geno Atkins needs two sacks. They’re in the playoffs.
    --San Francisco (10-4-1) has a chance at those numbers, if you give them an asterisk. Wide receiver Michael Crabtree needs 67 yards. But quarterback Alex Smith (1,731 yards passing) has been benched in favor of Colin Kaepernick (1,538 yards passing). Combine the quarterbacks and the 49ers could do it. They’re in the playoffs.
    --Seattle (10-5) won’t get it, but we’ll put them on the list for perspective. Quarterback Russell Wilson needs 132 yards passing and safety Kam Chancellor needs eight tackles. That’s reasonable. But wide receiver Sidney Rice needs 266 yards, and defensive end Chris Clemons needs 3.5 sacks. They’re in the playoffs.
    There are division champions that aren’t even within sniffing distance of Miami’s likely statistical accomplishment. Houston (12-3), for example, won’t have the tackles duo. Denver (12-3) won’t have the tackling duo or the rusher.
    The Dolphins are, in a sense, breathing rarified air.
    Of course, here’s the evidence for the “just numbers” side of things:
    --Buffalo (5-10) has a very outside shot at matching the Dolphins with those numbers. Safety George Wilson needs two tackles and wide receiver Stevie Johnson needs 65 yards receiving. The sticking point is defensive end Mario Williams. He needs 4.5 sacks. He won’t get that, but he could come close. That takes a little shine off Miami’s accomplishment. You saw Buffalo up close on Sunday.
    Still, to have such numbers – a 1,000-yard rusher and receiver, a 3,000-yard passer, someone with at least 15 sacks and two guys with 100 tackles apiece – hints at balance and a distribution of talent. You’d think it would be a sign of a good team. You’d think it would keep a team in playoff contention.
    Unfortunately for the Dolphins, it seems they’re just numbers.
    You Play to Win the Game!
    In It to Win It!


    Quote Quote  

  2. -2
    Phindog's Avatar
    Perennial All-Pro

    Status:
    Offline
    WPA:
    Join date:
    Aug 2010
    Posts:
    3,076
    vCash:
    2046
    Loc:
    New York
    Thanks / No Thanks
    It shows stats aren't always what they are cropped up to be......
    Quote Quote  

  3. -3
    Phins117's Avatar
    Pro Bowler

    Status:
    Offline
    WPA:
    Join date:
    Oct 2011
    Posts:
    1,503
    vCash:
    4521
    Thanks / No Thanks
    It's no lie... With a couple of clutch plays we would easily be in the wildcard.
    Quote Quote  

  4. -4
    Waterlogged

    Status:
    Offline
    WPA:
    Join date:
    Jan 2011
    Posts:
    1,050
    vCash:
    1108
    Thanks / No Thanks
    Couple field goals and we would be in. Impressive with a rookie qb, coaching staff and playbook, and no big name playmakers at the WR or TE
    Quote Quote  

  5. -5
    Pro Bowler

    Status:
    Offline
    WPA:
    Join date:
    Apr 2010
    Posts:
    2,225
    vCash:
    6469
    Loc:
    Jersey
    Thanks / No Thanks
    Dolphins Homer1972 Dolphins Logo2013 Dolphins Logo
    I thought the stat would be fewest yac in NFL history
    Quote Quote  

  6. -6
    Scout Team

    Status:
    Offline
    WPA:
    Join date:
    Aug 2011
    Posts:
    74
    vCash:
    1272
    Thanks / No Thanks
    statistics are for losers. Did we dominate the buffalo game?... now go look at the box score.
    Quote Quote  

  7. -7
    TheJetsBlow's Avatar
    Formerly FireWrongstedt

    Status:
    Offline
    WPA:
    Join date:
    Mar 2006
    Posts:
    3,899
    vCash:
    9473
    Loc:
    Jersey
    Thanks / No Thanks

    Dolphins could be only team in NFL to reach this statistical accomplishment

    Proof once again that stats mean absolutely nothing.
    Die hard Dolphins and Devils fan.
    Quote Quote  

  8. -8
    Atila - the freshmaker.

    Status:
    Offline
    WPA:
    Join date:
    Mar 2004
    Posts:
    3,240
    vCash:
    5785
    Loc:
    Los Angeles, CA
    Thanks / No Thanks
    Hahhaa that stat means next to nothing... they picked and chose specific things to get something that would work for the Dolphins...


    www.DiamondandDesign.com
    Quote Quote  

  9. -9
    miamiron's Avatar
    Hall Of Famer

    Status:
    Offline
    WPA:
    Join date:
    Dec 2005
    Posts:
    7,849
    vCash:
    6
    Loc:
    Hollywood,Florida
    Thanks / No Thanks
    Quote Originally Posted by dolphintodd View Post
    statistics are for losers. Did we dominate the buffalo game?... now go look at the box score.
    Bill James doesn't like you
    Quote Quote  

  10. -10
    Wildbill3's Avatar
    Misery Loves Company

    Status:
    Offline
    WPA:
    Join date:
    Dec 2001
    Posts:
    25,048
    vCash:
    5920
    Loc:
    Kentucky
    Thanks / No Thanks
    Rebel AllianceSuperman logoXbox LogoPlaystation LogoSnakes!
    It shows our close losses could've very easily been wins. It shows we're close with some tweaking.
    "I didn't feel like we had to score," Tannehill said. "I had the mindset we were going to score."

    Quote Quote  

Similar Threads

  1. Dolphins won every major statistical battle
    By BAMAPHIN 22 in forum Miami Dolphins Forum
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 12-27-2010, 06:05 PM
  2. Dolphins must not reach for a QB!
    By SkapePhin in forum Miami Dolphins Forum
    Replies: 63
    Last Post: 12-14-2005, 12:25 AM
  3. Statistical 2005 projects by team
    By thedayafter in forum Miami Dolphins Forum
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 09-07-2005, 01:37 PM
  4. Dolphins red-zone D no early-season statistical quirk
    By CpuFan in forum Miami Dolphins Forum
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 10-05-2003, 10:30 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •